The Weasel Lehane
Posted on 09/20/2004 9:34:42 AM PDT by SmithPatterson
CBS Regrets Bush Memos Story
NEW YORK, Sept. 20, 2004
(CBS/AP) CBS News on Monday said it regretted broadcasting a story about President Bush's military service based on documents whose authenticity is in doubt, saying the source of the material had misled the network.
CBS News Anchor Dan Rather, the reporter of the original story, apologized.
In a statement, CBS said former Texas Guard official Bill Burkett "has acknowledged that he provided the now-disputed documents" and "admits that he deliberately misled the CBS News producer working on the report, giving her a false account of the documents' origins to protect a promise of confidentiality to the actual source."
The network did not say the memoranda — purportedly written by one of Mr. Bush's National Guard commanders — were forgeries. But the network did say it could not authenticate the documents and that it should not have reported them.
"Based on what we now know, CBS News cannot prove that the documents are authentic, which is the only acceptable journalistic standard to justify using them in the report," said the statement by CBS News President Andrew Heyward. "We should not have used them. That was a mistake, which we deeply regret."
"Nothing is more important to us than our credibility and keeping faith with the millions of people who count on us for fair, accurate, reliable, and independent reporting," Heyward continued. "We will continue to work tirelessly to be worthy of that trust."
Additional reporting on the documents will air on Monday's CBS Evening News, including the interview of Burkett by Rather. CBS News pledged "an independent review of the process by which the report was prepared and broadcast to help determine what actions need to be taken."
In a separate statement, Rather said that "after extensive additional interviews, I no longer have the confidence in these documents that would allow us to continue vouching for them journalistically."
"I find we have been misled on the key question of how our source for the documents came into possession of these papers," he said.
"We made a mistake in judgment, and for that I am sorry," Rather added.
The authenticity of the documents — four memoranda attributed to Guard commander Lt. Col. Jerry Killian — has been under fire since they were described in a Sept. 8 broadcast of 60 Minutes.
CBS had not previously revealed who provided the documents or how they were obtained.
Burkett has previously alleged that in 1997 he witnessed allies of then-Gov. Bush discussing the destruction of Guard files that might embarrass Mr. Bush, who was considering a run for the presidency. Bush aides have denied the charge.
In the statement, CBS said: "Burkett originally said he obtained the documents from another former Guardsman. Now he says he got them from a different source whose connection to the documents and identity CBS News has been unable to verify to this point."
Questions about the president's National Guard service have lingered for years. Some critics question how Mr. Bush got into the Guard when there were waiting lists of young men hoping to join it to escape the draft and possible service in Vietnam.
In the Sept. 8 60 Minutes report, former Texas Lt. Gov. Ben Barnes — a Democrat — claimed that, at the behest of a friend of the Bush family, he pulled strings to get young George W. Bush into the Guard.
Other questions concern why Mr. Bush missed a physical in 1972, and why there are scant records of any service by Mr. Bush during the latter part of 1972, a period during which he transferred to an Alabama guard unit so he could work on a campaign there.
The CBS documents suggested that Mr. Bush had disobeyed a direct order to attend the physical, and that there were other lapses in his performance. One memo also indicated that powerful allies of the Bush family were pressuring the guard to "sugar coat" any investigation of Lt. Bush's service.
Skeptics immediately seized on the typing in the memos, which included a superscripted "th" not found on all 1970s-era typewriters. As the controversy raged, CBS broadcast interviews with experts who said that some typewriters from that period could have produced the markings in question.
Other critics saw factual errors in the documents, stylistic differences with other writing by Killian and incorrect military lingo.
Some relatives of Col. Killian disputed that the memos were real. His former secretary said the sentiments regarding Mr. Bush's failures as an officer were genuine, but the documents were not.
Some document experts whom CBS consulted for the story told newspapers they had raised doubts before the broadcast and were ignored. CBS disputed their accounts, pointing to the main document expert the network consulted, Marcel Matley.
Matley insisted he had vouched for the authenticity of the signatures on the memos, but had not determined whether the documents themselves were genuine.
Last week, CBS News stood by its reporting while vowing to continue working the story. The network acknowledged there were questions about the documents and pledged to try to answer them.
Mr. Bush maintains that he did not get special treatment in getting into the Guard, and that he fulfilled all duties. He was honorably discharged.
On Saturday, a White House official said Mr. Bush has reviewed the disputed documents that purport to show he refused orders to take a physical examination in 1972, and did not recall having seen them previously.
In his first public comment on the documents controversy, the president told The Union Leader of Manchester, N.H., "There are a lot of questions about the documents, and they need to be answered."
The Bush campaign has alleged that their Democratic rivals were somehow involved in the story. John Kerry's campaign denies it. In an email revealed last week, Burkett said he had contacted the Kerry campaign but received no response.
Meanwhile, a federal judge has ordered the Pentagon to find and make public by next week any unreleased files about Mr. Bush's Vietnam-era Air National Guard service to resolve a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the Associated Press.
The White House and Defense Department have on several occasions claimed that they had released all the documents only to make additional records available later on.
©MMIV, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
This is another trial balloon. They're trying to avoid dismissals and recriminations by 'regretting' what happened, hoping this will go away.
Rather the opposite is needed now: what are the connections among Burkette, Van Os, Cleland, Rather, Mapes, Kerry, etc?
Acknowledging their fake is not enough.
If nothing else this really blunts any October surprise from the Dems using the National Guard.
Still open for expectation of October Suprise:
cocaine co-user or paid abortion.
This is just another excuse for CBS to interview Burkett so he can bash Bush without a counterpoint.
The cartoon's cool, but I like your tag line better.
"CBS Regrets Bush Memos Story"
Shouldn't that read "CBS Regrets Getting Caught Pushing Bogus Bush Memos Story"
The Weasel Lehane
Dan must resign!
That would make Buckhead the courageous little Frodo: He's dropped the Ring into the fires of Mount Doom, all hail the hero!
The legendary Liberal backhanded slap..."Sure, they're fake, but only because we were nobly protecting our souce from the Evil Republicans!"
I think, IMHO, the coming Bush Doc-u-dump demanded by the Liberal Judge is going to make this entire AWOL-from-the-Guard thing a moot point, so once it was ordered, Danny Boy had to find the least painful way out of the problem.
Suppose CBS will also find Nicole's killer?
Well, we can look at it this way, if there is a genuine October Surprise, old Dan will have to buy a newspaper to read about it.
"What's with the, "We will continue to work tirelessly to be worthy of that trust."? They lost what little trust they had. The statement should be "We will use our best efforts to restore your trust."
Cleland, obviously.
Cleland will be the perfect culprit from a public relations stand for the DNC. He'll get no jail time due to his condition.
Dan, if you truly regret it, then don't apologize to us, apologize to President Bush. Until then, talk is cheap.
Time for Danny Boy to pick up a shovel and start preparing a permanant resting place along with CBS.
But the doubt's been raised. Only jaundiced "eyes" from now on.
I'm sorry, but this is unbelievable. CBS claimed that the sourcing for the documents gave them credence in the documents' authenticity, but now they are saying all they knew was that a "Guardsman" gave it to Burkett, a partisan Democrat. There has to be more here than meets the eye. Are we supposed to believe that CBS did not get the name of the Guardsman, and just took Burkett's word for it? Was that the overwhelming evidence for CBS's claim?
If this doesn't prove that CBS was WILLINGLY deceived about the documents, I don't know what would. Until now they have hidden the fact that a known partisan was their source, and that they treated him as if he had no axe to grind. What a crock!
They don't understand that the American people can smell a snake and are only willing to give a fair shake to someone for an honest mistake, to someone who is sincerely repentent and wants to make restitution for a mistake.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.