Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: MarlboroRed
The liberals worship the UN. As a result, the mainstream media will print and air nothing that could discredit their "precious." Mark Steyn right; the OFF program shows us the UN is about anything but securing international peace and security; in reality it was a welfare and public relations program for Saddam Hussein. Don't count on AP or your evening news anchor person to highlight the truth that damns the Kerry/Edwards ticket.
37 posted on
10/07/2004 6:51:26 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: MarlboroRed
Makes you wonder who else was bought off.
38 posted on
10/07/2004 7:09:16 PM PDT by
Mercat
To: MarlboroRed
Your all missing the point, this story is errupting everywhere.
It is without a doubt the most outlandishly disgusting story of modern times and will not die.
It also leaves 'Effin vulnerable to merciless attack, due to his cretinous belief in the UN et al.
39 posted on
10/07/2004 7:23:26 PM PDT by
crazycat
To: MarlboroRed
40 posted on
10/07/2004 7:33:53 PM PDT by
Tax-chick
(If you stand very still, they may think you're a tree.)
To: MarlboroRed
Great post and comments bump!
41 posted on
10/07/2004 7:44:34 PM PDT by
PGalt
To: MarlboroRed
I hope and pray that this is what brings the UN down...
Mama
To: MarlboroRed
The UN is much worse than "useless." It is the enemy of all national sovereignty. It is the enemy of the American Revolution. It is the enemy of the US Constitution. It is the enemy of our real allies (especially Israel). It is the enemy of the right to keep and bear arms. It is the enemy of unborn children. It is the enemy of parents. It is the enemy of the Church. It is the enemy of God Himself. THE UN MUST BE DESTROYED!
To: MarlboroRed
Did you see that? 15 bil of aid, 100 bil of business...no wonder Saddam pretended like he still had wmd....much too profitable...
48 posted on
10/07/2004 8:42:39 PM PDT by
Knitting A Conundrum
(Giving Comfort to the Enemy Is Not Something A Presidential Candidate Should Do)
To: MarlboroRed
They need to confiscate the wealth of these corrupt UN officials to at least partially repay the Iraqi people. Kofi should be returned to a mud hut in Guiana.
51 posted on
10/07/2004 10:19:42 PM PDT by
McGavin999
(If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
To: MarlboroRed
Again, Steyn is a wonderful herald.
Get the UN out of USA! I could use an international court against all involved in the oil-for-food scam.
52 posted on
10/07/2004 10:49:25 PM PDT by
Ruth A.
To: MarlboroRed
Piss on the U.N.!
54 posted on
10/07/2004 11:08:55 PM PDT by
paleocon patriarch
(President Bush is a fighter - John Kerry is a TOMATO CANdidate)
To: MarlboroRed
57 posted on
10/08/2004 1:04:50 AM PDT by
lainde
(Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
To: MarlboroRed
Everyone is getting in on kicking the oil for WMD scam and bribery parade. 'bout time.
59 posted on
10/08/2004 4:57:52 AM PDT by
Tarpon
To: Tom Jefferson; backhoe; Militiaman7; BARLF; timestax; imintrouble; cake_crumb; Brad's Gramma; ...
Where did all the other billions go? According to Kofi Annan himself, some $31 billion went on other "humanitarian" spending for Iraq. Such as? Well, in 2002, the Secretary-General expanded the programme to cover other "humanitarian" categories such as "sport", "information", "justice" and "labour and social affairs".
In Iraq, "sport" meant Uday's rape rooms, and "justice" meant a mass grave out in the desert, but that's not to say there weren't attendant expenses involved. So Kofi himself directly approved such "humanitarian" items as $20 million for an "Olympic sport city" (state-of-the-art rape rooms) and $50 million for Iraq's Ministry of Information (Comical Ali's office).
No more UN for US-list
If people want on or off this list, please let me know.
60 posted on
10/08/2004 12:07:15 PM PDT by
knighthawk
(We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
To: MarlboroRed
The UN isn't "useless", it's "dangerous"!
68 posted on
10/08/2004 2:07:40 PM PDT by
Gritty
("The abomination that happened in one Russian schoolhouse has to be defeated, not regretted-Mk Steyn)
To: MarlboroRed
I love Mark Steyn...he always nails it.
71 posted on
10/08/2004 3:14:43 PM PDT by
shield
(The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
To: MarlboroRed
"No matter how corrupt and depraved it is in practice, the organisation's sunny utopian image endures. Say the initials "UN" to your average member of Ms Toynbee's legions of the unthinking and they conjure up not UN participation in the sex-slave trade in Bosnia, nor the UN refugee extortion racket in Kenya, nor the UN cover-up of the sex-for-food scandal in West Africa, nor UN complicity in massacres, but some misty Unesco cultural event compered by the late Sir Peter Ustinov featuring photogenic children of many lands."
As usual, Steyn hits it out of the park.
72 posted on
10/08/2004 3:18:09 PM PDT by
Polonius
(It's called logic, it'll help you.)
To: MarlboroRed
74 posted on
10/08/2004 3:34:58 PM PDT by
snooker
(French Fried Flip Flopper still Flouncing, be careful out there.)
To: MarlboroRed
John F. Kerry's hopes for being elected president depend upon the thin thread of the President's determination to be polite. Thus far the Oil for Fraud (good term) program has largely been kept out of the US propaganda organs. If the President were to blow the lid off it by, for example, bringing it up in a nationally, nay globally televised debate, Kerry would be left without a leg to stand on.
This could actually happen. Duelfer's report went rather far afield to include documentation of UNron's (another great term) involvement in the Greatest Fraud In History. I don't think it would have been included with out the Presiden't approval, perhaps even his direction. It's in the report. There's no reason to bring it up when the Dork starts talking about the allies tonight. I don't really expect this to happen because nothing this dramatic ever seems to happen when you expect it. But it could.
Here's some more food for thought. There's been talk of an October Surprise. I've been wondering why there was so much bribery of French, German, Russian, and even British elements but there was so little bribery of prominent Americans. What if there WAS bribery of Americans? What if a certain individual who is a horse-faced DORK was on the list of Americans paid to oppose the war?
Probably not true since he voted for the authorization. But man would that be sweet.
75 posted on
10/08/2004 3:43:11 PM PDT by
johnb838
(If you don't know what you're talking about, there's no shame in not voting)
To: MarlboroRed
It is my humble opion that the un is a harbenger of evil on earth! It will be dealt with when the BOSS [read as Jesus] comes back! We must try to hold our heads together and keep to our beliefs and true to GOD's word.
77 posted on
10/08/2004 4:00:14 PM PDT by
TMSuchman
(If we don't get out to vote, the anti-Americans will win, and we will loose everything!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson