Skip to comments.
'Where The Right Went Wrong' (Patrick J. Buchanan)- New York Times Book Review
NY Times ^
| September 12, 2004
| Michael Kazin
Posted on 09/18/2004 6:07:04 PM PDT by Former Military Chick
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-237 next last
To: PaleoPal
Yes that is why I skip the bs that guys like Buchanan put out.
To: Joe Hadenuf
To: af_vet_1981
203
posted on
09/18/2004 10:21:13 PM PDT
by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: Joe Hadenuf
I like Buchanan. Is it his flirtation with facism, antisemitic comments, or political alliance with leftists that is likable ?
To: Former Military Chick; rmlew; Yehuda; Clemenza
Buchanan's book is too expensive to buy as toilet paper. I will stick to Scott tissue. I can get it at the supermarket for 99 cents.
205
posted on
09/18/2004 10:36:19 PM PDT
by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat)
Comment #206 Removed by Moderator
To: Former Military Chick
If Buchanan were true to Ronald Reagan, he would never have violated the 11th commandment. Thou shall not criticize thy fellow Republican. However I am grateful for Pat destroying the Reform Party. Pat come home!!
To: Former Military Chick
And ... For those who like to read reviews instead of purchasing the book. I won't miss not reading this book.
208
posted on
09/18/2004 11:06:53 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(George W Bush / Dick Cheney - Right for our Times!)
To: Gumption; Cacique; Former Military Chick; PaleoPal; Willie Green; Paleo Conservative
Read Death of the West and A Republic not an Empire.
Pat sees the threat of the Islamists. He simply does not believe that we can defeat them now. In his praise for Nixon's Vietnam policy and Neville Chamberlain's policy at Munich, we see Pat's ploy. He wants to buy time for the west. He sees a unified Islamist Middle East as inevitable. Thus he supports pulling out.
His policy of ending most US support for Israel while formalizing a security guarantee is similar to the Ford policy in Vietnam. He knows that we will not go to war to save Israel, given that Pat uses this as an epithet to attack the iraq campaign. It is an empty promise. He is willing to watch Israel fall, in the hope that it buys us time and is an impetus to end the demographic threats we face.
209
posted on
09/18/2004 11:11:49 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
To: MegaSilver
"I don't agree with Buchanan on everything."
Well, that's a relief, because PB's ideas on foreign policy and trade are idiotic. Iraq is part of the GWOT, yet Pat's in a pre-9/11 hangup with the Joooz. It's almost as if he'd rather have yassir arafat running israel than a jewish PM.
http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com
210
posted on
09/18/2004 11:12:29 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(George W Bush / Dick Cheney - Right for our Times!)
To: MegaSilver
Take a deep breath. Many of us attack Sharon all the time. Stop reading LF and look at posts.
211
posted on
09/18/2004 11:14:07 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
To: Iscool
Go find Pat's article Cui Bueno from TAC and tell me that he is not an anti-Semite.
212
posted on
09/18/2004 11:15:38 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
To: af_vet_1981
Buchanan's idea of fortress America is a freaking joke. Pat isn't qualified to lead a group of boyscouts let alone run the USA.
To: John Lenin
LOL!
One thing I have to give buchanan credit on. He's united all conservatives on at least one point...he's a pathetic joke.
To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
You do realise taht Pat does not want us to have more divisions. He believes in fortress America.
215
posted on
09/18/2004 11:27:32 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
To: Grey Ghost II
Not likely, since we now have a naval attache in Israel to prevent mistakes like that.
216
posted on
09/18/2004 11:28:29 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
To: PaleoPal
Anyone who is against the war is an anti-semite. Anyone who opposes the Trotskyite neocons is an anti-semite.
Which neocon is a Trotskyite?
217
posted on
09/18/2004 11:30:13 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
To: PaleoPal
PAt had nothing toi do with saving Demjanjuk's life. Israel tries war criminals. The Russians turned over documents showing that Demjanjuk was a guard at another camp. Thus, Demjanjuk was proven innocent.
Demjanjuk should be stripped of citizenship and tried for the crimes he did commit.
218
posted on
09/18/2004 11:41:32 PM PDT
by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
To: spodefly; Tax-chick
I think Pat is cute! There was a time back in 1992 that I thought Barbara Boxer was hot. The I got sober...
219
posted on
09/19/2004 12:06:02 AM PDT
by
Clemenza
(I LOVE Halliburton, SUVs and Assault Weapons. Any Questions?)
To: Clemenza
There was a time back in 1992 that I thought Barbara Boxer was hot. The I got sober...
You've spent far too much time on LawnGuyland.
Enjoy the babes in the Pacific Northwest.
220
posted on
09/19/2004 12:29:05 AM PDT
by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-237 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson