Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's Party Chief Tells Army to Be Ready for War
Reuters ^

Posted on 09/30/2004 6:35:28 AM PDT by engineer506

BEIJING (Reuters) - Chinese Communist Party chief and President Hu Jintao has urged the People's Liberation Army (PLA) to prepare for a military struggle, but stopped short of singling out rival Taiwan as the target. Many security analysts see the Taiwan Strait as the most dangerous flashpoint in Asia. China claims sovereignty over Taiwan and has threatened to attack if the democratic island of 23 million people declares independence.

Hu, who assumed the role of military chief less than two weeks ago, told the 2.5-million-strong PLA to "seize the moment and do a good job of preparing for a military struggle," the People's Daily and the Liberation Army Daily said on Thursday.

Hu did not say against whom the struggle might be fought.

But on Wednesday, a spokesman for China's policymaking Taiwan Affairs Office accused Taiwan Premier Yu Shyi-kun of clamoring for war with threats to fire missiles at Shanghai if the PLA attacked the self-ruled island.

Taiwan needed a counter-strike capability, Yu said in defense of plans to buy T$610.8 billion (US$18.2 billion) worth of weapons from the United States.

He made the remarks hours before thousands of people took to the streets of Taipei on Saturday to demand the government scrap the weapons package they said would trigger an arms race with China and squeeze social welfare and state spending on education.

Tension between China and Taiwan has been simmering since the re-election in March of the island's President Chen Shui-bian, who Beijing is convinced will push for statehood during his second four-year term.

Beijing and Taipei have been rivals since their split at the end of the Chinese civil war in 1949, but trade, investment and tourism have blossomed since detente in the late 1980s.

Hu also urged the PLA, the world's biggest army, to "comprehensively revolutionize, modernize and standardize," newspapers said. No details were given.

Hu, 61, replaced Jiang Zemin, 78, as chairman of the Central Military Commission on Sept. 19, completing the most orderly leadership succession in the 55 years since the Communist Party took power.

The following day he promoted two senior officers in a move that was likely to help consolidate his position in the PLA.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: chinataiwan
This is probably just more saber-rattling, but it's unsettling nonetheless.
1 posted on 09/30/2004 6:35:29 AM PDT by engineer506
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: engineer506

China needs to be stopped here and now. When they took over Tibet the world sat silent. That cannot be allowed to happen again.


2 posted on 09/30/2004 6:37:21 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush

We'll never go to war over Taiwan. China is too powerful; our resolve would never be strong enough to see this through. The casualties would be enormous, and a draft would probably be required. I think it's only a matter of time before China passes us in military strength, and since they are a facist state, they don't have to worry about the media stopping them from using it. The best we can do for Taiwan is give them weapons and hope they can do alright for themselves.


3 posted on 09/30/2004 6:40:24 AM PDT by engineer506
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: engineer506

All we would have to do is stop an invasion over the Taiwan Strait, which is a lot wider than the Yalu river.

Unless mistakes are made, it wouldn't be a land war, so wouldn't be a repeat of Korea.


4 posted on 09/30/2004 6:48:37 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: engineer506

Count the days until Japan rearms.


5 posted on 09/30/2004 6:49:49 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: engineer506

Every army should be prepared for war, zipadee doo daa.


6 posted on 09/30/2004 6:50:56 AM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: engineer506

Read later.


7 posted on 09/30/2004 6:52:10 AM PDT by EagleMamaMT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
Every army should be prepared for war, zipadee doo daa.

Every army except ours of course. We keep a military just for posterity. Any use of our military is a crime against humanity.
8 posted on 09/30/2004 6:53:29 AM PDT by mike182d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mike182d

"Every army except ours of course. We keep a military just for posterity. Any use of our military is a crime against humanity."

Yes, because some soldiers in Iraq made terrorists form naked pyramids, we are morally equivalent to Saddam Hussein. Thank you Teddy "God I Am So Hungover Right Now" Kennedy for pointing this out.


9 posted on 09/30/2004 6:58:07 AM PDT by engineer506
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: engineer506

Amphibious & airborne operations a fraught with uncertainty. China is attempting a 3-prong strategy:

1. Create an overwelding bombardment that would quite literally flatten the Island. This goal has been largely achieved.

2. Make it clear to the business & political elites on Taiwan that they will be flattened if any move toward independence is made. The PRC may be able to threaten & cajole the populace of the islands into seeing it Beijing's way at some point -- who knows?

3. Finally, convince the US that it would be too costly to intervene should it come to war. Right now the Taiwan Strait would look like the Iron Man Triatholon swim if the PRC attempted to cross against 7th Fleet opposition. Question is: are we prepared to risk the loss an aircraft carrier in the process?


10 posted on 09/30/2004 7:04:08 AM PDT by Tallguy (If the Kerry campaign implodes any further, they'll reach the point of "singularity" by election day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: engineer506

Why does the U.S. continue to give china MFN trade status? I'd venture to say its their military that benefits from this policy and not the average joe. They're a bunch of stinkin' commies anyway.


11 posted on 09/30/2004 7:06:50 AM PDT by Air Assault (Arm Yourselves!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Air Assault
Why does the U.S. continue to give china MFN trade status? I'd venture to say its their military that benefits from this policy and not the average joe. They're a bunch of stinkin' commies anyway.

I believe it was Slick Willie that did this.
12 posted on 09/30/2004 7:18:17 AM PDT by engineer506
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: engineer506

It was, but I wish Bush would revoke it.


13 posted on 09/30/2004 7:31:58 AM PDT by Air Assault (Arm Yourselves!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: engineer506
Who's Hu?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/674888/posts
14 posted on 09/30/2004 7:34:42 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

And there are other gains China could make without having to risk a cross-channel operation. Taiwan is not the only juicy target they can try to gobble up.


15 posted on 09/30/2004 8:34:42 AM PDT by Atlantic Friend ( Cursum Perficio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson