Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mike Fieschko
Note the word "after" here: "Mr. Kerry won the caucuses this year after Howard Dean faltered and Representative Richard A. Gephardt's broad labor support proved insufficient..."

I've always wondered if there was something fishy in how Kerry won Iowa. Dean hadn't yet faltered and Gephardt hadn't proved anything when Kerry suddenly turned out the winner.

31 posted on 09/27/2004 9:46:36 PM PDT by Graymatter (Reload Bush/Cheney 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Graymatter
If you remember, the polls before the Hawkeye-"Cacueye" showed that Dean's support was falling and that Gephardt and Kerry were moving ahead. It wasn't a real surprise that Dean didn't win. He imploded in the days before the caucuses, especially when he told the old guy to "Sit".
34 posted on 09/27/2004 9:49:51 PM PDT by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson