Skip to comments.
Ex-Guard official says questions should center on Bush's service
Lubbock Avalanche Journal ^
| Sept. 16, 2004
| Kelley Shannon
Posted on 09/16/2004 9:44:29 PM PDT by arjay
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
I searched, but did not find this. The Dims are really out to get Bush over the Guard thing.
1
posted on
09/16/2004 9:44:30 PM PDT
by
arjay
To: arjay
Watch between now and the first debate: The focus on Bush's Guard records will explode, and we will go into that first debate with a tied race...at least according to the polls Keith Oberforehead decides to quote from selectively.
To: arjay
When your adversary is making a mistake, never interrupt him.
To: arjay
4
posted on
09/16/2004 9:47:37 PM PDT
by
MEG33
(John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
To: arjay
"Why aren't we focusing on the content?" Strong said, adding that he believes there are holes in Bush's official Guard record. Could it be because the content is "make believe", Robert?
The parrot is not "resting". It's dead!
5
posted on
09/16/2004 9:48:23 PM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: arjay
They are insane with hatred.
The President has been the Commander In Chief the last four years.
People will make their minds up about him by his record as the President, not on his Guard service.
To: arjay
"Burkett said he saw documents from Bush's file discarded in a trash can a few days later at Camp Mabry in Austin. Burkett described them as performance and pay documents."
What this "journalist" neglected to mention is that the witness who could corroborate Burketts story says it never happened.
And the records he described were kept in Colorado, not Texas.
Other than that it's a pretty accurate story.
7
posted on
09/16/2004 9:51:21 PM PDT
by
Redcoat LI
("I am the great and powerful Kerry! Look at my medals!")
To: arjay
8
posted on
09/16/2004 9:52:11 PM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
To: arjay
The entire thing is ridiculous to begin with. What the president did in the guard where he served honorably matters not. What they are doing is trying make a war time President seem like he was lousy in the military. All the while a darn TRAITOR is his opponent, and the media is silent about that!
9
posted on
09/16/2004 9:52:43 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
("John Kerry reporting for spitball and typewriter duty.")
To: Darkwolf377
>>Watch between now and the first debate: The focus on Bush's Guard records will explode, and we will go into that first debate with a tied race...at least according to the polls Keith Oberforehead decides to quote from selectively<<
I really do not think there is anything "explosive" left on the NG story as far as the President is concerned.
I bet the Rather 60 minutes piece last Sunday was suppose to be the BIG early October surprise.
Can we say BACKFIRE!
To: Redcoat LI
>"Other than that it's a pretty accurate story."<
LOL
To: arjay
Those are the two fundamental questions,"
No, those are the two questions that the American people really don't give a damn about and are frankly, tired of having shoved into their ears every five minutes for four damn years.
The Democrats are simply blinded to this fact because THEY consider it the most important item. They don't give a flying flip what the American people think of this story because THEY care so much about it.
We had some of the same syndrome with Clinton, but not to this insane level.
12
posted on
09/16/2004 9:59:27 PM PDT
by
Arkinsaw
To: snarkytart
"I really do not think there is anything "explosive" left on the NG story as far as the President is concerned."
Maybe, but has that stopped them before?
I don't have any faith in the MSM just sitting back and thinking, "Oh, well, we have nothing more to unload on Bush." As I said, we will see nonstop "Questions on the President's NG service" from now on.
To: okie01
Could it be because the content is "make believe", Robert? I liked the comment from the Manchester Union-Leader:
"Rathers latest defense is that the documents might be fake, but the information they contain is real. It sounds like hes describing a novel."
14
posted on
09/16/2004 10:01:06 PM PDT
by
John Valentine
("The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein)
To: snarkytart
Well, compared to Dan Rather.
15
posted on
09/16/2004 10:01:29 PM PDT
by
Redcoat LI
("I am the great and powerful Kerry! Look at my medals!")
To: arjay
Strong, Jim Moore and Burkett seem to have been the primary sources for the CBS story. All of them are obviously Bush haters but, if I am not mistaken, none of them actually knew Bush in the TexANG.
The old secretary obviously played a role too but, for some reason, CBS ignored her insistence that the documents were fakes.
CBS apparently brushed off every disagreeing witness as "pro-Bush."
16
posted on
09/16/2004 10:02:24 PM PDT
by
Inyokern
To: Darkwolf377
The focus on Bush's Guard records will explode, and we will go into that first debate with a tied race...I doubt it. Nobody except the DNC and Rather care about Bush's Guard records. The DNC just doesn't have anything else to run with and they can't get their candidate to let go of VietNam.
See the latest Gallup Poll? With CBS's help, Bush is increasing in the polls as coverage of this story increases. I say, keep showing the picture of Bush in his uniform. It helps, not hurts.
17
posted on
09/16/2004 10:02:42 PM PDT
by
Exigence
To: Arkinsaw
If this crap were working for the Kerry and the Democrats, Bush wouldn't be up 14%.
The truth is that the Democrats are desperate and willing to try anything, no matter how low, disgusting, or insane.
18
posted on
09/16/2004 10:03:06 PM PDT
by
John Valentine
("The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein)
To: arjay
"Why aren't we focusing on the content?" Strong said, Because, you moron, even if every rumor and allegation was 100% true, at most it would mean that as a young man, Bush was somewhat of a slacker. This would be the most trivial "scandal" ever to be raised to the level of a campaign issue.
What's next -- a "Nightline" examination of the time that Bush had some overdue library books?
19
posted on
09/16/2004 10:08:23 PM PDT
by
Ichneumon
("...she might as well have been a space alien." - Bill Clinton, on Hillary, "My Life", p. 182)
To: arjay
Kerry will be dumped by the Mrs. after 11/02/04, will marry Jane Fonda, they'll settle in Cuba, the socialist paradise, and pick sugar cane. That's all fake but the thrust is what counts.
20
posted on
09/16/2004 10:09:15 PM PDT
by
Waco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson