Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Badnarik Arrested
Badnarik Website ^ | October 8, 2004 | News from the trail

Posted on 10/08/2004 8:36:12 PM PDT by diabolicNYC

8:38PM CST

The first report from St. Louis is in - and presidential candidates Michael Badnarik (Libertarian) and David Cobb (Green Party) were just arrested. Badnarik was carrying an Order to Show Cause, which he intended to serve the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD). Earlier today, Libertarians attempted to serve these same papers at the Washington, D.C. headquarters of the CPD - but were stopped from approaching the CPD office by security guards.

Fred Collins reported to me from the ground that Badnarik and Cobb are in great physical condition and great spirit.

As soon as more details are available, they will be posted here immediately.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 3rdpartyloser; arrest; badnarik; biggovernmentbush; doobiesnotbabies; holierthanthou; howboutarealdebate; lesseroftwoevils; libertarians; libertariansrock; lol; looneytarian; loonytoon; loooooser; losertarian; meaninglessact; meaninglessparty; nutcase; ohsopure; smokeadoobie; sowhat; whackjobs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-287 next last
To: Dead Corpse
Since you are asking, it is not surprising to hear you inquire about other people's ideology. Here's a news flash: Not everyone else is harboring some flakey ideology which blinds them, too, to Reality and makes them irrelevant to both modern political discourse and history.

No doubt the cockroach thinks it's a formidable opposition to the Orkin Man, too.
141 posted on 10/11/2004 6:54:40 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
My "ideology" centers around personal responsibility and Freedom. If you have a problem with that, head on back to Storm Front, DU, or what ever other slime covered rock you crawled out from under.

Your constant advocacy of more government intrusion in our lives to buttress your own particular flavor of socialism is sickening...

142 posted on 10/11/2004 7:02:23 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (My days of taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Excellent article with a libertarian property Rights perspective.

I think he thinks we should give America back to the Indians.

143 posted on 10/11/2004 7:12:18 AM PDT by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey

Depends. The Indians really didn't have a concept of private property. If anything, a libertarian view of it would have had us buying or trading for Indian lands instead of killing them off whole sale. Such probably would have been the out come had the Indians themselves not taken to killing so many of the settlers.


144 posted on 10/11/2004 7:14:41 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (My days of taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Then feel free to correct me and an apology will be forthcoming.

You stand corrected, no for your apology.

145 posted on 10/11/2004 7:14:46 AM PDT by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Stop the presses! Me-ocrats think that people having the freedom to decide what kind of a society they are to live in is slavery!


146 posted on 10/11/2004 7:16:19 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Depends. The Indians really didn't have a concept of private property. If anything, a libertarian view of it would have had us buying or trading for Indian lands instead of killing them off whole sale. Such probably would have been the out come had the Indians themselves not taken to killing so many of the settlers.

That's right! Since the Indians had no concept of private property, only collective territories, they had no right to defend themselves against the invaders.

147 posted on 10/11/2004 7:18:02 AM PDT by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Hell, why not invite me to the debates? Why not you? For that matter, why don't the 3rd partyites have their own debate?


148 posted on 10/11/2004 7:19:39 AM PDT by AmishDude (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad

Yes. When the kind of people like you are choosing to live in a socialist society that makes slaves of the rest of us... At one point in our history, a majority saw nothing wrong with slavery. Are you racist enough to think that if a majority that such was OK again, we should institute it?


149 posted on 10/11/2004 7:19:40 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (My days of taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey

You ALWAYS have a Right to defend yourself. Your own flesh is your property. No one elses. Your statement really makes no point at all.


150 posted on 10/11/2004 7:20:54 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (My days of taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Are you on the ballot as a Presidential Candidate? I know I'm not. Ergo, why should either of us expect to speak at a PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES DEBATE?


151 posted on 10/11/2004 7:21:55 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (My days of taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War

I don't know if you're referring to the same event, but Keyes did try to forcibly enter a debate here in Atlanta, was hauled off by the police and, when they decided not to charge him, was dropped off on a street corner in one of the less savory parts of town. I've since had an amusing image in my mind of Dr. Keyes forcefully conveying his views to the other denizens of the corner that night.


152 posted on 10/11/2004 7:22:06 AM PDT by lugsoul (Until at last I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: diabolicNYC

They both should be tried for stupidity...there's a good case here.


153 posted on 10/11/2004 7:22:43 AM PDT by ApesForEvolution (You will NEVER convince me that Muhammadanism isn't a veil for MASS MURDERS. Save your time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zetapsi

Actually I know someone who is voting Badnaric instead of Kerry.


154 posted on 10/11/2004 7:23:12 AM PDT by eyespysomething (Idealism is fine, but as it approaches reality the cost becomes prohibitive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething
I've talked a couple "anyone but Bush" types into voting for Badnarik rather than Kerry. My own father among them.

I'm voting Bush as I promised to do.

155 posted on 10/11/2004 7:26:38 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (My days of taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
[snip of Libertarian wish list] Depends on perspective....

Your list reminds me of the game where you start by saying "If I ruled the world, things would be different..."

Libertarianism in a nutshell is an agenda for social change accompanied by absolutely no practical idea of how to achieve it.

156 posted on 10/11/2004 7:27:30 AM PDT by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Your histrionics and catatonic convulsions notwithstanding, you haven't shown that excluding Mr. Badassick from the debates is a form of racism or slavery, although I will grant you have a point that majoritarianism does not make something right and good.


157 posted on 10/11/2004 7:27:40 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Just because you get a handful of signatures doesn't mean anyone has to take you seriously. What kind of "debate" is it where a dozen people are on stage bloviating, doing nothing more than trying to get free publicity?


158 posted on 10/11/2004 7:28:05 AM PDT by AmishDude (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
You ALWAYS have a Right to defend yourself.

Makes sense for the 9th. A burgler kills a homeowner while in the homeowners house. Delclares self-defense sense the homeowner had his gun drawn and pointed at him.

159 posted on 10/11/2004 7:28:44 AM PDT by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird
Libertarianism in a nutshell is an agenda for social change accompanied by absolutely no practical idea of how to achieve it.

Head on over to Cato, Reason, or even FreeMarket.net for the gritty details. Yes, we have all kinds of ideas for practical application. Rolling the FedGov back to Constitutional limits is an excellent start.

Or do you have an issue with that as well?

160 posted on 10/11/2004 7:30:27 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (My days of taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-287 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson