Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
A point to ponder ...

If Terri had expressed a desire not to be kept alive by artificial means, her frame of reference is Karen Ann Quinlan, kept alive on a respirator. Feeding tubes were not considered artificial means at that particular time. Therefore, Terri cannot be condemned by withdrawal of food and hydration because it was not an artifical means during a time she would have made such a statement ... if in fact, she ever did.

9 posted on 09/24/2004 7:30:18 PM PDT by Pegita ('Tis so sweet to trust in Jesus, just to take Him at His Word ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pegita

Evolving definitions. Lovely ain't they.


12 posted on 09/24/2004 11:05:39 PM PDT by drlevy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Pegita
If Terri had expressed a desire not to be kept alive by artificial means, her frame of reference is Karen Ann Quinlan, kept alive on a respirator.

It gets better. When Ms. Quinlan's respirator was finally disconnected, she started breathing on her own. So if her case is to be cited as a frame of reference, that would suggest that Terri should be given therapy to take food by mouth.

15 posted on 09/25/2004 12:03:24 AM PDT by supercat (If Kerry becomes President, nothing bad will happen for which he won't have an excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson