Posted on 09/20/2004 8:54:24 AM PDT by TheGeezer
Edited on 09/20/2004 9:07:32 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Have they specified the time or is it another delay, delay, delay such as last time when they finally made an utterly stupid statement -- and whoever wrote it should be fired for their low IQ.
I'm not holding my breath. I would be really shocked if they said anything even remotely near the truth any time soon.
The question, Dan, is why didn't you know then what you know now?!!
whatever it is, best we not gloat.
Fact is, there are a LOT of VERY serious issues that should be pushed HARD OTHER than the documets. The other issues expose HOW THE MEDIA WING OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY ACTUALLY WORKS! CBS' "gold standard" included:
1. The widow and son were IGNORED
2. Document experts were IGNORED
3. Hodges was MISLED
4. The old secretary was NOT INTERVIEWED until afterward
5. Staudt, who had his character attacked in one memo, was never contacted
6. The opinions of the experts were MISREPRESENTED
7. The swift boat veterans were MALIGNED
8. George Bush's roomate DURING HIS GUARD YEARS, who AGREED TO SPEAK TO THEM WAS TURNED DOWN BECAUSE HE WAS TOO "PRO BUSH"...
And the list goes on. Fact is, this was a HIT PIECE ON BUSH. And just because dnCBS owns up to fake documents does NOT CLEAR THEIR PROPAGANDA / DNC REPORTING!!
So CBS allows the perp to be interviewed by the (willing?) patsy? Oh, good one...
Why didn't he just come out and say, "hit me here"?
Last week they kept putting it off all day to attract attention.
Cbs has become an exhibitionist network, trying to get more viewers by flashing.
EXCLUSIVE
STATEMENT FROM DAN RATHER:
Last week, amid increasing questions about the authenticity of documents used in support of a 60 MINUTES WEDNESDAY story about President Bush's time in the Texas Air National Guard, CBS News vowed to re-examine the documents in question—and their source—vigorously. And we promised that we would let the American public know what this examination turned up, whatever the outcome.
Now, after extensive additional interviews, I no longer have the confidence in these documents that would allow us to continue vouching for them journalistically. I find we have been misled on the key question of how our source for the documents came into possession of these papers. That, combined with some of the questions that have been raised in public and in the press, leads me to a point where—if I knew then what I know now—I would not have gone ahead with the story as it was aired, and I certainly would not have used the documents in question.
But we did use the documents. We made a mistake in judgment, and for that I am sorry. It was an error that was made, however, in good faith and in the spirit of trying to carry on a CBS News tradition of investigative reporting without fear or favoritism.
Please know that nothing is more important to us than people's trust in our ability and our commitment to report fairly and truthfully.
Who was the source?
I just made a trip over to DU (yeah, I need a shower) and it says it's down for maintenance. How much ya wanna bet they don't want us to see them drinking the Kool-Aid.
And who ever had "mistakes were made" wins the office pool as having the response most closely matching Dan's.
sorry
So that's it. Move on, folks-- nothing else to see here. The End. How 'bout them Yankees?
In other words - "OOOPSIE! We were 'mislead'. Sorry about that! Nothing more to see here, let's just move on!
BS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.