Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama is Alive and Hiding in.....Pakistan? (Serious vanity...:-)
EV | September 28th, 2004 | EV

Posted on 09/28/2004 7:15:06 PM PDT by EternalVigilance

Obama is spending very little time in IL. He's running from all but two debates. He has not been able to drive a message. He spent all his money building name ID, and now he and his cohorts think it's over.

The Dems are complacent.

Let's take advantage of that.

Just don't tell 'em...shhhhhh....

;-)


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Illinois; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-338 next last
To: EternalVigilance
No, he's simply being realistic. Besides, Keyes stepped off the deep end with his decidely non-conservative comments about Affirmative Action and Slavery Reparations. He's a candidate of opportunity, and the GOP in Illinois was doomed the minute that Ryan's character was exposed. There is No Way Obama loses this unless he contracts a disease and dies ...

Actually, in this state, he'd probably win by a bigger margin since it would be a direct appeal to a sizeable portion of the electorate: the dead.

21 posted on 09/28/2004 7:34:07 PM PDT by alancarp (When does it cease to be "Freedom of the Press" and become outright SEDITION?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

We'll take it.

Bring friends.


22 posted on 09/28/2004 7:34:20 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Who has the other 49? Got a link?

Obama leads by 51 points in the latest Chicago Tribune poll. Keyes' support drops to 17 percent, Tribune poll says. According to this poll, Obama leads Keyes by a margin of 68% to 17%.

23 posted on 09/28/2004 7:34:36 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

So, you'd rather have Obama, eh?


24 posted on 09/28/2004 7:34:57 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: malakhi

He's not even getting all the GOP vote.


25 posted on 09/28/2004 7:35:54 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

keyes got ripped for moving to illinois to run....but the media in chicago isn't ripping obamasama for moving out of state....

ryan could have had a shot....if he would have stayed in...

i really think he could have gotten the swinger vote....


26 posted on 09/28/2004 7:36:13 PM PDT by dreamerintexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: alancarp
No, he's simply being realistic.

Back in Revolutionary War days, 'realists' were called Tories.

27 posted on 09/28/2004 7:36:19 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Waywardson

Important ping...


28 posted on 09/28/2004 7:37:12 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Whose side are you on?

The side of not posting useless vanities.

29 posted on 09/28/2004 7:37:20 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dreamerintexas

Edgar was the only person who could have won.


30 posted on 09/28/2004 7:37:48 PM PDT by RWR8189 (Its Morning in America Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Ping...


31 posted on 09/28/2004 7:37:50 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Of course not. But (1) We're GONNA have Obama. Period. That's the realism part -- Obama may be the biggest Senate winner in the Country on Nov 2; and (2) if I have precious time and money to spend on a candidate, it's on a contested race -- like my Burr vs. Bowles contest in NC. It's still winnable.


32 posted on 09/28/2004 7:38:22 PM PDT by alancarp (When does it cease to be "Freedom of the Press" and become outright SEDITION?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
We are doing the hard work of rebuilding.

Is Mr. Keyes planning on staying in Illinois after the November election?

33 posted on 09/28/2004 7:38:36 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: malakhi

keyes won't stay in illinois after the election....but neither will obama (the seiu candidate)


34 posted on 09/28/2004 7:39:54 PM PDT by dreamerintexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Let me know when he hits 20% in the polls, that may be moral victory time for Alan.

Big stupid mistake for Illinois Republicans. A hamster would have gotten more votes.


35 posted on 09/28/2004 7:39:59 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Tax Protesters without SSN's are complete and total LOSERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Who has the other 49? Got a link?

Actually, the last poll I saw was a Survey USA poll showing a 65-24 edge for Obama. Remember, the poster said a 51 point margin.
36 posted on 09/28/2004 7:40:35 PM PDT by Hurricane Andrew (History teaches that wars begin when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
A hamster would have gotten more votes.

Hamtaro for Senate! :o)


37 posted on 09/28/2004 7:41:23 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: malakhi

He is cute! And probably has a better grasp on reality! Where can I donate?


38 posted on 09/28/2004 7:42:37 PM PDT by Central Scrutiniser (Tax Protesters without SSN's are complete and total LOSERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: malakhi

It's not useless. We're trying to elect conservatives.

Why don't you go pick on Daschle or something...


39 posted on 09/28/2004 7:45:59 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Barack Obama is the worst Senate candidate in U.S. history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

"If...the race looks tight by November I'll vote for Keyes, but I just don't see it happening."

Why wouldn't you vote for him anyway? I still remember when Giuliani ran the second time (when he won for the first time) and my liberal friend and I actually knew more people who were going to vote for the Conservative Party candidate than for Giuliani. That was all because of the candidates views on abortion, but it was interesting, esp. for my friend who learned her Jewish co-worker was a staunch, single-issue, pro-life voter. But that was just anecdotal, as history records it Rudy won.

But who will you vote for if Keyes looks a loser? Obama? Some other person? There is NO SUCH THING as a thrown away vote!


40 posted on 09/28/2004 7:47:02 PM PDT by jocon307 (Ann Coulter was right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-338 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson