Replies

Okay, I'm willing to suspend my condemnation of you while I replace it with utter bewilderment.

You apparently don't like the Bush Doctrine of taking on the source of the terrorists, especially if it requires military force. Have I got that right?

You would fight the war by demolishing mosques here in the US. Have I got that right?

In hindsight, had we begun that practice in, say 1996, would that have prevented 9/11?

I don't think the Bush Doctrine really involves "taking on the source of terrorism," do you? If that were the case, the U.S. would be engaged in military operations in places like London, Rome, Hamburg, Marseilles . . . and, yes -- Jersey City, New Jersey.

Consider this little news item that showed up here on FR today:

The leader of Ohio’s largest mosque has been stripped of his citizenship as punishment for a terrorism-related conviction but can’t be deported until a federal court hears his appeal, which could take 18 months.

It doesn't sound to me like this guy is being treated as an enemy -- especially an enemy in a war on which "the very survival of this nation" hinges. He ought to be deported tomorrow -- and dropped on his country of origin from an altitude of 35,000 feet.

You would fight the war by demolishing mosques here in the US. Have I got that right?

Isn't that where the enemy lurks here in this country?