Skip to comments.
Forty-one Sarin-filled Rockets found in Iraq
CIA ^
| 10/8/2004
| brookwood
Posted on 10/08/2004 5:49:05 AM PDT by brookwood
Link to www.brodiejohnson.com to view a screen shot of page 30 from the Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq's WMD, which states that 41 sarin/cyclosarin-filled 122mm rockets were found in Kahmisiyah, Iraq, in June and July 2004. This is a stockpile of chemical weapons. Do not let MSM get away with the "no WMDs in Iraq" lie - otherwise get used to seeing John Kerry for the next eight years.
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: found; iraq; sarin; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
To: DaGman
MSM usually means Main Stream media....CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, NYTimes, USA Today, Wash Pst, and my locale, LATimes, etc.....
41
posted on
10/08/2004 6:24:28 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
To: All
Don't you all know that a stockpile by definition has to have at least 100 separate weapons?
41 missiles just don't cut it.
/sarcasm
Comment #43 Removed by Moderator
To: Even Keel
a stockpile is defined as 42 weapons, and they have to be at least 123mm
To: brookwood
To: brookwood
Does the text of the report state the 41 rockets were filled with agent?
46
posted on
10/08/2004 6:29:07 AM PDT
by
ironman
To: brookwood; Mr. Lucky
It's my site, I can't get the image on a thread from here - if you can please post the image.Your comments leave me a bit confused...
Looks like to me that your referenced link.... CIA....is fine and shows up here with no problem.
And ...Mr. Lucky....what's with your complaint?
I'm sure you're a fine person and such, but you are brand spanking new to FreeRepublic and you have just posted a sensational allegation without a link to a corroborating source.
He gave the Link!!!!
47
posted on
10/08/2004 6:29:27 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
To: brookwood; Mr. Lucky
It's my site, I can't get the image on a thread from here - if you can please post the image.Your comments leave me a bit confused...
Looks like to me that your referenced link.... CIA....is fine and shows up here with no problem.
And ...Mr. Lucky....what's with your complaint?
I'm sure you're a fine person and such, but you are brand spanking new to FreeRepublic and you have just posted a sensational allegation without a link to a corroborating source.
He gave the Link!!!!
But confused us all .....
48
posted on
10/08/2004 6:30:32 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
To: brookwood
in all honestly I think the Dems would only be convinced of WMD is if we found an actual Nuke in a rocket, on a launcher primed and ready to launch. Anything else need not apply.
Chemicals in their mind aren't WMD's.
Just shows their narrow mindedness.
To: bitt
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Good point....
Would be nice if our media had the same attitude.
51
posted on
10/08/2004 6:32:47 AM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
To: brookwood
Technically it's not a stockpile unless there are at least 42. < / sarcasm>
52
posted on
10/08/2004 6:32:52 AM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
("We deal in hard calibers and hot lead." - Roland Deschaines)
To: brookwood; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
PING......Voulme 3 page 30
To: hawkaw
How much constitutes a 'stockpile'?
54
posted on
10/08/2004 6:34:43 AM PDT
by
Eagle Eye
(Hey! They've got lettuce today. Oops, that's not lettuce...)
To: OXENinFLA
so why is bush being so spineless and not pointing these instances out???? seriously. i don't get it.
55
posted on
10/08/2004 6:35:00 AM PDT
by
applpie
Comment #56 Removed by Moderator
To: brookwood
57
posted on
10/08/2004 6:36:30 AM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: lula
The oil for WMD scam and bribery parade was designed to fool the UN inspectors and remove UN sanctions. Once the UN inspectors declared there were no WMDs, sanctions got lifted, WMD production begins ASAP.
So Iraq dumped their WMD stocks, or hide them in Syria, easier to make new rather than store and hide old. The oil for WMD money was used to built dual use facilities and delivery vehicles. Intelligence hits were probably on the WMD programs not the actual materials or weapons. Warhead filling begins in 6 months post sanctions. Neat plan.
It's all in the ISG report for all to read, the report is embargoed -- prohibits MSM use.
58
posted on
10/08/2004 6:37:28 AM PDT
by
Tarpon
To: Joe 6-pack
Please, please, please let me hear Bush say in the debate: "The fact that Senator Kerry doesn't recognize 41 nerve gas rockets as being WMD makes him unfit to be CIC."
59
posted on
10/08/2004 6:37:58 AM PDT
by
Rebelbase
("We will crush Al Qaeda"....Silky Pony)
To: Darksheare
60
posted on
10/08/2004 6:42:17 AM PDT
by
DJ MacWoW
(Save a Democrat! Vote Republican!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson