Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proof the 2nd Purple Heart was a hoax
Swift Boat Veterans for Truth (forum) ^ | 2004-09-19 | SBVFT / NavyChief

Posted on 09/19/2004 2:29:15 PM PDT by Boundless

These tiny injuries are not consistent with B-40
rocket shrapnel. THEY ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE
EFFECTS FROM M-79 GRENADE LAUNCHERS.

...
He probably then grabbed the M-79 grenade launcher --
shooting a round into a reportedly monsoon rain. The
round would have detonated prematurely due to the wall
of rain that was coming down and thus blown back to
wound Thorson and Kerry, as well as Fred Short it appears.

(Excerpt) Read more at 2.swiftvets.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1969; 20feb; b40; heart; hoax; john; kerry; kerrylies; m79; militaryrecord; napalminthemorning; pcf; purple; purpleheart; sbv; vietnam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Unfit for Command did not strongly dispute
Kerry's second Purple Heart, due to lack of evidence.
Since the book was published, additional material has
become available, and the SBVFT have put together what
now makes a stronger case that this was yet-another
unintentionally(?) self-inflicted wound, involving NO
hostile fire.

It appears that LTJG Kerry was a true menace to
friendly forces with an M-79. The first PH resulted
from firing one at a target too close (shoreline rocks).
The second from firing into heavy rain.

What's the problem with heavy rain? My surmise is
that grenade and rocket launchers generally do not
arm the warhead until some time/distance after the
projectile has cleared the tube. But at that point
the warhead is impact-fused. Presumably, heavy rain
is sufficient to detonate, once armed.

1 posted on 09/19/2004 2:29:16 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Boundless

bttt for later


2 posted on 09/19/2004 2:30:19 PM PDT by boxerblues (www.ohbluestarmothers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

<<
What's the problem with heavy rain? My surmise is
that grenade and rocket launchers generally do not
arm the warhead until some time/distance after the
projectile has cleared the tube. But at that point
the warhead is impact-fused. Presumably, heavy rain
is sufficient to detonate, once armed.
>>
M79 projectiles do need to spin-up to arm. Wouldn't know about the rain.


3 posted on 09/19/2004 2:44:55 PM PDT by MagnumRancid (I need a new screen name - its left over from my Doom/Quake playing days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

My understanding of the 40mm grenades used in the M-79 is that they arm as a result of a spinning action. After firing, the round spins at about 3700rpm and is armed after about 15 meters of flight.


4 posted on 09/19/2004 2:46:57 PM PDT by Defender3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues
Puhleeze... don't you know that O'Reilly, Terry McAuliff, and the other lib talking heads have stated that "The swift boat vets have been discredited!!!!

They've said it's all false... right??? So Kerry really is a hero.... he's just like Bob Dole, Audie Murphy, Hackworth, etc... hell he probably fell on a grenade but it only "nicked" him like his pet monkey, Max Cleland.

5 posted on 09/19/2004 2:49:08 PM PDT by Dick Vomer (liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

It's my understanding that you can still very easily wound yourself in a minor way with an M79, even with the delay fuse. The point of the delay is to prevent you from turning yourself (and squadmates near you) into a tiny pieces, not to make you invincible.


6 posted on 09/19/2004 2:51:19 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

BTTT


7 posted on 09/19/2004 2:52:13 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

Is this the "rice in the buttocks" wound, or was that the third Purple Heart? It's so hard to keep all of his grievous injuries straight.


8 posted on 09/19/2004 2:56:57 PM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer

> Is this the "rice in the buttocks" wound,
> or was that the third Purple Heart?

You are not confused.

#1: M-79 on the rocks.
#2: M-79 in the rain.
#3: Rice-A-Roni

All self-inflicted, but none with obvious intention.

There may still be a question about the exact ordnance
used in PH#3. The PCFs reportedly were issued concussion
grenades, and not fragmentation grenades, presumably to
avoid puncturing the hull in nearby combat encounters.

Did Kerry borrow a frag from some ground troops?
Did he use a conc? Or, since the wound was rice,
does it matter. A conc might be all the explanation
needed.


9 posted on 09/19/2004 3:04:55 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Boundless
It appears that LTJG Kerry was a true menace to friendly forces with an M-79. The first PH resulted from firing one at a target too close (shoreline rocks). The second from firing into heavy rain.

Damn shoreline rocks. You can never tell when they're going to rise up & attack you!

10 posted on 09/19/2004 3:06:32 PM PDT by tsmith130 ("Some folks look at me and see a certain swagger, which in Texas is called "walking."" - GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer

I thought Cleland was a helo pilot in Nam who got it from a combination of heavy enemy fire into his helo and the crash back onto the ground.

It looks like his bitterness over the 2002 elections, combined with his dislike of the Bush campaign, in general, may have sucked him up into the whole "Rathergate" fiasco.


11 posted on 09/19/2004 3:11:39 PM PDT by BigKahuna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BigKahuna
Must be a different Cleland. The one best known in the news thought for years that he'd dropped one of his grenades accidentally.

One thing his situation proves is that a warzone is ultimately a very dangerous place to be. All the guys who went to Nam should be saluted for their bravery.

12 posted on 09/19/2004 3:15:10 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

Kerry was in Nam?


13 posted on 09/19/2004 3:18:49 PM PDT by woofie (This document was generated in 2004 by a computer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

No, you're right. I'm getting my Nam war wounds confused, lately. Fell on a grenade that was accidentally dropped, alright.

I'm a retired military officer with 22 years of service. It's still amazing to me what a hold Vietnam still has over all of us.


14 posted on 09/19/2004 3:21:50 PM PDT by BigKahuna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BigKahuna
>>I thought Cleland was a helo pilot in Nam who got it from a combination of heavy enemy fire into his helo and the crash back onto the ground.

Cleland got out of a helicopter and saw a grenade on the ground. He picked it up and it went off in his hand. There was no hostile fire involved. Sorry I don't have a good definitive link for you, but it would be easily googled.
15 posted on 09/19/2004 3:28:14 PM PDT by MarineBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Defender3

...depends on what kind of round is being fired. Some arm a lot closer than that (three meters or so, IIRC?). ...kill radius is only about 5 meters on most of the anti-personnel types, IIRC.

I doubt that rain would have set it off. We (grenadiers) were not cautioned against firing grenades in rain.

But a rock would do it. And he might have caught a tiny sliver with low energy behind it from a pretty good distance.


16 posted on 09/19/2004 3:30:33 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MarineBrat

If you read his biography from a Georgia citizen's website that I just Googled, it leads one to believe that a grenade, either from his webgear or from someone else's lost its pin and fell to the ground and then he jumped onto the grenade. A little confusing.

We used to go out on patrol and take soda cans stuffed with more cut-up soda pieces and shove a grenade fuse into the can. We'd tie real fine fishing line to the end of the fuse, which would be armed when someone would trip the line.
More of an anti-personnel thing, and not designed to kill, but you can see where the type of grenade he was messing with would really put you in the hurt locker, shrapnel-wise.


17 posted on 09/19/2004 3:40:51 PM PDT by BigKahuna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BigKahuna
Part of it was this business of guys fighting in jungles. One of my uncles did plenty of that in WWII.

Then, too, everybody had a lever to select auto.

I think that one thing raised the public perception of the terror level way above the WWI experience in the trenches, or the WWII specific terror of guys parachuting into German ground fire. Had a cousin killed that way ~ coming down.

In the future it will all be worse and folks will marvel at the bravery of the soldiers, while standing back a bit lest they get too close to so much risky kharma.

18 posted on 09/19/2004 3:49:28 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BigKahuna
I thought Cleland was a helo pilot in Nam who got it from a combination of heavy enemy fire into his helo and the crash back onto the ground.

nope, screwing around after some adult beverages with frag and some buddies, went after "one that got away".... and he went "away over there and over there".

19 posted on 09/19/2004 3:54:02 PM PDT by Dick Vomer (liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Boundless
If, hypothetically, it is ever determined that Kerry wasn't really on the U.S.'s side, would that make Thorson eligible for a Purple Heart for this incident?

[On a more recent note, are the people who were injured when that creep fragged them eligible for Purple Hearts?]

20 posted on 09/19/2004 4:05:01 PM PDT by supercat (If Kerry becomes President, nothing bad will happen for which he won't have an excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson