Well, your screen name is indeed appropriate. We have only been talking about that for the whole day.
Don't worry, I just found out a few minutes ago too Captain.
Welcome to Free Republic. It's hit Drudge and also it hit Mens News Daily. Hopefully tomorrow it will hit mainstream media outlets, but I doubt it.
I've seen others say they saw it.
To me, Kerry definitely pulled somthing out. Note cards he was squaring up, or paper he was unfolding.
Bush is doing something to, but I think it is with a pen.
I think it's pretty "obvious" that the Kerry campaign is hoping this, like the Swift Vets, will die out. You know, I heard Clinton once say that when he got attacked, he immediately responded. If the Clinton people are on Kerry's campaign now, how come they haven't immediately responded to this? The reason is simple - they're hoping we won't yell and holler about it. I'm going to write a letter to my newspaper asking why no one is yelling about cheating. It doesn't matter what Kerry took up there, he wasn't supposed to take anything up there with him.
I'm with Michael Savage's assessment of liberals in the belief in their own cause, which goes something like this:
Liberals believe they MUST get power back, before the right of the oppressed (gays, minorities, the environment, and so on) are extinguished, and must do whatever it takes to carry the crusade forward, legal or illegal, moral or immoral.
To strengthen the point, Savage once said that if someone take a gun to the head of a Carter of McGovern type, and ask them why they did us so wrong, they would never confess, ever. They would steadfastly maintain their innocence, saying they honestly in their hearts (that's a laugh) what they believed was right. And of course, Savage finished by saying that he clearly was not advocating any violence toward these types, of course.
The only thing I can add to this is my profound disappointment in today's liberals, who feel free to walk up to a microphone, to a tv camera, to congress, or to the white house, and take a huge dump (figuratively speaking) in public. When I hear these people use the word "conscience" to describe either themselves or their cause, I'm pissed, because the word "conscience" at this point has been diluted and rendered almost inoperable.
kbeam
Seeing as he was taking notes the whole time could whatever he got out of his pocket have been a notepad?? There's a bajillion things one can tear Kerry apart on, no need to reach for somethin that probably isn't there.
It's a picture of his wife, for moral support. ;')
Obviously he pulled something out of his jacket with his clammy manicured slick fingers. His notes which he is looking at while his long ghoulish chin rests on his narrow chest.
I cannot bear to watch his hands flapping all over the place...
Are BUCKHEAD and TANKERKC on this thread? I'm just now checking it! :-)
Who cares? This is going nowhere. Reason? Dems will say Bush had a piece of paper so he cheated too. We will say "But that's the paper he was allowed to have under the rules." Dems will say "Bush had piece of paper so he cheated too." MSM reports "both candidates had paper so both cheated - but based on Bush's performance, his paper was blank."
Did he wear his glasses during the debate? Needed glasses so he could read the teleprompter...or notes Lehrer left for him? </tin-foil hat>
Back and to the left....back and to the left....back and to the left.... Just like JFK!
Do you have any influence with the MSM to ensure that this is plastered all over the newscasts/newspapers/etc.?
Welcome to FR.
He was pulling out a screwdriver to disable the lights.
It was Lehrer's questions, the demorats probably had them ahead of time, considering how fast sKerry had his answers for them!
This just shows everyone Kerry's arrogance and his utter diregard for rules. After all HE is a US Senator! HE doesn't follow the rules HE makes the rules! I bet he had the debate questions in advance. Kerry is disgusting!
