Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS Regrets Bush Memos Story
CBSNews.com ^ | 9-20-04 | Unknown

Posted on 09/20/2004 9:34:42 AM PDT by SmithPatterson

CBS Regrets Bush Memos Story

NEW YORK, Sept. 20, 2004

(CBS/AP) CBS News on Monday said it regretted broadcasting a story about President Bush's military service based on documents whose authenticity is in doubt, saying the source of the material had misled the network.

CBS News Anchor Dan Rather, the reporter of the original story, apologized.

In a statement, CBS said former Texas Guard official Bill Burkett "has acknowledged that he provided the now-disputed documents" and "admits that he deliberately misled the CBS News producer working on the report, giving her a false account of the documents' origins to protect a promise of confidentiality to the actual source."

The network did not say the memoranda — purportedly written by one of Mr. Bush's National Guard commanders — were forgeries. But the network did say it could not authenticate the documents and that it should not have reported them.

"Based on what we now know, CBS News cannot prove that the documents are authentic, which is the only acceptable journalistic standard to justify using them in the report," said the statement by CBS News President Andrew Heyward. "We should not have used them. That was a mistake, which we deeply regret."

"Nothing is more important to us than our credibility and keeping faith with the millions of people who count on us for fair, accurate, reliable, and independent reporting," Heyward continued. "We will continue to work tirelessly to be worthy of that trust."

Additional reporting on the documents will air on Monday's CBS Evening News, including the interview of Burkett by Rather. CBS News pledged "an independent review of the process by which the report was prepared and broadcast to help determine what actions need to be taken."

In a separate statement, Rather said that "after extensive additional interviews, I no longer have the confidence in these documents that would allow us to continue vouching for them journalistically."

"I find we have been misled on the key question of how our source for the documents came into possession of these papers," he said.

"We made a mistake in judgment, and for that I am sorry," Rather added.

The authenticity of the documents — four memoranda attributed to Guard commander Lt. Col. Jerry Killian — has been under fire since they were described in a Sept. 8 broadcast of 60 Minutes.

CBS had not previously revealed who provided the documents or how they were obtained.

Burkett has previously alleged that in 1997 he witnessed allies of then-Gov. Bush discussing the destruction of Guard files that might embarrass Mr. Bush, who was considering a run for the presidency. Bush aides have denied the charge.

In the statement, CBS said: "Burkett originally said he obtained the documents from another former Guardsman. Now he says he got them from a different source whose connection to the documents and identity CBS News has been unable to verify to this point."

Questions about the president's National Guard service have lingered for years. Some critics question how Mr. Bush got into the Guard when there were waiting lists of young men hoping to join it to escape the draft and possible service in Vietnam.

In the Sept. 8 60 Minutes report, former Texas Lt. Gov. Ben Barnes — a Democrat — claimed that, at the behest of a friend of the Bush family, he pulled strings to get young George W. Bush into the Guard.

Other questions concern why Mr. Bush missed a physical in 1972, and why there are scant records of any service by Mr. Bush during the latter part of 1972, a period during which he transferred to an Alabama guard unit so he could work on a campaign there.

The CBS documents suggested that Mr. Bush had disobeyed a direct order to attend the physical, and that there were other lapses in his performance. One memo also indicated that powerful allies of the Bush family were pressuring the guard to "sugar coat" any investigation of Lt. Bush's service.

Skeptics immediately seized on the typing in the memos, which included a superscripted "th" not found on all 1970s-era typewriters. As the controversy raged, CBS broadcast interviews with experts who said that some typewriters from that period could have produced the markings in question.

Other critics saw factual errors in the documents, stylistic differences with other writing by Killian and incorrect military lingo.

Some relatives of Col. Killian disputed that the memos were real. His former secretary said the sentiments regarding Mr. Bush's failures as an officer were genuine, but the documents were not.

Some document experts whom CBS consulted for the story told newspapers they had raised doubts before the broadcast and were ignored. CBS disputed their accounts, pointing to the main document expert the network consulted, Marcel Matley.

Matley insisted he had vouched for the authenticity of the signatures on the memos, but had not determined whether the documents themselves were genuine.

Last week, CBS News stood by its reporting while vowing to continue working the story. The network acknowledged there were questions about the documents and pledged to try to answer them.

Mr. Bush maintains that he did not get special treatment in getting into the Guard, and that he fulfilled all duties. He was honorably discharged.

On Saturday, a White House official said Mr. Bush has reviewed the disputed documents that purport to show he refused orders to take a physical examination in 1972, and did not recall having seen them previously.

In his first public comment on the documents controversy, the president told The Union Leader of Manchester, N.H., "There are a lot of questions about the documents, and they need to be answered."

The Bush campaign has alleged that their Democratic rivals were somehow involved in the story. John Kerry's campaign denies it. In an email revealed last week, Burkett said he had contacted the Kerry campaign but received no response.

Meanwhile, a federal judge has ordered the Pentagon to find and make public by next week any unreleased files about Mr. Bush's Vietnam-era Air National Guard service to resolve a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the Associated Press.

The White House and Defense Department have on several occasions claimed that they had released all the documents only to make additional records available later on.

©MMIV, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cbs; cbsnews; forgery; killian; rather; rathergate; stainedbluememo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-252 next last
To: mabelkitty
Carl Cameron was just on Fox saying Maxie confirmed there was contact with Burkett. He also said that Kerry was pushing this 60 Minutes piece as a "must see" to his traveling press for several weeks PRIOR to it coming out. Carl Cameron, as we all know, is one of them traveling with Kerry.

*BUMP* This is important information.

121 posted on 09/20/2004 10:02:55 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson

Notice they are blowing off the lies told by Ben Barnes.
The memos aren't the only lies in this hit piece, and 60 Minutes isn't over until is ovah!

Burkett needs to be squeezed - he is not the "unimpeachable source".


122 posted on 09/20/2004 10:04:09 AM PDT by mabelkitty (Watch for a CBS employee in a trench coat going by DeepWord.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

Well, he didn't even say "I'm sorry" to the President.


123 posted on 09/20/2004 10:04:17 AM PDT by SirAllen (Liberalism*2 = Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson
I just peeked in over at DU (been doing that a lot lately, they're hillarious!) and caught their reaction to CBS's chomping down a hefty helping of crow, and they are screaming for Burkett to REVEAL HIS SOURCE! In their delusional world, the culprit is Karl Rove, who they think provided the forgeries to Dan Rather.

Well, at least we all seem to agree on one thing here... we're ALL waiting to get to the bottom of this smelly mess.

124 posted on 09/20/2004 10:04:29 AM PDT by Kenton ("Life is tough, and it's really tough when you're stupid" - Damon Runyon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HoustonTech
In the statement, CBS said: "Burkett originally said he obtained the documents from another former Guardsman. Now he says he got them from a different source whose connection to the documents and identity CBS News has been unable to verify to this point."

Complete BS. Rather said the source was "unimpeachable". So was he referring to Burkett--a self-acknowledged liar, dim partisan hack, paranoid refuge from the looney bin? Or was he referring to the unknown "former guardsman" as his "unimpeachable source"?

In any event why is the new "unnamed source" any less "unimpeachable" than the unknown former guardsman or nut-case Burkett?

Even though cBS continues, apparently, to stand by what is in the forgeries and does not, in fact, admit them to be forgeries, I'm sure the rest of the lame stream media will give a little tsk-tsk and talk about the people at CBS as "victims". This is not enough--the contacts between cBS and the DNC must be revealed. This was an INTENTIONAL fraud, start to finish-- and it ain't finished as far as I am concerned.

125 posted on 09/20/2004 10:04:36 AM PDT by San Jacinto ("This is Dan Rather---'forging' ahead'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: afnamvet
No apology to President Bush from Rather. No peace for SeeeeBS!!!!!

I noticed that too. That is exactly as I had expected before reading it.


126 posted on 09/20/2004 10:04:45 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

"This used to be called treason, now it is called forgery."

Rather is trying to "Sugar Coat" his complicity.


127 posted on 09/20/2004 10:04:46 AM PDT by Socratic (Kerry/Edwards - Forging a New Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Where and with whom did the documents originate? Inquiring minds want to know - - but apparently CBS News isn't interested. (so much for its journalistic instincts)


128 posted on 09/20/2004 10:05:14 AM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson
See BS should call in this team to investigat itself.


129 posted on 09/20/2004 10:05:55 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
They violated Texas law by forging a Government document. That is a felony.

Rather is an accomplice and Burkett is guilty as sin.

Come on TEXAS RANGERS...time to do your job!!!

130 posted on 09/20/2004 10:06:23 AM PDT by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe produces yet another forged document, this time alleging the Tooth Fairy Karl Rove and other partisans are behind the vicious attacks on Dan Rather's credibility.

131 posted on 09/20/2004 10:06:54 AM PDT by NewMediaFan (Fake but accurate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: MEG33

Well CBS uses her in their statement and no one is questioning it!So again they lie and get away with it


132 posted on 09/20/2004 10:07:08 AM PDT by patriciamary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Kenton
In their delusional world, the culprit is Karl Rove, who they think provided the forgeries to Dan Rather.

I'm sure CBS is hoping to find something, anything, that kinda sorta vaguely points in that direction.

133 posted on 09/20/2004 10:07:32 AM PDT by steve-b (I put sentences together suspiciously well for a righty blogger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"Now, after extensive additional interviews, I no longer have the confidence in these documents that would allow us to continue vouching for them journalistically. I find we have been misled on the key question of how our source for the documents came into possession of these papers. That, combined with some of the questions that have been raised in public and in the press, leads me to a point where—

if I knew then what I know now

—I would not have gone ahead with the story as it was aired, and I certainly would not have used the documents in question."

He may as well of said, if I had done my homework, done these interviews in the first place, perhaps I would have had a clue! And .. funny it took the right wing pj clad wacko's to figure it all out. No way is Burkett the only source, its gotta be Barnes and/or Cleland. I hope some real energetic journalist out there gets to the bottom of this. I still can't believe they could have been duped by Burkett alone. He is simply taking he heat off the main source. Its the only reason I can imagine they would drag out the interview with him. This interview is such that it purportedly shows his lack of credibility.

134 posted on 09/20/2004 10:07:50 AM PDT by Sea2ShiningSea (God shed His grace on thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
What really cracks me up....CBS's Andrew Heyward in his statement says, "we can't authenticate the documents". He should have said, "we now know the documents are not authentic, they are fakes."

And by the way.....CBS should apologize to FOXNews as well as their viewers, the family of LTC Killian, and President Bush.

135 posted on 09/20/2004 10:07:54 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@The Mainstream Media Took A Fatal Blow....From CBS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HoustonTech
In a statement, CBS said former Texas Guard official Bill Burkett "has acknowledged that he provided the now-disputed documents" and "admits that he deliberately misled the CBS News producer working on the report, giving her a false account of the documents' origins to protect a promise of confidentiality to the actual source."

What in the heck does this mean, translated into English? What "false account" did Burkett give? What is the TRUE origin of the documents? Who is their source? Because they're phony, CBS shouldn't have any legitimate claims of confidentiality to protect.

136 posted on 09/20/2004 10:07:55 AM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Absolutely they are forgeries. It's a matter of just finding out who did the dirty work.

Burkett lied to See BS regarding who gave them to him. I wonder if he lied to them again about the source of the documents? I wouldn't be at all surprised.


137 posted on 09/20/2004 10:08:35 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

Mark for later - what a day to have to work!!!


138 posted on 09/20/2004 10:08:37 AM PDT by NCjim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
The Weasel Lehane

There are so many canidates of who the source is .. but one this in for sure imo .. it goes to the DNC/Kerry Camp

139 posted on 09/20/2004 10:08:54 AM PDT by Mo1 (Why is the MSM calling the Vietnam Vets and POW's a suspected group??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: SmithPatterson
Let's see now it took five years to figure out that Burkett misled them, I think not, pressure from those "lowly" bloggers helped.
140 posted on 09/20/2004 10:09:01 AM PDT by keysguy (Trust the media as far as you can throw them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-252 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson