Posted on 09/16/2004 8:26:00 PM PDT by PatriotEdition
There is nothing positive about Marva Stark
I was doing a little online research for Marva Stark, the president of the Morris County chapter “National Organization for Women” – also known as NOW. I was curious to see what her exact words were in regards to the Scott Peterson double-murder situation since today was the day that the jurors were shown horrible, graphic photos of “Baby Conners”.
Yeah, that’s right you barbaric feminists out there, you heard me, “it” has a name. “Baby Conners”. At least those of us who live in the civilized world know the baby as such. And according to the reactions of the jurors, it sure as hell was more than just a glob of cells.
On the other hand, those in the pro-abortion arena, such as the members of NOW, seem to feel differently. And they are outside of the norm as more and more Americans are becoming pro-life – and as the feminists see their pro-abortion influence dwindling, they are reaching for anything. They are getting nervous.
As I went to “google” to see what I can come up with in regards to Marva Stark, I wasn’t surprised at all that when I clicked “search”, the only things that seemed to come up on google in regards to Marva Stark was negativity. From bloggers in their “pajamas” to professional columnists – just about every write-up had nothing positive to say about this woman, or NOW in general.
That should tell us something. See for yourself. Go to google.com and type in “Marva Stark” and see the results. See the results of what a non-partisan internet search machine – a search engine that shows no favoritism – nor has any opinions – comes up with. Take a look at what most of us normal people feel about NOW.
Today there were 12 horrified jurors that saw photos of exactly the very same thing barbaric feminists of NOW and Planned Parenthood – and others – want to keep legal. A mutilated pre-born baby – that those of us with compassion know as “Baby Conners” – but Marva Stark and company know as an “it”, or a glob of cells, or a woman’s “choice”.
Marva Stark suggested that “If this is murder, well, then any time a late-term fetus is aborted, they could call it murder. There’s something about this that bothers me a little bit. Was it born, or was it unborn? If it was unborn, then I can’t see charging Scott Peterson with a double-murder.”
Was it born, or was it unborn? – Once again, you pig, “it” is known as “Baby Conners”. Yes, I am typing this to you, you murdering pig. I hope somehow, someday, you see this. I, Billy Kess – the “pajama blogger” will proudly speak for those of us who are pro-life and sickened by people like you.
Marva and the pro-abortion barbarians are running scared. They see that America mainstream is outraged over not only Laci’s murder, but the murder of her child. And this outrage is proving dangerous to the blood-stained agenda of the abortion lovers.
Perhaps it is guilt. Perhaps these feminists know that if they consider it what it is, they will then be faced with a dilemma over what they themselves stand for and support.
This isn’t about whether Scott Peterson is guilty or not. This is about charging him with a double murder. One count for Laci, and another count for Baby Conners – Two lives cut short. One cut very short. Like the millions and millions that are cut short in baby slaughter houses across the country.
Be proud, Planned Parenthood. Be proud, NOW. Be proud, Marva…
Eat, drink, and be merry.
Your days of being a strong influence on the young and confused are numbered. America is slowly seeing the light.
Billy Kess
I love this. You know, I am a newly pregnant older mom who just had an early ultrasound at 6 weeks,,,and there was a heartbeat,,you could SEEE it! They counted it! They call it a hummingbird hearbeat,,I was in tears....
I can tell you (this is my 3rd baby), you don't feel it as a baby in your stomach this early. You don't feel anything,,it's easy to dismiss what is in there as lifeless, or a bunch of cells.
I propose that every woman who wants an abortion is told she must have an ultrasound first. I want that woman to see what she is killing,,the "thing", the "it",,,God, if we had an organization that would pay for the ultrasounds if the women elected to have them,,,,I think it should be required.....it changes how you feel! It confirms,,,life!!!
Thank you :)
About the ultra-sound thing. You also reminded me of something about a year and a half ago or so, when there was someone who was offering women to get one of those photos taken of the baby they were carrying.
And again, these pro-abortion groups cried foul. Can you imagine that? What business is it of their's if a pregnant woman wants to view an ultra-sound of her own baby or a doctor wants to provide her with this photo?
After all, I thought they were pro-choice??????
They are barbarians! Shamelessly hypocritical!
Billy
Baby Connor...
I apologise - It should have been Connor, not Conners.
After all, that's why I am just a "pajama blogger" :)
Billy
I know of many younger women in their mid to late 20s, who after having been very pro-choice for years, will become pro-life after having their first child. They all comment on how the ultrasounds or Doppler monitoring of heartbeat made it clear to them that this IS a living human being inside, not a parasitic "mass of cells."
I think very few women would be able to abort if shown an ultrasound of their baby. In my perfect world, it would be required!
I agree. I think women that have had a hard time having children also become pro-life. My mom had 3 miscarriages before I survived, as a 7 month baby in 1951. My cousin's son is a robust 13 year old who arrived at 5 months, and was a prime candidate for partial birth abortion according to these feminists. You know the Vegan feminists really have it wrong: ABORTION is Murder and FUR is a woman's Right to Choose!
Abortionists will probably be the catalyst for the Second Civil War in this country.
Someday, legalized infanticide will no longer be tolerated and neither will the "judges" who keep it legal.
Our country can not just continue to allow these devils to control the direction of humanity, by proclaiming murder as a legal right.
The status quo will eventually no longer be good enough for those who still call themselves human.
CONGRATULATIONS!!!!! :)
If going soft on abortion is what "compassionate conservatism" means to some, then I want no part of it. Fortunately, it won't, as long as Bush is running the party.
Unfortunately, with all of the millions of abortions that have been performed in the US since Roe v. Wade, the number of people who have had an abortion or who have been close to someone who has had one is pretty high -- and since most people end up convincing themselves that what they do is right, it's an uphill battle.
It will be a long time before we are able to win the hearts and minds of a critical mass of Americans, who have been brainwashed on this subject by liberals, without effective, articulate, and reasoned counter-education by conservatives.
Bless you both- I've been saying that all along:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.