If you go to New York and stand next to me at Ground Zero, I could take you to at least two radical Islamic mosques within walking distance of that site -- mosques that were frequented by terrorists who attacked the World Trade Center in both 1993 and 2001. Those mosques are still there today, and quite frankly the only thing that has really changed is that there are different radical Muslims in their congregations.
It seems awfully odd to me that this is the case, especially when everyone seems to agree that this nation is supposed to be fighting "a war for our very survival."
You apparently don't like the Bush Doctrine of taking on the source of the terrorists, especially if it requires military force. Have I got that right?
You would fight the war by demolishing mosques here in the US. Have I got that right?
In hindsight, had we begun that practice in, say 1996, would that have prevented 9/11?