Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry Pins Hopes in Iowa on Big Vote From Absentees [heads up]
New York Times ^ | Sep 28, 2004 | R.W. Apple, Jr.

Posted on 09/27/2004 8:55:34 PM PDT by Mike Fieschko

DES MOINES, Sept. 26 - They're off and voting in Iowa, even before all the corn has been harvested.

In the state's 20 most populous counties, which account for about 60 percent of the vote, more than 140,345 absentee ballots had been applied for as of last Wednesday, according to a survey of county auditors by The Des Moines Register. Under Iowa law, anyone can request an absentee ballot, no questions asked, and roughly three times as many Democrats as Republicans did so in the counties studied by The Register. Early voting began on Thursday, 40 days before Election Day.

Which is one reason Gov. Tom Vilsack, a Democrat, is optimistic about John Kerry's chances of carrying the state. Four years ago, Al Gore was outvoted at the polls; his entire 4,144-vote margin of victory in Iowa was from absentee voters.

If he is to win, Mr. Kerry can ill afford to lose states that Mr. Gore won, like Iowa and Wisconsin, two Midwestern battlegrounds.

Most polls show President Bush with a small advantage here (a Mason-Dixon survey, reported last week, had him up, 48 percent to 42 percent, with a margin of error of four percentage points), and both parties are still pressing hard.

On Thursday, John Edwards, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee, spoke in Cedar Rapids in close-fought eastern Iowa, and two surrogates for Mr. Bush spoke in the same area last week, his wife, Laura Bush on Friday in Eldridge and Senator Rick Santorum, Republican of Pennsylvania, on Saturday in Davenport.

"At the end of the day, it's a very simple thing - Iraq," Mr. Edwards said, perhaps mindful of Iowa's long tradition of supporting antiwar politicians. "George Bush made this mess, and he can't fix it."

Mr. Vilsack said in an interview at the Governor's Mansion that that was the right approach - "a nice, tight strategy, with the candidates focusing on Iraq and their message reinforced by television ads and the daily pounding of the news from Iraq" - because "everyone knows what a disaster Iraq is."

Unlike the case with many other ranking Democrats, he argued that Mr. Kerry's timing was perfect.

"This campaign is like one of those classic John Elway games," the governor said. "The team with the ball at the end of the game wins. You can't surge too early, or you give the ball back, and you can't do that with Karl Rove and George Bush. They're too sharp. If you give them the ball back, they'll go down the field and score."

Normally, Iowa's seven electoral votes are not enough to attract the candidates' attention. This state's usual time in the political spotlight comes at the beginning of the campaign year, in midwinter, not toward the end.

Once the caucuses, Iowa's version of a primary, are completed in January, the state falls off the political map. But this is no normal year, and even small packets of electoral votes are very precious.

"It feels like ground zero here, and it has felt like that for nine months," said Kenneth M. Quinn, a retired diplomat who is president of the World Food Prize Foundation, based in Des Moines. "Both parties are clearly putting an enormous premium on the state, with a visit from someone or other almost every day and an endless barrage of TV ads. It's only seven electoral votes, but it could well be the decisive seven."

Mr. Kerry won the caucuses this year after Howard Dean faltered and Representative Richard A. Gephardt's broad labor support proved insufficient to carry him to victory. So Mr. Kerry is well known to Iowa's electorate, perhaps as well known as Mr. Bush.

But Dennis J. Goldford, an associate professor in the politics and international relations department at Drake University, said the Democrat had "run a remarkably incoherent campaign, which raises grave doubts about his ability to mount a comeback."

As for Mr. Kerry's emphasis on Iraq, Iowans are dovish enough, Professor Goldford said, but in the polls taken to date, "Kerry doesn't get the support of all the people here who think Iraq is a mess."

"To oust an incumbent,'' he added, "you have to make the point that he has created a mess. But you also have to show that you have the ideas and the gravitas to clean it up, and so far Kerry hasn't done that."

David Yepsen, longtime political expert for The Register, said he sensed another problem for Mr. Kerry, rural voters. Mr. Bush has been gaining support in the countryside, Mr. Yepsen said, "because there's a cultural disconnect between the chainsaw gang and the windsurfer," meaning Mr. Kerry, on religious issues, as well as social ones.

The number of farm families is declining precipitously, even in Iowa, but the number of rural voters, some retired and some with jobs in the city, remains highly significant.

So the Democrats' efforts to promote absentee voting could be crucial to Mr. Kerry. For months, they have been sending young canvassers door to door to interview people who otherwise might not vote. They have been searching, Mr. Vilsack said, for potential voters who have children serving in Iraq or who have lost jobs or feel trapped on an economic treadmill or who are worried about the mounting cost of health care.

"There are tens of thousands of people like that," the governor continued. "When the interviewer finds them, he encourages them to apply for an absentee ballot, helps them if they need help and punches their names and their concerns into a Palm Pilot. Then at the end of the day he transmits the information back to our database."

Phyllis Peters, a spokeswoman for the secretary of state, said that as of Thursday, 199,593 absentee ballots had been applied for through the 99 counties.

No one doubts the efficiency of the operation. Representative Jim Leach, an Iowa City Republican who described the presidential outlook here as "murky, fractionally favoring the president," said the Democrats' absentee effort was "the one thing that gives Kerry a better chance than the polls give him."

The Iowa Democratic Party, Mr. Leach said, "has now become the single best organized political party in the entire country."

The question is whether the Democrats will actually succeed in attracting voters to the polls who otherwise would have stayed at home, thus increasing their overall total, or whether they are simply churning the same pool of voters, persuading people to vote absentee who would otherwise have showed up to vote.

Some Republicans speculate that the Democrats want to lock up as many of their votes as possible before the televised debates begin on Thursday, in the event that Mr. Kerry does not do well against Mr. Bush.

One reason Mr. Gore may have run better among absentee voters, Mr. Vilsack speculated, was that most of them did not witness what were widely considered lackluster showings by the vice president in that year's debates.

David Roederer, the Bush chairman in Iowa, asserted that the absentee campaign "won't mean a thing" in the end.

"If you vote them early, you can't vote them late, because you only have so many supporters," Mr. Roederer said, expressing doubt that the Democrats could encourage many new voters signed up. "We're concentrating on Election Day, and we'll beat them there.

"If they get 40,000 more absentees, it won't be decisive. If the spread goes up to 100,000, of course, that would be a different story."


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004election; 2004electionfraud; absenteeballots; absenteevoters; brownshirtsforkerry; election2004; electionlaws; howtostealanelection; iowavotefraud; iowavoters; noquestionsasked; thefixisin; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Mike Fieschko
I got one of those recored message calls telling me that the 'Rats (MoveOn, Americans Coming Together, etc...) are behind a move to get people to vote absentee, and act as the courier to return the ballots - and the call suggested to only return the ballot yourself, in person, or mail it yourself if voting absentee - and not to trust the 'Rats and their stooges.
21 posted on 09/27/2004 9:27:49 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (At CBS - "We don't just report news - we make it - up.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
...roughly three times as many Democrats as Republicans did so in the counties studied by The Register.>/i> Did you catch the key words here? "...in the counties studied...." If they are like your typical msm, they selected counties heavily populated with Democrats.
22 posted on 09/27/2004 9:28:18 PM PDT by no dems (Saddam Hussein, himself, was a Weapon of Mass Destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
...roughly three times as many Democrats as Republicans did so in the counties studied by The Register. Did you catch the key words here? "...in the counties studied...." If they are like your typical msm, they selected counties heavily populated with Democrats.
23 posted on 09/27/2004 9:28:57 PM PDT by no dems (Saddam Hussein, himself, was a Weapon of Mass Destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: petertare
Yes the phoney state election guy (cannot recall demorat shiftys name) will deny such happenings--will not even respond to e-mails.

His name is Chet Culver, Secretary of State. He's the son of former Senator John Culver and he wants to be the next Governor of Iowa.

24 posted on 09/27/2004 9:30:14 PM PDT by Iowa Granny (Proud to be associated with pajama wearing news gatherers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
One reason Mr. Gore may have run better among absentee voters, Mr. Vilsack speculated, was that most of them did not witness what were widely considered lackluster showings by the vice president in that year's debates.

Hard to "witness" a debate while already buried six-feet-under.

25 posted on 09/27/2004 9:30:30 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

I hope someone maintains a database on those absentee ballots to check for possible double voting in places like Florida or Pennsylvania.

You must have read my mind. I know, didn't take long either!
Jack


26 posted on 09/27/2004 9:32:15 PM PDT by btcusn (Giving up the right to arms is a mistake a free people get to make only once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SolomoninSouthDakota
Don't believe these aren't votes the dems are putting in the bank already. A am astounded by the cavalier response of the Rep. official.

Agree completely -

27 posted on 09/27/2004 9:32:59 PM PDT by Khaosai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

The state GOP has an aggressive absentee plan. Trust me. They do.


28 posted on 09/27/2004 9:38:29 PM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Merry

Kerry is going to win this election because of voter fraud, unless the Republicans can do something about it in the short time remaining. Please do what you can now to alert anybody with any authority. If we know of voter fraud scheming, I have to believe the power-brokers and legal people on our side know. But, who knows?


29 posted on 09/27/2004 9:42:44 PM PDT by line drive to right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Guys, I think we are in trouble. The amount of fraud that is going to come our way is gonna be HUGH. I am scared by ut, frankly.


30 posted on 09/27/2004 9:43:52 PM PDT by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
Note the word "after" here: "Mr. Kerry won the caucuses this year after Howard Dean faltered and Representative Richard A. Gephardt's broad labor support proved insufficient..."

I've always wondered if there was something fishy in how Kerry won Iowa. Dean hadn't yet faltered and Gephardt hadn't proved anything when Kerry suddenly turned out the winner.

31 posted on 09/27/2004 9:46:36 PM PDT by Graymatter (Reload Bush/Cheney 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faithincowboys
Must you always be so negative?

If Bush continues to do as well as he has been, then voter fraud isn't going to make any difference. Only when an election is close can fraud actually steal it.

32 posted on 09/27/2004 9:47:28 PM PDT by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Right on. And, folks, you can't really take R.W. "Johnny" Apple seriously, can you?


33 posted on 09/27/2004 9:49:25 PM PDT by nimbysrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter
If you remember, the polls before the Hawkeye-"Cacueye" showed that Dean's support was falling and that Gephardt and Kerry were moving ahead. It wasn't a real surprise that Dean didn't win. He imploded in the days before the caucuses, especially when he told the old guy to "Sit".
34 posted on 09/27/2004 9:49:51 PM PDT by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny

Well let us hope that these "old voters" aren't so old that they are already in that dirt....nut little would surprise me.

My point earlier was that people that are "urged" to vote absentee - rather than seeing a real need to do so on their own - might be less likely to actually return the ballot.

I worry about people with multiple homes voting absentee in one state and in person in the other...these RATS will try anything. I hope the "powers that be" in the GOP learned SOMETHING from 2000....

Even having volunteered, I have this helpless feeling since my state is so darn red anyway...I think I could do more good elsewhere.


35 posted on 09/27/2004 9:52:41 PM PDT by Kylie_04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Bull. Besides all the other cheating by the Democoms in 2000 Florida, Bush somehow had 15,000 fewer votes counted for him in Palm Beach County than did the Republican candidate for the U.S. House. That just does not happen, where a somewhat popular Pres. candidate is swamped in vote count by a congressional candidate from his own party. That event is according to the esteemed John Fund of the Wall Street Journal. He has a book out on vote fraud.


36 posted on 09/27/2004 9:53:34 PM PDT by line drive to right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Merry

Some people just want a paper trail.

However, do these have to be notarized or witnessed?


37 posted on 09/27/2004 10:03:04 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Go to Newsmax!!! You really need to get some courage. Do you think Rove is worried about it? And if everything is so perfect, don't go to the polls. Just stay home and eat popcorn.


38 posted on 09/27/2004 10:13:06 PM PDT by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Yes, I know. I don't trust state polls, or the media that report them. Supposedly Kerry just suddenly saw an opening and went into it like Seabiscuit. Maybe. But it was all very sudden and the Vilsack friendship was all so conveeeenient :)


39 posted on 09/27/2004 10:29:14 PM PDT by Graymatter (Reload Bush/Cheney 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
I don't know how it works in Iowa, but I know how it works along the border. The candidate, and or his machine go out and recruit registered voters, and register new voters, to request early ballots. In some cases the early ballots are requested to be sent to a member of the machine, who then takes the ballots to the voters for them to sign, then the carrier marks the ballot, and takes it to elections. The candidate can get a list of the early ballots sent out each day, they know what day the voter will get the ballot, they show up at the voter's house that day, pick up, and mark the ballot, and turn them in. Some of these people turn in stacks of ballots every day.

Yes these candidates are Democrats, the interesting thing is that this is also done in the primarys, when the opponent is a Democrat. In most cases both candidates are doing it.

People who were not registered to vote have been caught going into the polls, look at the book of registered voters, and give the name of someone on the list, get their ballot, and vote. Has anyone been prosecuted for any of these offences? Of course not, we can't offend anyone.

40 posted on 09/27/2004 10:30:11 PM PDT by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson