Posted on 09/21/2004 9:15:07 PM PDT by rwilson99
Edited on 09/21/2004 9:21:16 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
This is getting better and better.
This to eliminate the possibility of any new evidence surfacing before the election. The Kerry Campaign and probably the DNC has been hard at work these past two weeks. Deny. Delay. Diffuse. Debauch. This could have always been the fall-back position (insofar as the KC.DNC are concerned), let CBS/Blather twist in the wind.
MALICE AFORETHOUGHT,
KILL WITH - To kill either deliberately and intentionally or recklessly with extreme disregard for human life.
If he had doubts why did he take them to anybody? And if he didn't make them up, WHO did? And where did HE get them and who from?
Someone isn't telling the truth (again).
Did you hear the part about the originals and the envelop they came in were burned right after copies were made. Brit Hume had something on this on his show tonight.
Yea, right. How stupid do they think people are? I guess pretty stupid if they tried to pass off those docs as authentic.
And what is really funny, there are still people on DU that say the memos are not fake.
Oh, it's a crime, alright, but this isn't about libel against Bush. This was a conspiracy between CBS, the Kerry campaign, and the DNC to subvert a U.S. Presidential election through fraud, in a time of war.
Maybe John Edwards will take his case, cuz he should be available the 2nd week of November.
malice
n. a conscious, intentional wrongdoing either of a civil wrong like libel (false written statement about another) or a criminal act like assault or murder, with the intention of doing harm to the victim. This intention includes ill-will, hatred or total disregard for the other's well-being. Often the mean nature of the act itself implies malice, without the party saying "I did it because I was mad at him, and I hated him," which would be express malice. Malice is an element in first degree murder. In a lawsuit for defamation (libel and slander) the existence of malice may increase the judgment to include general damages. Proof of malice is absolutely necessary for a "public figure" to win a lawsuit for defamation.
defamation
n. the act of making untrue statements about another which damages his/her reputation. If the defamatory statement is printed or broadcast over the media it is libel and, if only oral, it is slander. Public figures, including officeholders and candidates, have to show that the defamation was made with malicious intent and was not just fair comment
public figure
n. in the law of defamation (libel and slander), a personage of great public interest or familiarity like a government official, politician, celebrity, business leader, movie star or sports hero. Incorrect harmful statements published about a public figure cannot be the basis of a lawsuit for defamation unless there is proof that the writer or publisher intentionally defamed the person with malice (hate).
I COULDN'T HAVE DONE IT BETTER!
THANKS!
I JUST WENT FOR THE QUICK DEFINITION.
I don't know much about the people who run the sight, but I do know that somone from the sight, the owner or wife of or something, got into a huge screaming match with Michael Moore and started calling him a liar (in person, and face to face).
It was in referance to the movie F911.
I REMEMBER THE NAME OF MOVIE, BUT NOT THE DETAILS.
RATHER DID THIS INTENIONALLY KNOWINGLY THAT THIS COULD STIR UP THE BOAT AND MAKE A LOT OF NOICE.
CBS NEWS, IS NOT A NEWS OUTLET ANYMORE, ITS A 527.
RATHER MAY WANT TO TWIST THIS A 1000 TIMES BUT THE EFEECT IS THE SAME.
I SHALL BRING THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF JUDICIAL WATCH!
Do we have proof that Edwards isn't doing a little side job here? Come on, I want to hear Edwards deny that he is an attorney in this matter.
Like watching a train wreck, you just can't look away...
"Viet" cong - (typing in the dark in my bathrobe - it's late) : )
Won't a criminal investigation trump a civil matter? It seems to me that any "nondisclosure agreement" would not apply if the DA starts asking questions. Rather than bottling up the truth of this matter, Burkett's action will galvanize an investigation, expediting the collapse of the coverup.
BTW--Been reading the site for a several days (yes, Rathergate is responsible). Just want to say that I deeply appreciate everyone's labors on behalf of a Better World.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.