Posted on 09/24/2004 4:01:38 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Terri ping
As I said on different threads yesterday, I only hope something can be done to find out whose medical experts are correct in this case so that the proper decisions can be made for this woman and her family.
If I were governor of Florida I'd drop Michael Schiavo into the Atlantic about 50 miles out in a bid to stop the hurricanes. (Could work: he sucks, they blow) No downside.
Terri BUMP - we are coming down to the wire. This is not just aboutTerri - it's about whether or not the disabled have a right to live.
Pray. Listen. Do.
Certainly makes a good case for the use of advance directives,does it not? Think of all the assorted 'professionals' making money off this unfortunate event. On the upside, at least her husband didn't use her for sea bass flakes or toss her into a landfill!
Giggle, giggle, huh???? Sorry, we're talking about killing human beings here, and it's sick and evil that one branch of our government can't seem to get enough of it.
FLORIDA LEGISLATORS CAN STILL ACT TO SAVE TERRI SCHINDLER-SCHIAVO
http://www.nrlc.org/euthanasia/ShiavoAlert092304.html
Today’s Florida Supreme Court decision striking down “Terri’s Law” under which Governor Jeb Bush had ordered that she not be starved and dehydrated to death is not necessarily the last word. Although the court struck the protective law down because it overruled the judiciary in one particular case, the way is still open to pass a law that would be generally applicable to people with disabilities, including Terri Schindler-Schiavo.
Currently, the state requires that someone present Florida courts with “clear and convincing evidence” showing that the patient wanted to be denied food and fluids. In the Schiavo case, Terri went six days without food and fluids because the judge ruled that an alleged casual comment fulfilled the clear and convincing evidence standard. A bill introduced earlier this year, the Florida Starvation and Dehydration of Persons with Disabilities Act, would mandate that a decision to put someone to death by starvation or dehydration could only occur if the patient had made the statement under express and informed consent. It is carefully written to be “constitutional” under prior decisions of the Florida Supreme Court.
Concerned Florida citizens are urged to click on http://www.capwiz.com/nrlc/officials/state/?state=FL&lvl=L to contact Florida representatives and senators to urge them to commit to support, in a special session if necessary, enactment of the Florida Starvation and Dehydration of Persons with Disabilities Prevention Act, similar to last year’s S.B. 692, to save Terri Schindler-Schiavo and others like her.
IF YOU ARE NOT A FLORIDA RESIDENT, you may wish to contact:
Senate President James King, Jr.
9485 Regency Square Blvd., Suite 108
Jacksonville, FL 32225-8145
Email: king.james.web@leg.state.fl.us
(904) 727-3600
Fax: (904) 727-3603
This statement may be attributed to Burke J. Balch, J.D., Director of National Right to Life Committee’s Robert Powell Center for Medical Ethics.
See Questions and Answers on Florida Starvation and Dehydration of Persons with Disabilities Act
See text of Florida Starvation and Dehydration of Persons with Disabilities Act
See Wesley Smith column on why informed consent to denial of nutrition and hydration should be required: The Consequences of Casual Conversations
Florida Supreme Court opinion striking down "Terri's Law"
If Terri had expressed a desire not to be kept alive by artificial means, her frame of reference is Karen Ann Quinlan, kept alive on a respirator. Feeding tubes were not considered artificial means at that particular time. Therefore, Terri cannot be condemned by withdrawal of food and hydration because it was not an artifical means during a time she would have made such a statement ... if in fact, she ever did.
I understand that advance directives in FloriDUH aren't binding on the proxy. So you can not "Living Will" against your being killed in a Terriesque fashion.
It could possibly save those after Terri, and that is a very worthwhile thing, but something tells me the FLufflaws will stick in the mud on the Terri case saying something like her rights were cast in stone forever.
Evolving definitions. Lovely ain't they.
M. Schiavo should be ... nevermind. PTL, PTL, PTL, PTL, PTL, PTL, PTL, PTL, PTL, PTL...ahh, better.
As the mother of a severely mentally and physically disabled 20 year old who neither walks nor talks nor feeds herself, and must wear diapers (and who used to have a feeding tube and be on a ventilator for 3 years), I say that you are EXACTLY CORRECT!!!
Terri is being discriminated against---solely because of her disability!!! That violates the ADA!!!!!
It gets better. When Ms. Quinlan's respirator was finally disconnected, she started breathing on her own. So if her case is to be cited as a frame of reference, that would suggest that Terri should be given therapy to take food by mouth.
Progress.
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/larry.king.live/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.