See BS is just plain pathetic. Did you seek Staudt out when you investigated your story in the first place you Clymers?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
2 posted on
09/17/2004 11:44:48 PM PDT by
mrustow
("And when Moses saw the golden calf, he shouted out to the heavens, 'Jesus, Mary, and Joseph!'")
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
3 posted on
09/17/2004 11:44:55 PM PDT by
Jenya
(Buy Unfit for Command. Donate to Swiftvets.com. It's your American duty.)
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
4 posted on
09/17/2004 11:45:45 PM PDT by
Jenya
(Buy Unfit for Command. Donate to Swiftvets.com. It's your American duty.)
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
CBS spokeswoman Sandy Genelius brushed off Staudt's statements: "In a debate this heated, one can hardly expect Gen. Staudt to endorse the point of view that he exerted undue influence." In a debate this heated, I guess one can hardly expect CBS or Dan Rather to endorse the point of view that they've used forged documents in an attempt to harm a sitting President of the United States during wartime.
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
The CBS position: Everyone who disputes these documents is obviously biased. But when a little old lady who said bush was "selected, not elected" claims they reflect a dead man's sentiments, then, well, that's news!!!
6 posted on
09/17/2004 11:50:34 PM PDT by
flashbunny
(RINO's pleading for unity means they want to sabotage the republican party in peace.)
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
but they will take the word of a 86 year old woman who plainly states that she does not like President Bush... amazing...
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
This is just getting around-the-bend surreal.
See? BS!
8 posted on
09/17/2004 11:53:59 PM PDT by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
Did you seek Staudt out when you investigated your story in the first place you Clymers?Exactly. One short meeting with him would have killed the story...
10 posted on
09/17/2004 11:54:55 PM PDT by
JPJones
("We'll cross all our tee's and dot all our.....lower case j's")
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
Mr. or Ms. Sandy Genelius, whatever you are, just STFU and try to stop being a disgrace to news reportage for a change.
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
"In a debate this heated, one can hardly expect Gen. Staudt to endorse the point of view that he exerted undue influence." Yeah especially IF HE DIDN'T DO IT. YOU STUPID IGNORANT MORON.
15 posted on
09/17/2004 11:57:42 PM PDT by
JPJones
("We'll cross all our tee's and dot all our.....lower case j's")
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
CBS spokeswoman Sandy Genelius brushed off Staudt's statements: "In a debate this heated, one can hardly expect Gen. Staudt to endorse the point of view that he exerted undue influence." Unbe-freakin-lievable. They just don't stop.
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
The debate is so one-sided against CBS that the heat is on CBS and no one else.
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
CBS spokeswoman Sandy Genelius brushed off Staudt's statements: "In a debate this heated, one can hardly expect Gen. Staudt to endorse the point of view that he exerted undue influence." That is sort of true. One usually does not expect people accused of crimes to rush out to take credit for them. Still, CBS is accusing Staudt of a crime--shouldn't they give him a fair chance to respond? The fact that he has been accused by CBS now means CBS can treat him like a criminal? I don't think so.
38 posted on
09/18/2004 1:22:21 AM PDT by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
I
knew that would be their response. They're like Chatty Cathy dolls.
"Pull the string!" 40 posted on
09/18/2004 1:27:09 AM PDT by
Rastus
(Forget it, Moby! I'm voting for Bush!)
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
CBS spokeswoman Sandy Genelius brushed off Staudt's statements: "In a debate this heated, one can hardly expect Gen. Staudt to endorse the point of view that he exerted undue influence." CBS is acting like the DNC. Every witness to their lies gets smeared. I can't think of a worse way to handle a scandal than CBS has for the past 9 days.
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
What's all the hullabaloo over the "damage" to Ra™er's credibility? It is news to me that he ever had any credibility to begin with. What's next, an attack on his journalistic objectivity? HA!
64 posted on
09/18/2004 4:16:55 AM PDT by
thelastvirgil
(Idiot-proof ANYTHING, and someone will build a better idiot.)
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
"
In a debate this heated, one can hardly expect Gen. Staudt to endorse the point of view that he exerted undue influence.""Debate"? There is some "debate" about this matter? I haven't seen it. I've seen only clear evidence of fraud and temporizing by the fraudulent.
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
"Sandy Genelius"
I thought that was an STD.
68 posted on
09/18/2004 4:20:51 AM PDT by
230FMJ
(...from my cold, dead, fingers.)
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
69 posted on
09/18/2004 4:21:16 AM PDT by
New Perspective
(Proud father of a 8 month old son with Down Syndrome)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
