Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheGeezer

EXCLUSIVE

STATEMENT FROM DAN RATHER:

Last week, amid increasing questions about the authenticity of documents used in support of a 60 MINUTES WEDNESDAY story about President Bush's time in the Texas Air National Guard, CBS News vowed to re-examine the documents in question—and their source—vigorously. And we promised that we would let the American public know what this examination turned up, whatever the outcome.

Now, after extensive additional interviews, I no longer have the confidence in these documents that would allow us to continue vouching for them journalistically. I find we have been misled on the key question of how our source for the documents came into possession of these papers. That, combined with some of the questions that have been raised in public and in the press, leads me to a point where—if I knew then what I know now—I would not have gone ahead with the story as it was aired, and I certainly would not have used the documents in question.

But we did use the documents. We made a mistake in judgment, and for that I am sorry. It was an error that was made, however, in good faith and in the spirit of trying to carry on a CBS News tradition of investigative reporting without fear or favoritism.

Please know that nothing is more important to us than people's trust in our ability and our commitment to report fairly and truthfully.


50 posted on 09/20/2004 9:07:06 AM PDT by hispanarepublicana (Miss Free Republic High School-1986)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hispanarepublicana
Note to CBS: DUH.

Now is Rather going to make a retraction on both the programs this cr@p aired on?

74 posted on 09/20/2004 9:08:56 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: hispanarepublicana

He STILL doesn't say they're bogus!!!


75 posted on 09/20/2004 9:09:00 AM PDT by The G Man (I'm mad as ZELL and I'm not gonna take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: hispanarepublicana

Ah shucks, it was an oversight.


79 posted on 09/20/2004 9:09:11 AM PDT by balk (Martin's goin' down (just you wait!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: hispanarepublicana
"I find we have been misled..."

Hey! So do I!

But I was misled by an arm of the main stream media.

Guess we both should have known better.

80 posted on 09/20/2004 9:09:13 AM PDT by Chasaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: hispanarepublicana

What a phony!!!


101 posted on 09/20/2004 9:11:16 AM PDT by Dengar01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: hispanarepublicana

WHERE is the apology to President Bush??


109 posted on 09/20/2004 9:12:02 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: hispanarepublicana



"Therefore.... I shall resign the anchorship effective at noon tomorrow. Vice-Anchor Williams will be sworn in as anchor at that hour in this studio."


(Oh, wait.... he didn't say that? Damn.)

-Dan
115 posted on 09/20/2004 9:12:34 AM PDT by Flux Capacitor (Strange Things Are Afoot at the Circle K.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: hispanarepublicana
and in the spirit of trying to carry on a CBS News tradition of investigative reporting without fear or favoritism.

What the heck does that mean???

121 posted on 09/20/2004 9:13:24 AM PDT by Howlin (What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: hispanarepublicana

Okay, so don't give us this crap. If the memos are forged (which is now stipulated), then there is no reason to protect the source. Whoever gave these memos to CBS is running naked now and must be outed.

Let the feeding frenzy begin. We'll see to whom the trail leads.

If CBS continues to protect this source, then they are overtly engaging in a conspiracy (as opposed to the covert smear job they had hoped to do).


134 posted on 09/20/2004 9:14:52 AM PDT by OhMike (He which hath no stomach to this fight, let him depart...we would not die in that man's company.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: hispanarepublicana
if I knew then what I know now—I would not have gone ahead with the story as it was aired, and I certainly would not have used the documents in question.

Translation: We were told by numerous experts that the documents were probably forgeries. If we had know we were going to be caught, we wouldn't have used them.

170 posted on 09/20/2004 9:17:49 AM PDT by I'm ALL Right! ("When the going gets weird, anchor men punt." - Dan Rather, election 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

CBS News executives (shown above) return to the Commissary for a hearty lunch of funnel cakes after making Dan Rather come to his senses. Insiders report that Mr. Rather was repeatedly subjected to dousings of buckets-full of ice-cold confetti until he signed the statement.

250 posted on 09/20/2004 9:27:46 AM PDT by P H Lewis ("I wish somebody would tell me what diddy-wah-diddy means." - Blind Arthur Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: hispanarepublicana
But we did use the documents. We made a mistake in judgment, and for that I am sorry. It was an error that was made, however, in good faith and in the spirit of trying to carry on a CBS News tradition of investigative reporting without fear or favoritism.

Whenever you put a caveat to your "apology", you aren't apologizing, you're justifying.

558 posted on 09/20/2004 10:42:50 AM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson