Good one, Fred! :^D
Posted on 09/25/2004 11:49:28 AM PDT by RWR8189
THE QUESTION no longer is whether Democrats can win back the Senate, now controlled 51-49 by Republicans. The prospect of a Democratic takeover was always remote and has recently become more so. The question now is how much can President Bush, should he defeat John Kerry by 5 percentage points or more, help Republican Senate candidates, assuming there's a coattail effect. And that leads to the more important question of how many seats Republicans might pick up. As many as four or five, or none at all?
The trend at the moment is favorable to Republicans, but nothing is guaranteed. Of the top ten vulnerable seats for either party, Republicans are all but assured of gaining two now held by Democrats (South Carolina and Georgia) and lead in a third (Louisiana). Of these same ten, Democrats are confident of winning only one Republican seat (Illinois). Democrats lead in three more states, one now in Republican hands (Oklahoma) and two currently Democratic seats (Florida and North Carolina). The other three are tossups.
Republicans started with one big advantage: Nine of the top ten races are in red (Bush) states, notably five in the South now held by Democrats. There's a new advantage: the presidential candidates. Bush is welcomed by Republican candidates as a boon to their campaigns. Kerry is treated like a pariah by Democratic candidates. Even Senate minority leader Tom Daschle has rejected him, running a TV ad showing Daschle and Bush hugging. "The remarkable thing about it is how quickly he was willing to throw John Kerry overboard in order to help himself in South Dakota," said Daschle's Republican foe John Thune on Meet the Press on September 19. "I mean, I don't know very many party leaders that would do what he just did." Bush is expected to win South Dakota by 20 points or more.
Let's look first at the slam-dunk races. South Carolina is now a solidly Republican (and conservative) state, which makes Rep. Jim DeMint the prohibitive favorite over Democrat Inez Tenenbaum. Georgia, too, has rapidly trended Republican, which means Rep. Johnny Isakson is a shoo-in. Illinois is the opposite of Georgia--one of the few states that's moved in a Democratic direction. Barack Obama, whose speech was a big hit at the Democratic convention, should have no trouble defeating Alan Keyes, recruited from Maryland as the Republican candidate.
Among closer contests where one candidate enjoys a visible lead, the most worrisome for Republicans is in Oklahoma. Former representative Tom Coburn, who kept his promise to limit his terms to three, took an early lead over Democratic representative Brad Carson, then lost it with impolitic utterances.
Carson is probably the best Democratic candidate in the country. He broadcast a TV ad endorsing a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, thus denying Coburn a pivotal issue in a very conservative state. A Rasmussen poll shows Bush ahead in Oklahoma by 25 points and Carson by 5. To pull Coburn in, Bush may have to win by 30 points or more, a not impossible feat.
North Carolina is the home of Democratic veep candidate John Edwards, but Bush could win the state by a large enough margin to pull Rep. Richard Burr to victory in the Senate race. The Burr campaign got off to a slow start and only now is effectively challenging wealthy Democrat Erskine Bowles, who was trounced by Sen. Elizabeth Dole in 2002. Bowles, once President Clinton's chief of staff, spent $7 million of his own money against Dole and may open his wallet again. The Bush landslide in North Carolina (Bush won by 13 points) broke late in 2000. A win of that proportion this year should rescue Burr.
In Florida, ex-Housing secretary Mel Martinez won a brutal Republican primary and stands a realistic chance of overtaking Democrat Betty Castor. Martinez trailed last week by six points in one poll, by a single point in another. Hurricanes kept politics out of the news for much of September. Now, however, President Bush appears to be expanding his small lead in the state and Martinez may follow. Castor is a centrist Democrat, perfect for Florida. But she's been zinged for her role as University of South Florida president in not firing professor Sami Al-Arian, who's been indicted for aiding terrorists. This is not a marginal issue. She ran a television spot defending herself on the matter. Martinez aims to turn out a huge Latino vote. If he succeeds, he wins.
Republican representative David Vitter has gradually widened his lead in Louisiana, a state that Kerry has now conceded to Bush. But he's unlikely to reach 50 percent in the state's jungle primary on November 2, forcing him into a runoff in December. He'd rather face liberal state treasurer John Kennedy than the more conservative Rep. Christopher John. And, lucky for Vitter, Kennedy was endorsed last week by the most important black Democrat in the state, Rep. William Jefferson. If Vitter wins the seat being vacated by John Breaux, he'd become the first Republican since Reconstruction to represent Louisiana in the Senate.
The toss-ups? We'll start with Colorado, where Republican Pete Coors, the beer baron, has gained parity with Democratic state attorney general Ken Salazar. Coors has never run before, but he's turned out to be a capable candidate. Tall and gray-haired, he looks like a senator. The bad news for him is that Bush is running only slightly ahead of Kerry in Colorado and Salazar is a proven vote-getter. But if Bush improves, Coors may as well.
In Alaska, Republican senator Lisa Murkowski is looking stronger than almost anyone expected. She is currently tied with former Democratic governor Tony Knowles. He has won statewide twice, but never when Republicans were united behind a single candidate, as they are now. Murkowski was famously appointed to her father's Senate seat--by her father, Gov. Frank Murkowski. This was an unpopular move. But Alaska is a Republican state that Bush may win more lopsidedly than Kerry does in Massachusetts. If that doesn't lift Murkowski to victory, nothing will.
Finally, there's conservative South Dakota, stomping grounds of liberal Tom Daschle, who's fighting for his political life. Daschle looks more beatable than his fellow Democratic senator Tim Johnson was in 2002. Johnson barely edged out John Thune, but Thune leads Daschle by three points in one poll. In their scintillating debate on Meet the Press, Thune called Daschle a tool of liberal special interests and Daschle labeled Thune a rubber stamp for Bush. This is another state Bush will win handily. To help Thune, it better be a landslide.
I've left out an eleventh Senate race, Rep. George Nethercutt's challenge of Democratic senator Patty Murray in Washington. Murray is a drab liberal, but hard to beat in a blue state like Washington. A Nethercutt win would be a bonus for Republicans, the product of a national sweep that elects Republicans almost everywhere. It's possible, but no more so than a string of victories that gives control of the Senate back to Democrats and Tom Daschle. Don't count on it. But sometimes wonders never cease.
Fred Barnes is executive editor of The Weekly Standard.
I think you're slightly more pessimistic than I on NC, FL and CO, but too optimistic on WI and WA. WI is a loss and WA too. In order of Republican likeliness, I'd say it's CO, FL, NC, WA, WI. Beware Florida polls, they were horrible in 2002.
I don't see any discussion of the Kentucky race. Jim Bunning won by less than 7,000 votes the first time. I take it he's considered a safe bet for re-election.
I've never understood why the losing party voters would be less likely to turn out than the winning voters.
BMP
While Republican victories are clearly very probably in NC, FL, and CO (I think I've had each one as Slight or Lean Rep. at one point or another), they are all tossups as it stands. Bowles and Castor have been polling much higher than expected, and Coors has been polling much lower.
I am very wary of Florida polls right now, as the conservative Panhandle is likely not even being polled, as half the folks there still haven't recovered from Ivan. With Jeanne on the way, I doubt Florida polls will be accurate for another few weeks or so.
Personally, being in Florida, I would be very surprised to see Castor win. But Martinez's last-minute primary nastiness with McCollum may have caused some damage.
Frankly, who knows?
Good one, Fred! :^D
Jim Bunning is safe, as are other close races from last time (Kit Bond, Harry Reid)
Any state dumb enough to re-elect patty murray doesn't belong in the union.
Glad to hear that Bunning is safe. I wasn't too worried--no person who has ever pitched a perfect game in the major leagues has ever been defeated for re-election to the U.S. Senate.
Super Majority, LOL, maybe?
I feel the same about Fred. I always enjoy when he gets fired up during Brit's panel discussions. I also agree with you about Mort. Fred and him seem to have a real strong friendship.
hahahahaha I bet they would be!!....
They both are such fine men.. like our daddys.. I love them both and they tickle me on this show!
If we win Pa and NJ early in the evening because of the eastern time zone, that will start and avalanche of demoralization for the libs and we will end up with 398 ev and 60 senators.
My prediction.
I think you are wrong on Vitter for the simple reason that he has positioned himself well with public stances on Medicare and term limits, etc. I think he will win in the run off, though narrowly. 53-47.
The original plan, by Huey Long,
No, not Long. It was Edwin Washington Edwards of Crowley, LA (like Breaux and Chris John), but now an inmate at the federal penitentiary in Fort Worth.
Patty Murray is the one who first attracted the "soccer moms." Wasn't the term coined for her 1992 race?
Don't worry about confusing Huey Pierce Long, Jr., with Edwin Washington Edwards. Edwards would like the comparison, and Long would laughingly point out how he was a much smarter politician than Edwards (though he was not in office as long) because at least he never went to the slammer! Now those were two Democrats that only Louisiana could love.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
