Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shryke
"A ten kiloton weapon?"

The size of a nuclear weapon in the hands of terrorists would matter less than where and how it was deployed.  Had I no education in such matters I'd probably scoff the alarm this proliferation expert is sounding.  Up until five or six years ago I'd have scoffed the suggestion airliners could bring down modern skyscrapers too.

93 posted on 09/22/2004 2:02:41 PM PDT by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: backtothestreets; fiftymegaton

I'd agree you might get into the 100's of thousands dead. But not millions. Not with 10kt weapon.


96 posted on 09/22/2004 2:10:44 PM PDT by Shryke (Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: backtothestreets
The size of a nuclear weapon in the hands of terrorists would matter less than where and how it was deployed.

Like a autoimmune disease, the reaction to terrorism is worse than terrorism itself. After 9/11, the effect of the security measures and the fear of flying caused more damage to the airline industry than the initial attack.

103 posted on 09/22/2004 2:32:32 PM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson