To: hchutch
Conn, sonar, new troll contact bearing 190. Can't say for sure, but it looks like we hit a paleo from Buchananville... Hey, that's not fair to the Buchananites. Buchanan himself said he would rather that Bush win than Kerry. I would say that those in blow-out states should vote their conscience. Those in close states have to consider the flood of Supreme Court picks that the '04 winner WILL make. Off topic, but if "W" wins, I would recommend that if the Senate (thanks to Specter and Snowe) won't ratify his judges, that he should just leave the spots vacant. It would be sort of a "reverse packing" scheme. Eventually we would have a Supreme ourt with Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy (unfortunately, the traitor is too young). Wouldn't you love to see all of those 2-1 decisions?
55 posted on
09/22/2004 6:07:07 AM PDT by
sittnick
(There's no salvation in politics.)
To: sittnick
Great post. I've been advocating the "reverse packing" concept ever since the Democrat stonewalling process in judicial nominations began.
119 posted on
09/22/2004 7:28:56 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(I made enough money to buy Miami -- but I pissed it away on the Alternative Minimum Tax.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson