Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fight Back Against The Democrat "Draft" Email Scare Tactic -- Take Action Here

Posted on 10/05/2004 8:38:59 AM PDT by jmstein7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 10/05/2004 8:38:59 AM PDT by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightRules; MeekOneGOP; Peach; onyx; backhoe; Mia T; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; DoughtyOne; abner; ..

Counter the Lie BUMP!


2 posted on 10/05/2004 8:40:08 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baklava; BadDogBill; BADROTOFINGER; baggadonuts; Bahbah; Baloo-Myers; BamaGirl; barker; ...

Counter the Lie BUMP!


3 posted on 10/05/2004 8:41:17 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: jmstein7

Or, we could publicize the Draft Bill that has actually made it to the House Floor and is scheduled for a vote later tonight - it's expected to be defeated handily...


5 posted on 10/05/2004 8:43:30 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (How do you ask a hamster to be the last hamster to die for a mistake?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

House expected to reject draft proposal
Washington, DC, Oct. 5 (UPI) -- The House of Representatives is expected to reject Tuesday a bill to reinstate the military draft.
The bill is sponsored by Rep. Charles Rangel, a New York Democrat, who introduced the legislation in an attempt to force Americans to consider the human cost of the war in Iraq. A majority of the enlisted recruits come from the lowest economic classes, a fact Rangel believes makes it easy for the middle and upper classes to support war, because it is not their children at risk.

The bill, H.R. 163, is expected to be defeated soundly. It would require every U.S. citizen and every other person residing in the country between the ages of 18 and 26 to perform a two-year period of national service, either as a member of the reserves or in a civilian capacity that promotes national defense.

Sen. Ernest Hollings, D-S.C., has introduced identical legislation. The Pentagon firmly opposes reinstating the draft.


6 posted on 10/05/2004 8:44:43 AM PDT by boxerblues (www.ohbluestarmothers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20041005-102808-1701r.htm


7 posted on 10/05/2004 8:45:03 AM PDT by boxerblues (www.ohbluestarmothers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

It would be great if you could get a hold of the DNC's email list. They're the people who need to read this. I'm not suggesting we break any laws, but is there away to do that?


8 posted on 10/05/2004 8:45:49 AM PDT by Novel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Novel; All

Just send it to your email lists and tell the people you send it to to send it to their lists. It will make the "rounds" that way.


9 posted on 10/05/2004 8:50:19 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
A variation of this story appeared as a letter to the editor in our paper today, providing a link to thomas.gov to attribute the claims made.

I wrote to the editor, explaining that if the author had clicked on his own link he would have discovered that all sponsors are Democrats. But, stupid is as stupid does. We'll see if the reply gets printed.

10 posted on 10/05/2004 8:52:56 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("I speak Spanish to God, French to women, English to men, and Japanese to my horse."-Buckaroo Banzai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Just fyi (and it's not urgent, actually, imho) .....

URGENT!!!! H.R. 163 Draft BILL Scheduled FOR VOTE!!!!


11 posted on 10/05/2004 8:54:31 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Become a monthly donor on FR. No amount is too small and monthly giving is the way to go !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Democrats certainly know their constituents, don't they? They're the same people that believe there is a pervasive ring of kidney thieves, that black voting rights will expire, and that Enfamil is issuing $400 refunds, that Microsoft (or Disney) will pay you $5000 to test an email tracking program.

The Dems may be on to their greatest marketing genius ever.

12 posted on 10/05/2004 8:58:14 AM PDT by tdadams ('Unfit for Command' is full of lies... it quotes John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Jonathan,

Can you check to see whether it's true (per another thread on FR), that Hastert is going to bring the Rangel bill to the floor for a vote today? If so, this whole Internet scam will be dead, Dead, DEAD.

Congressman Billybob

13 posted on 10/05/2004 9:02:16 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

BTTT!!!!!!!


14 posted on 10/05/2004 9:04:04 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

This has been a live topic in my circle of friends and family since June. Even when I shoot down their attempts to scare people by showing them the truth, this thing keeps cropping up. I did a google search and people are tripping all over each other in perpetrating this hoax!


Thanks for the ping.


15 posted on 10/05/2004 9:04:16 AM PDT by Beth (Oh, but what do I know; I'm in my pajamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

I just heard the same thing. I will check it out...


16 posted on 10/05/2004 9:04:17 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Belay that last post. Read the thread. Hastert (Republicans) win; Rangel (Democrats) lose. Ne-VER-Mind.

An embarrassed Billybob

17 posted on 10/05/2004 9:06:06 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Belay that last post. Read the thread. Hastert (Republicans) win; Rangel (Democrats) lose. Ne-VER-Mind.

An embarrassed Billybob

18 posted on 10/05/2004 9:06:13 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

I just "shotgun-emailed" this to about a hundred people.

House expected to reject draft proposal
Washington, DC, Oct. 5 (UPI) -- The House of Representatives is expected to reject Tuesday a bill to reinstate the military draft.
The bill is sponsored by Rep. Charles Rangel, a New York Democrat, who introduced the legislation in an attempt to force Americans to consider the human cost of the war in Iraq. A majority of the enlisted recruits come from the lowest economic classes, a fact Rangel believes makes it easy for the middle and upper classes to support war, because it is not their children at risk.

The bill, H.R. 163, is expected to be defeated soundly. It would require every U.S. citizen and every other person residing in the country between the ages of 18 and 26 to perform a two-year period of national service, either as a member of the reserves or in a civilian capacity that promotes national defense.

Sen. Ernest Hollings, D-S.C., has introduced identical legislation. The Pentagon firmly opposes reinstating the draft.


19 posted on 10/05/2004 9:32:08 AM PDT by bicyclerepair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

Countered BTTT

TFTP


20 posted on 10/05/2004 9:46:27 AM PDT by ApesForEvolution (You will NEVER convince me that Muhammadanism isn't a veil for MASS MURDERS. Save your time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson