Sorry, just had to fix this one.
The Ellsberg POS should have been tried and executed, for treason, back in the 70s.
ping
The U.S. invasion of Iraq has destabilized the Middle East and made Americans more vulnerable to terrorist attacks at home, Ellsberg said.
Danny boy is one of those who prefers the quasi-stability of dictators to the temporary difficulties along the road to democracy and true stability. In other words, he has no stomach for rigors of hard work. He prefers to tear down rather than build.
Tens of thousands, perhapses more, lay buried in Saddam's mass graves and Ellsberg the Rotten finds the problem to be "an administration that has acted like this ... that are costing many lives." As I said, the cretin is devoid of logic.
As if we didn't just discredited some Army memos....
Back to the Vietnam mentality.
treason
It pretty amazing, and telling, that Ellsberg and a few other anti-war backstabbers, who did everything they could to undermine support for the Vietnam war, have suddenly awoken from their long slumber, crawled out from under their various rocks and now support John Kerry.
I love people like Ellsburg's reasoning. To wit Al-Qaeda is a severe threat to our country, so therefore we shouldn't be fighting them in Iraq. But these clowns further contradict themselves. First they say that fighting terrorists is legitimate (if they're not in Iraq), but then they claim by fighting them we are creating more of them so maybe we shouldn't fight them. How does Ellsburg know that we didn't create more terrorists when we ousted the Taliban? Why would toppling Hussein create more terrorists than getting rid of the Taliban a government that sponsored terrorist orgs like Al-Qaeda? And is he saying that if you perceive a threat to your country, don't react to it because you might make more enemies? Ellsburg's "logic" escapes me.
It's coming to the big push. All of the Traitors, Communist Socialist from the 1930's up to today are coming out to win for themselves a place in history by publicly taking over the democrat party of the U.S.
From these days forward, if the U.S. is to remain a free country the citizens will have to fight harder, organize more, and donate money for that purpose. The fight for freedom is now in the U.S. not in a foreign country. The U.S. may later have to go outside of it's borders for money to remain free and to fight these Communist Socialist that has become so powerful here in the U.S.A.
All of the cockroaches of your generation are crawling out of their hiding spaces. Thank you, John Kerry.
Does anybody have a giant can of RAID?
That's not surprising given that media coverage of Vietnam was universally NEGATIVE. At that point, folks had been led to believe that the Tet Offensive was successful for the NVA, when it was exactly the opposite. CBS and Walter Cronkite (the most trusted newsman in the US, HAH) led this effort. Too bad the Pajama Warriors were not in force back then!
Veterans who were villified will finally get their due; I think many Vietnam vets can't WAIT to vote against Kerry, the weasel.
This raises a legitimate issue. Where should our civil servants place their loyalty and thus dictate their behavior particuarly when it involves national security issues? The government even when they engage in coverups and fibbing to the American public? At what point is it wrong for a person to keep his mouth shut even when faced with govt deception aka Waco/Kosovo/ect?
This guy needs to be arrested for treason!