Posted on 10/04/2004 12:00:29 PM PDT by old-ager
| Home :: About InfoWorld :: Advertise :: Subscribe :: Contact Us :: Awards :: Events |
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indian professionals, venture capitalists (VCs), and entrepreneurs of Indian origin helped promote India as an outsourcing destination, according to a study conducted for the World Bank Institute in Washington, D.C., by Evalueserve Inc., a business intelligence and research firm.
While other low-cost destinations are slowly catching up with India in outsourcing, the country will retain its edge because of the growing influence and expertise of the Indian diaspora, particularly in the U.S., Canada and the U.K., the study said. A key factor is the increase in organized networking and mentoring that the diaspora community can provide to businesses engaged in outsourcing, the study said. By the 1990s, many Indian engineers, who started moving to the U.S. in the 1960s, had either become entrepreneurs, VCs or senior executives in large and medium-size companies, according to the study. Many of these professionals started their own companies in India, while others persuaded their companies to hire Indian IT professionals. This provided more visibility to the Indian talent pool and resulted in the strengthening of the diaspora. For example, by late 1999, Indians constituted approximately 24 percent of the IT professional population of Silicon Valley, the study said. Some VCs in the U.S., particularly those of Indian origin, are actively funding companies that have back-end operations in India to save on research and development (R&D) costs, the study said. As of March this year, more than 150 U.S. startups had some back-end operations in India, and the number is likely to double by March 2006, according to the study. Because fewer funds are available to startups now than before the dot-com boom and bust, offshoring R&D is key to the strategy of these companies, said Promod Haque, managing partner of Norwest Venture Partners in Palo Alto, California. Whether the work is outsourced to India, or to any other offshore outsourcing location, can to an extent be influenced by where key employees come from, but in the end, such decisions are made purely on business grounds, said Haque, who is Indian, during a recent visit to India. While expatriates agree that the diaspora has been a major catalyst for India's outsourcing boom, many downplay its role in the gradual transformation of India, according to the Evalueserve study. The sudden demand for skilled labor brought by Internet growth and the year 2000 software problem would have drawn India's engineers and technicians into the global IT industry regardless of the diaspora's role, the study said. "Countries such as South Africa, Russia, and other Eastern European countries were not similarly drafted into the boom and we believe that the influence of the (Indian) diaspora has been crucial," said Alok Aggarwal, a co-founder of Evalueserve, which has operations in Chappaqua, New York, and Gurgaon near Delhi. However, Prakash Gurbaxani, chief executive officer of TransWorks Information Services Pvt. Ltd., a Mumbai-based business process outsourcing company, says that the role of the Indian diaspora has been overrated. The boom in offshoring to India was not driven by Indians abroad, but by companies like General Electric Co. in Fairfield, Connecticut, which back in the 1990s saw value in outsourcing to India, Gurbaxani said. "The decision to outsource offshore to India is taken on business grounds, and comes from India's reputation as a location for low-cost and quality services, that companies like GE helped build," Gurbaxani said. "Typically, the Indians in the organization would perhaps be asked to help facilitate the move offshore to India because of their knowledge of the country, but very rarely do they influence the decision of large multinational companies to outsource to India." The findings of the outsourcing report will form part of a book on the role of diaspora networks as development springboards, to be published next year by the World Bank.
RELATED TECHINDEX CATEGORIES
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||
"Diaspora...?" Who dispersed them?
And pardon me for presuming ulterior agendas on the part of the rash of recently started "intelligence" publications. Several of those publications taught me to do so.
This ain't your grandparents' Diaspora
the growing influence and expertise of the Indian diaspora, particularly in the U.S., Canada and the U.K., the study said.
The India caucus in Congress, www.usindiafriendship.net/ and www.usinpac.com/ are vehicles of that influence here. How, for example, does all three entities' support of outsourcing jobs to India help Indians choosing to live here in America?
Diaspora is no longer about persecuted peoples -- it's about economics. Lots of docs on the Internet. Here's just one. google "Diaspora Giving and the Future of Philanthropy"
Another source is Columbia's Professor Bhagwati and his "World Migration Organization"
A diaspora is a transnational network of dispersed political subjects connected by ties of co-responsibility across the boundaries of empires, political communities or (in a world of nation-states) nations. Members of a diaspora retain a deep sense of attachment to their community/country of origin, and continue to be actively engaged in its struggles and its celebrations.
Would anyone be surprised to learn that the corrupt government of Mexico has had a policy of "Mexican Diaspora" for more that a decade? Does this help explain jerks, including Fox, from the corrupt government of Mexico constantly meddling in our affairs at all levels of government and business?
Smart point.Everyone seems to think that the Indian diaspora consists of all those enterpreneurs in the US.But we in India use that term to also describe those Indians who left for various parts of Africa,South East Asia ,the Carribean etc during the British era(to put it more bluntly,they were taken there).A significant amount of the Indian population in Britain & Canada/US etc are people who were forced to leave Africa in the 60s & 70s(though they did recieve British passports).Many of these displaced folks have enjoyed material success of late.
Thank you for the information. I should study more about the history of India regarding its relation to the British Empire.
You've got a huge number of Indians in Fiji (where they are like 48% of the population and are 100% of the merchant, entrepreneurial/business class), in the Caribbean (such as V.S. Naipaul's family) and Guyana. Then, you've a huge number of Indians in East and South Africa where they were taken by the Brits (the Brits found that Indians were better workers and merchants and administrators than the natives) -- that's why in Africa most of the merchant/business class are Indians and most of the administrators under the British were Indians. When Idi Amin took over Uganda, he threw out the Indians -- jobs for Africans. Uganda's economy collapsed but it was the UK's gain -- many of the businesses that then fuelled the UK's rise in the 80s were run by those who escaped from Africa -- like the family of Swraj Paul (the guy who saved London Zoo)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.