Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My Checking Account Was Hacked or Hijacked, Need Help

Posted on 09/25/2004 8:46:25 AM PDT by John Robertson

What is "net angels," or www.netangel.com?


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: checkingaccount; hacked; unauthorized
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: HairOfTheDog

I think there are two issues here - credit card (or checking account) fraud and computer security. I don't see the problem in addressing both issues since they can be related if you conduct any money transactions online.

I guess I'm assuming since the business calls itself "net angels" that it is some internet-related business, meaning the fraud originated with getting his bank account number online. I could be wrong.

And if you don't think spyware can find account numbers you've stored in your PC, I think you are mistaken. I don't pay any bills online because I don't trust that my account information isn't being read or made available. If I don't open up the path for people to access my bank account, unauthorized users can't get into it.


61 posted on 09/25/2004 11:05:51 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (Let's REALLY Split The Country! (http://righteverytime3.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: John Robertson

Who to contact if you suspect fraud: (web sites with info)

www.sec.gov/enforce/complaint

www.vam.fbi.gov

www.ifccfbi.gov - internet fraud complaint center

www.worldwidescam.com/ - world wide scam listings

www.stockdetective.com/ - self policing

Look for the little lock icon at the bottom or top of your Internet browser screen. When the
padlock icon shows locked then Credit Cards and other financial transactions are protected

Download this .pdf file on internet fraud..

http://www.phoenixhecht.com/PDF/InternetFraud.pdf


62 posted on 09/25/2004 11:07:43 AM PDT by Drammach (Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
I don't see the problem in addressing both issues since they can be related if you conduct any money transactions online.

The problem is that it's distracting bafflecrap. There is no gold mine or file of banking account numbers on my personal computer that has some record of all of my transactions online. The gold mine is in the general security of the companies you deal with, and that risk is there no matter how you use your card, whether is it over the phone, at the store, or over the internet. It is ~their~ records that are the gold mine, not your own machine. Internet security and firewalls save you from viruses and worms that are general hassles, but those hassles have to do with harm to your computer, not your bank account.

63 posted on 09/25/2004 11:13:05 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog (John Kerry... Almost as presidential as Jane Fonda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
...your first response is to ~mock~ him for using Internet Explorer.

Now that's just bull crap. There was no mocking going on, and I mentioned FireFox in my LAST sentence. I didn't say he MUST use it and I didn't mock him in any way for not. I merely offered a technique that I use to keep this spy crap off my machine in the first place.

Fact is most spyware enters a machine when using MicroSoft Internet Explorer. This spyware can send CC#s and debit card #s back to the malicious/dishonest person who sent them. No doubt CC and debit card numbers are handled by the kid at the gas station and there is a possibility for theft there too. I never said there wasn't. There's not much one can do about that. However, one CAN be proactive and take precautions on ones computer, and that is all I was talking about. True, a NAT firewall is probably not a concern in this instance, but whenever discussing securing a computer I think it is a good idea to mention all the parts.

64 posted on 09/25/2004 11:21:23 AM PDT by Musket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Musket
...your first response is to ~mock~ him for using Internet Explorer.

Now that's just bull crap.

To: John Robertson

Ummm. lemme guess. You're using MicroSoft Internet Explorer and NO firewall software. Am I right?

26 posted on 09/25/2004 9:06:44 AM PDT by Musket

65 posted on 09/25/2004 11:33:15 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog (John Kerry... Almost as presidential as Jane Fonda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
You are correct. I'm not sure where anyone would get that "GB" stands for Great Brittan in a URL.
66 posted on 09/25/2004 11:37:14 AM PDT by TheBattman (Islam - the cult of Satan - The DemocRAT Party= Acolytes of SATAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MichelleWSC

FDIC doesn't cover fraud.


67 posted on 09/25/2004 11:41:07 AM PDT by al_again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: codercpc

FDIC protects account holders from the bank. It kicks in if the bank goes under. So unless your bank goes into receivership, FDIC is not apllicable.


68 posted on 09/25/2004 11:43:25 AM PDT by al_again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

I thought it was UK? Is it also GB?


69 posted on 09/25/2004 11:45:06 AM PDT by Casloy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

DOH! I forgot about that post. But I wasn't reallly mocking, I was merely inquiring so as to confirm my suspicions. But I can see how you might interpret that as a mock, so I'll give you one half of one "I'm sorry".


70 posted on 09/25/2004 11:45:45 AM PDT by Musket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Musket

OK then.... :~) see my 63 for why talk of firewalls and browsers in this circumstance distracts from being helpful in the same way that it would distract for me to speak of good locks on the door and a handy sidearm to keep this thievery from happening again.


71 posted on 09/25/2004 11:58:52 AM PDT by HairOfTheDog (John Kerry... Almost as presidential as Jane Fonda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

I was just trying to be helpful, not a distraction. If you want to believe that spyware on individual computers is not transmitting CC #s and debit card #s back to theives, you can believe that. However there's tons of info out there to the contrary.


72 posted on 09/25/2004 12:16:02 PM PDT by Musket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Musket
If you want to believe that spyware on individual computers is not transmitting CC #s and debit card #s back to theives, you can believe that.

OK. There are plenty of good reasons for firewalls and safe internet habits. SOme real, some imagined.

73 posted on 09/25/2004 12:21:49 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog (John Kerry... Almost as presidential as Jane Fonda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: John Robertson
About two weeks ago I had to stop all electronic debit from my checking account. This was paypal they were getting 100.00-300.00 at a time. Total around 1000.00.

Paypal did re-enburse ALL that we protested.

I am back to writing checks, money orders and cash.
74 posted on 09/25/2004 12:24:22 PM PDT by DAVEY CROCKETT (Character exalts Liberty and Freedom, Righteous exalts a Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Musket
I used the Leak Test and the Sheilds Up to test my Armor2Net Firewall I have installed on my computer. My computer shows up as invisible on the internet.

Here is the report I got after running Sheilds Up:

Attempting connection to your computer. . .

Shields UP! is now attempting to contact the Hidden Internet Server within your PC. It is likely that no one has told you that your own personal computer may now be functioning as an Internet Server with neither your knowledge nor your permission. And that it may be serving up all or many of your personal files for reading, writing, modification and even deletion by anyone, anywhere, on the Internet!

Your Internet port 139 does not appear to exist! One or more ports on this system are operating in FULL STEALTH MODE! Standard Internet behavior requires port connection attempts to be answered with a success or refusal response. Therefore, only an attempt to connect to a nonexistent computer results in no response of either kind. But YOUR computer has DELIBERATELY CHOSEN NOT TO RESPOND (that's very cool!) which represents advanced computer and port stealthing capabilities. A machine configured in this fashion is well hardened to Internet NetBIOS attack and intrusion.

Unable to connect with NetBIOS to your computer. All attempts to get any information from your computer have FAILED. (This is very uncommon for a Windows networking-based PC.) Relative to vulnerabilities from Windows networking, this computer appears to be VERY SECURE since it is NOT exposing ANY of its internal NetBIOS networking protocol over the Internet.

If anyone is looking for an excellent and easy to use firewall, I highly recommend Armor2Net. It's free to use for 30 days and only $19.99 to purchase a license.

75 posted on 09/25/2004 12:43:53 PM PDT by jellybean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: John Robertson

Go to the FTC website and click over to identity fraud. Good info.


76 posted on 09/25/2004 12:49:17 PM PDT by DOGEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DAVEY CROCKETT
About two weeks ago I had to stop all electronic debit from my checking account.

I had sort of the reverse thing yesterday. Two weeks ago I wired $1000 from a mutual fund to my checking account. Never received. Sender says everything went OK. Bank says they never saw it. It's in electronic nether land. My checking account had $43 in it and the next check would have bounced -- thank God for letting me check it when I did. Starting a trace Monday.

77 posted on 09/25/2004 12:56:38 PM PDT by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: al_again

Yes...the FDIC does cover loses due to fraud.


78 posted on 09/25/2004 1:45:32 PM PDT by MichelleWSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: al_again
That's crap. I just talked to my sister who is a district manager for Bank of America and I asked her about the FDIC. The original purpose was to cover loses if the bank went under i.e. the depression but was expanded to cover individual loses related to robbery and fraud
79 posted on 09/25/2004 1:49:44 PM PDT by MichelleWSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

I believe with my online bank - if you notify them promptly if any unauthorized activities - they restore the funds. I never go more then 2 or 3 days without logging in to check.


80 posted on 09/25/2004 1:51:36 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson