[AmericanMade1776]

The article is titled, "Did The President Lie About Iraq?". Unless there was a change overnight, the president is still President Bush. My original post stands, PRESIDENT BUSH DOES NOT LIE. Seems like the fools are the ones who titled the article wrong.

That is what I thought, the title of the article should of been.... DID FORMER PRESIDENT CLINTON LIE ABUOT IRAQ?

[beezdotcom]

That is what I thought, the title of the article should of been.... DID FORMER PRESIDENT CLINTON LIE ABUOT IRAQ?

I'm eagerly awaiting a copy of your email to gopusa.com where you admonish them about the title of their article (which was referenced by this thread)...

[SmellsLikeOwen]

No it shouldn't have been!! That's what makes this article so great!
There is this thing in the world, and one day you may run into it, just be careful that it doesn't reach up and bite you on the butt! It's called sarcasm, walk cautiously, and keep an ever watchful eye.....

Cheers!

[RebelDS]

The title is correct. As if I made the statement "the president was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald", I would be making a correct statement. The title is a past tense statement and is not specific to which president. It is that way intentionally to mislead you into thinking it's about Bush and then gets you at the end. The point of it is to have those DU's agreeing with the writer that "the president" lied and then catch them at the end when they realize he was talking about Clinton all along.