Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/18/2004 4:56:32 PM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SJackson; Yehuda; Nachum; Paved Paradise; Thinkin' Gal; Bobby777; adam_az; Alouette; IFly4Him; ...
"India has historically been unwavering in its support for the Palestinian cause. We remain convinced that the Palestinian people will succeed in realizing their national aspirations. It is our view that restrictions on the freedom of movement of President Arafat would not help the cause of peace," an excerpt of minister Ahamed's statement read.
2 posted on 09/18/2004 4:57:06 PM PDT by yonif ("So perish all Thine enemies, O the Lord" - Judges 5:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif

Oh really, hummmm. Guess that means we have to start being weary of Indian names too.


3 posted on 09/18/2004 5:02:54 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif

Arafat is immaterial, too old, too senile, to affect
the direction Palestine will go. He will be dead within
2 to 3 years after which there will be a peace accord
signed between Israel and the Palestinian state.


4 posted on 09/18/2004 5:03:09 PM PDT by gwbiny2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif

new indian govt-leaning back to the old ways==arab ass kissers non aligned etc ..not the allies of the US and Israel vs the Paks...wait till they need help..


5 posted on 09/18/2004 5:06:52 PM PDT by rang1995
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif

As soon as India stops going after the terroist leaders in Kashmir.


6 posted on 09/18/2004 5:08:24 PM PDT by aynrandfreak (If 9/11 didn't change you, you're a bad human being)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
Any effort contemplated to remove him from the scene would be indefensible in international law, would serve no constructive purpose, would negate all efforts towards reconciliation and would prove to be politically counterproductive, apart from having a definite negative impact on the Middle East peace process," the statement explained.

The only known efforts towards reconciliation by Arafat are acts of terrorism. India had best beware of supporting terrorism.

7 posted on 09/18/2004 5:10:43 PM PDT by hflynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif

Worry about cleaning up your own country for Gods sake you have a Billion or who knows how many people living in trash and squalor PLUS are also the worlds biggest polluter along with China ..BTW the hell hole of Calcutta was coined there right??


9 posted on 09/18/2004 5:49:54 PM PDT by Fast1 (Kerry for an Islamic America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
OK, so whether Kashmir terrorists blow up the Indian parliament, we should just consider it "live by the sword, die by the sword" and ignore it. Right?
12 posted on 09/18/2004 9:24:49 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif; All

The Minister in question is a leader of a small party which is in the ruling coalition & which is primarily a Muslim party-so he is playing to the gallery nothing else.The current Indian govt cannot & will not reverse ties with Israel-the relationship is too well entrenched for that to happen-they already sell billions worth in weaponry
& are also expanding business links &Israelis are real used to criticism,don't tell me that Bush only uses words of support for them.About India supporting the Palis-well it did so becaue it had poor leverage with the Persian gulf states who were pro Pakistan.


13 posted on 09/18/2004 9:46:28 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson