Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alan Keyes: "Contrary to what people say, I don't neglect any issues."
RenewAmerica.us ^ | October 8th, 2004 | Alan Keyes (transcript of spoken remarks)

Posted on 10/08/2004 7:49:02 AM PDT by EternalVigilance

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: Nonstatist
Hey, listen, Id vote for him over Obama, but its a waste of time knowing how it will end up,

This election is not a foregone conclusion as long as good people are hard at work in Illinois and elsewhere, drumming up support wherever they go. Whether or not he wants to, Obama cannot generate votes out of whole cloth (well...possibly in Illinois, but hopefully with the army Keyes assmbles there, cheating will be unlikely). Last I heard, Keyes has somewhere between 5,000 and 7,000 volunteers getting the word out in Illinois. That's a phenominal number! With three debates on the horizon, Obama may yet be exposed for the farce he is. If that happens, you can be glad that Keyes ran a principled campaign that will not require him to contradict himself in office.

42 posted on 10/08/2004 10:54:13 AM PDT by outlawcam (No time to waste. Now get moving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

By the way, unlike 99.9 % of the people here, I have actually voted for the guy twice for public office. So I think I can afford to talk about the quality of his "electability"..


43 posted on 10/08/2004 10:55:32 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: outlawcam
Keyes has somewhere between 5,000 and 7,000 volunteers getting the word out in Illinois

If he can get as much of the vote percentage that he got in Maryland (29 %), I'll give you five bucks.

44 posted on 10/08/2004 10:58:07 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

No, the fact you've voted for him doesn't give you carte blanche to empower Obama.


45 posted on 10/08/2004 11:00:21 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: outlawcam

If several million more Illinoisans had your great attitude and outlook, this state would be a very different place politically.


46 posted on 10/08/2004 11:02:56 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist
If he can get as much of the vote percentage that he got in Maryland (29 %), I'll give you five bucks.

I would be satisfied if you just took the time you use to smash Keyes' "electability" or other qualities on this forum to instead praise his good qualities, or even the qualities of another candidate who you find more "electable." I'd say I would give you five bucks, but if I had that to spare, I'd send it to the Keyes campaign.

You may also choose to smash Obama's record every chance you get. Time better spent, IMO, than showing distress or disappointment in his opponent.

47 posted on 10/08/2004 11:03:04 AM PDT by outlawcam (No time to waste. Now get moving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

That's the problem with him. He's too bombastic and has said some pretty stupid things here. I'm totally frustrated with the guy, although I agree with a lot of what he says. He's just said some really off the wall things that make me uncomfortable. So, I haven't decided yet whether to just not vote for Senate or to vote for him. Good Republicans in this state are very frustrated with Keyes. He's come across as a nutball.


48 posted on 10/08/2004 11:17:37 AM PDT by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: Endeavor
but I am looking for a reason to vote for Keyes.
The following should be ample reason by itself to vote for Keyes if you live in IL..... jmo.


50 posted on 10/08/2004 11:23:12 AM PDT by deport ("Because we believe in human dignity..." [President Bush at the UN])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tame
ELECTION 2004 DEBATES ARE ON WBBM NEWSRADIO 780


Listen October 12 for exclusive live coverage of the Obama-Keyes U.S. Senate candidates debate. WBBM also is your radio source for live coverage of the Presidential and Vice-Presidential debates.

U.S. Senate Debate

Listen for exclusive WBBM Newsradio 780 coverage of the Tuesday, October 12 debate between Illinois U.S. Senate candidates Barack Obama (Democrat) and Alan Keyes (Republican). Tune in from 7 p.m.-8 p.m.

The debate will be held in the Old State Capitol Building in Springfield. You can hear it only on WBBM Newsradio 780.

Moderators are WBBM Political Editor Craig Dellimore, CBS 2's Mike Flannery and the Illinois Radio Network's Jim Anderson.


51 posted on 10/08/2004 11:28:06 AM PDT by deport ("Because we believe in human dignity..." [President Bush at the UN])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor
He's come across as a nutball.

Conservatives always come across that way after the information has gone through the media filter.

I'm surprised how many of our people don't know how to just ignore it and fight on.

52 posted on 10/08/2004 11:30:03 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: deport

thanx!


53 posted on 10/08/2004 11:31:13 AM PDT by tame (Are you willing to do for the truth what leftists are willing to do for a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: deport

Great posts.

There is also a Rally planned at the Old Capitol before the debate. Dr. Keyes will address the crowd briefly before he enters.

Then the Keyes campaign will be providing a place nearby to listen to the debate, to be joined by Alan afterwards.


54 posted on 10/08/2004 11:33:08 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

Knock off the personal attacks on Keyes. This is the last warning.


55 posted on 10/08/2004 11:35:26 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: deport

I'm told that C-SPAN will be taping, for later rebroadcast.

So in fact this will end up being a televised debate in the end.


56 posted on 10/08/2004 11:37:19 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Thanks for the attention.


57 posted on 10/08/2004 11:39:50 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor
I'm totally frustrated with the guy, although I agree with a lot of what he says. He's just said some really off the wall things that make me uncomfortable.

I don't want to suggest to you that I think that you don't have the right to feel frustrated or uncomfortable, and I would never encourage you to vote for anything or anyone that your conscience will not countenance. I don't agree with anyone 100% of the time, and that includes Keyes.

It appears to me that you're trying to figure out how to best utilize your vote. I wish everybody would really contemplate political responsibility as you seem to be doing rather than blindly following a political brand out of habit or for completely self-serving reasons.

You mentioned some generalities about some of the things he's said here (I presume this has to do with articles you've read here), and on this forum you will find plenty of arguments and frustrations to go around. I would suggest, though, that perhaps some of the way he's been construed have not been entirely accurate. If you relied on news reports from CBS to decide your presidential selection, would you really vote for Bush? I could be wrong, but my guess is that you wouldn't. Similarly, IMO, you shouldn't rely on the news media to judge Keyes. If you read the transcripts (such as this one), you'll see that he's not the "nutball" that the media makes him out to be. Without exception, every time I've read a quote attributed to Keyes that made me stand back and wonder what he was thinking, an examination of the transcript reveals a distortion of his position due to incomplete information.

What sort of things do you look for in a candidate, typically? Is this the sort of issue where you can put the pros and cons in different columns and add them up to determine whether or not it would be more beneficial to vote for him or to not vote for him?

While I may wish sometimes that Keyes be able to manipulate the media to write great, platitude-laden, vague articles on him, further reflection makes me realize that this is what all politicians do, and I'm not at all satisfied with current politicians.

That's the thing I like the most about Bush, for instance. When he's not talking in platitudes, he pretty much does what he says he's going to do--whether or not I agree with him. He lays it all out on the table and gives voters a chance to decide whether or not they agree with him through their votes. So he smirks (which the media loves to count against him in "style" points). In Texas, we call that "smiling." ;)

The point is, I don't vote based on style. I vote based on substance--not only of policy, but also of character. That is the reason I support Keyes, and that is the reason I will vote for Bush. Of course, your conscience may lead you to a different conclusion than mine, but I hope that our similarities outweigh our differences.

58 posted on 10/08/2004 11:40:47 AM PDT by outlawcam (No time to waste. Now get moving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist
Excuse me, but Obama was being touted as a "superstar" of the Democratic Party as well as a possible 2008 presidential contender before Keyes entered the race. Your premise is faulty.

That said, I see that you did not agree with my assessment of "time better spent." That's too bad.

Let's talk again after the first debate.

59 posted on 10/08/2004 11:46:44 AM PDT by outlawcam (No time to waste. Now get moving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Uh, hello? I'm not talking about media filtration. I'm talking about actual things Keyes has said. Like that he's for slavery reparations. I'm not. His comment about Cheney's daughter was totally inappropriate. I don't like Alan Keyes. I wonder how stable he is. Therefore, I will make my decision in the voting booth. It will not cause Obama to win - he's going to win with 60-75% of the vote.


60 posted on 10/08/2004 12:11:26 PM PDT by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson