Skip to comments.
Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin Speak out Against Putin’s Reforms
mosnews.com ^
| 9/16/2004
| Staff
Posted on 09/16/2004 1:32:40 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
Soviet Unions last president Mikhail Gorbachev and Russias first president Boris Yeltsin expressed criticism regarding Vladimir Putins proposed reforms in Russian electoral system. Statements by Yeltsin and Gorbachev were made in exclusive interviews to Moskovskie Novosti (The Moscow News) weekly, and will be published in that newspapers Friday issue. MosNews, which is a partner publication of Moskovskie Novosti, posted full translation of both statements on our website on Thursday.
Our common goal is to do everything possible to make sure that bills, which, in essence, mean a step back from democracy, dont come into force as law. I hope that the politicians, voters, and the president himself keep the democratic freedoms that were so hard to obtain, reads Mikhail Gorbachevs statement. Soviet Unions last president, who ruled the country from 1985 to 1992, is convinced that Russian authorities must search for political solutions, negotiate with the middle-of-the-road militants, separating them from the unappeasable extremists.
His successor Boris Yeltsin, whose second presidential term ended on December 31, 1999, with a surprise announcement of his voluntary resignation (Vladimir Putin was named acting president three months before actually getting elected in March 2000), calls on the Kremlin to refrain from undermining the existing constitutional framework, despite the necessity of fighting terrorist threats.
I firmly believe that the measures that the countrys leadership will undertake after Beslan will remain within the framework of democratic freedoms that have become Russias most valuable achievement over the past decade. We will not give up on the letter of the law, and most importantly, the spirit of the Constitution our country had voted for at the public referendum in 1993. If only because the stifling of freedom and the curtailing of democratic rights is a victory by the terrorists. Only a democratic country can successfully resist terrorism and count on standing shoulder to shoulder with all of the worlds civilized countries, Yeltsin says in his statement.
Boris Yeltsins statement is viewed as a surprise move by many observers in Moscow. Unlike Mikhail Gorbachev, who is still active on Russian political scene, Yeltsin chose to refrain from public comments about Vladimir Putins politics ever since his retirement. Recently Boris Berezovsky, an exiled tycoon, renowned for his criticisms of Kremlin and Putin, published an open letter to Russias first president, urging Yeltsin to speak up and reminding him of his responsibility for the establishment of Russian constitutional democracy. Yeltsin makes no mention of Berezovskys call in his statement, but some observers tend to link his decision to break silence with the exiled oligarchs request.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: communism; napalminthemorning; putin; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 381-383 next last
To: Luis Gonzalez; Will_Zurmacht
.To: Will_Zurmacht
"... a whole lot of truly naive people in this forum who are willing to swallow the Kremlin "official story", hook, line, and sinker, when they would have never believed one thing Putin said as the head of the Soviet KGB ..."
"... I believe that there is a real possibility of this massacre being staged by the communist Old Guard, and if you don't want to believe that a government would murder its own children, then you forgot Waco, and you forgot exactly what communism can do ..."
# 53 by Luis Gonzalez
**********************************
Very good point, Luis.
Governments have often committed atrocities and then blamed their enemy for the crime, to as to justify acts that would never be accepted if not for that "criminal" pressure.
61
posted on
09/16/2004 8:30:57 PM PDT
by
exodus
To: Luis Gonzalez
nyet, gaspadeen,
I trust Puty about as far as I can spit.
But then again, I'm not justifying a dang thing he's done.
I 'm simply condemming holding school kids in schools, using bombs and guns on little girls.
Oddly, the "brilliant" strategist for the Chechens have lost the PR battle with their own stupidity.
Putin can now get away with totalitarian acts, because Russians are scared, and most in the west simply assume the Chechens and Al-Quaeda are the same thing based on their actions.
Most people don't study international conflicts. They don't really care to examine the last decade of Caucasian conflicts,
They just see dead kids on tv, and bad guys in face masks.....
So now,if Putin wasts to establish a formal thugocracy, and really get vicious, he has a internationally televised excuse...congrats dum@ss Chechen's! Brilliant move again....Now Putin can crack skulls in Chechnya, bust his enemies all over Russia, and be a "kinder, gentler" version of Uncle Joe.
Das Veedanya, Novi Roosia....
It's a lot like the Pali's in the West bank.
They don't get it.
When they blow up kids, they tend to look like @ssholes.
If they acted like Dr. King or Ghandi, got on tv showing all the "outrages" ....they would have a state by now....the problem is with sub-national groups, they tend to get violent and killed.
To: Will_Zurmacht
Yes, but before everyone here gets all hysterical, remember that regional legislators can reject Putin's choice of governor, until they agree.
It's not a complete autocracy. Or at least only in the western media.
63
posted on
09/16/2004 8:36:36 PM PDT
by
MarMema
To: Luis Gonzalez
64
posted on
09/16/2004 8:42:31 PM PDT
by
MarMema
To: Will_Zurmacht
"Oddly, the "brilliant" strategist for the Chechens have lost the PR battle with their own stupidity."Lord All Mighty...is this an actual spark of logic?
Let me ask you...
Why would YOU do something so despicable as to turn the WHOLE world's opinion against you, and in favor of your mortal enemy?
Who's benefited from Beslan the most?
65
posted on
09/16/2004 8:45:43 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
( Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?)
To: Will_Zurmacht
66
posted on
09/16/2004 8:46:22 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
( Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?)
To: Will_Zurmacht; Luis Gonzalez
To:
"... the Chechens have lost the PR battle with their own stupidity. Putin can now get away with totalitarian acts, because Russians are scared, and most in the west simply assume the Chechens and Al-Quaeda are the same thing based on their actions ... Most people don't study international conflicts. They don't really care to examine the last decade of Caucasian conflicts, They just see dead kids on tv, and bad guys in face masks..... So now,if Putin wasts to establish a formal thugocracy, and really get vicious, he has a internationally televised excuse...congrats dum@ss Chechen's ..."
# 62 by Will_Zurmacht
**********************************
There is nothing to show that this isn't anything but a small group of Muslim terrorists, probably not even from Chechnya.
Since 1994, when Russia invaded Chechnya, there hasn't been any terrorist attack I've heard about committed by a Chechen; now in a period of weeks, there are three separate high-profile attacks against Russia, all attributed to Checknya citizens.
That doesn't sound like the way Chechnya's leadership works - It sounds like new people to me, someone from outside Chechnya, maybe even a setup staged by Russia itself.
Russia can now do anything they please, as you've noted, Will_Zurmacht.
I don't think Chechnya's leaders would have make that mistake.
67
posted on
09/16/2004 8:47:59 PM PDT
by
exodus
To: Luis Gonzalez
I have personally over the years seen a lot of pro-chechens ousted here. Keep it up. Chechen supporters don't last long here.
68
posted on
09/16/2004 8:48:20 PM PDT
by
MarMema
To: MarMema
Are you threatening me?
You see...it's the Russian in you coming out.
69
posted on
09/16/2004 8:50:23 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
( Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?)
To: exodus
70
posted on
09/16/2004 8:51:03 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
( Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?)
To: Luis Gonzalez
Why would YOU do something so despicable as to turn the WHOLE world's opinion against you, and in favor of your mortal enemy?Here's a small light for your darkness. The chechens have always killed aid workers who came to their country to help them. And proudly displayed the heads after the fact. You're not going to make much progress trying to convince anyone here that the chechens have any brains. You're not going to be able to suggest that the chechens displaying those heads had Russian KGB standing behind them holding guns and saying "Now, act like you are really brutal and actually cut these heads off yourselves".
Hint, the chechens are so stupid they sent videos of themselves torturing and killing people. They came in really handy when the Russians caught a few of them. Clear evidence fore the (short) trials.
71
posted on
09/16/2004 8:52:33 PM PDT
by
MarMema
To: exodus
"I'd say that there is a much higher chance of a 9-11 style attack today than there was in 1990."
Actually I was thinking in terms of a nuke or release of a bio-agent, or chemical agents, which was the type of threat we would have faced from the russians (Nuke, mainly).
Such an attack would make a 9/11/01-type attack look puny. THAT is the kind of attack I worry about. 2 buildings going down will not put this country down. 2 or 3 major cities going down will crash our economy, close our banks, crash the market, cause tailspin unemployemnt, crash the dollar, and that is just what I can name in 30 seconds.
To: Luis Gonzalez
I am not the least bit Russian. Just letting you know.....I have seen it.
It's the pro-islamic slant that did it every time.
73
posted on
09/16/2004 8:53:51 PM PDT
by
MarMema
To: exodus
"Since 1994, when Russia invaded Chechnya, there hasn't been any terrorist attack I've heard about committed by a Chechen; now in a period of weeks, there are three separate high-profile attacks against Russia, all attributed to Checknya citizens."
What about that russian theatre that was taken by some group wearing explosives and deadman switches some time back? I do recall that they claimed to be acting with relation to problems in chechnya.
To: exodus
Thursday, 09 September 2004
Russia: Recounting The Beslan Hostage Siege -- A Chronology
By Jeremy Bransten
It has been nearly a week since the end of the hostage crisis in North Ossetia on 3 September. With each passing day, a few new details emerge about what exactly went on in Beslan. But many fundamental questions remain unanswered. RFE/RL correspondent Jeremy Bransten, in cooperation with RFE/RL's North Caucasus Service, compiles a chronology of events that recapitulates what we know so far -- from the start of the drama on Wednesday, 1 September, until its bloody conclusion on Friday, 3 September. We examine the differing official and unofficial versions and what we have yet to find out.
Prague, 9 September 2004 (RFE/RL) -- It is the first day of the Russian school year, Wednesday, 1 September.
In Beslan, a city of 30,000 inhabitants in Russia's Caucasus republic of North Ossetia, parents, students, and teachers are gathering in the early morning at the city's main school for the expected opening ceremonies.
At the same time, a group of militants, in a convoy of three passenger cars, are headed toward the school. The militants, whose identities remain unclear and whose departure point is also unknown, soon arrive at the school building.
This is what happens next, according to Russian Prosecutor-General Vladimir Ustinov's report to President Vladimir Putin: "Having arrived in Beslan, they drove into the school courtyard, where -- following the order of their leader, who went by the name of 'Colonel' -- they surrounded the schoolchildren and adults and led away all the citizens located on the square."
The parents, teachers, and children -- now hostages -- are led into the school gymnasium. For several hours, the situation remains chaotic. Parents and relatives gather outside the school buildings as police reinforcements arrive. At 11:30 a.m. North Ossetia's President Aleksandr Dzasokhov is on the scene. Putin flies to Moscow, cutting short his vacation in Sochi.
According to officials, the hostage takers request talks with local authorities and the release of detainees involved in recent attacks in Ingushetia. They also ask for well-known Moscow-based pediatrician Leonid Roshal -- who mediated the 2002 "Nord-Ost" hostage crisis in Moscow -- to be flown to Beslan. Officials say no other demands are made. They say the hostage takers are holding some 200 to 300 people and draw a link to Chechen separatist leader Aslan Maskhadov.
In fact, the militants hold some 1,200 people in conditions so cramped that some hostages are forced to sit on each other's hands and feet. According to testimony from former hostages after the crisis, the militants spend the next couple of hours laying down mines and booby traps throughout the gymnasium building.
To this day, it is unclear how they got their weapons into the school. Ustinov, in his report to Putin, claimed the hostage takers brought their arsenal with them, in their three cars. But former hostages say the militants had managed to hide weapons and explosives in the school, prior to the attack, pointing to meticulous preparation and raising questions about how they gained access to the building in the weeks prior to the hostage drama.
Shortly after 1:00 p.m., the hostage takers drop a note from one of the windows outlining their main demand: the withdrawal of Russian forces from Chechnya. The demand is widely reported by Russian news agencies, but quickly disappears and is never mentioned by officials.
Later that afternoon, Russian commandos ("spets-naz") arrive and take up positions around the school.
In an interview with Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty's North Caucasus Service, Akhmed Zakaev, the London-based spokesman for Chechen separatist leader Aslan Maskhadov, condemns the hostage takers -- rejecting Kremlin claims of Maskhadov's involvement. So far it is unclear how they got their weapons into the school. Prosecutor-General Ustinov claimed the hostage takers brought their arsenal with them. But former hostages say the militants had managed to hide weapons and explosives in the school prior to the attack.
"Claims of President Maskhadov's involvement in this terrorist act are part of a well-planned misinformation campaign, which also includes statements by [Russian] officials that there were Arab and African mercenaries among the terrorists," Zakaev said. "Their goal is to explain this terrorist act as being part of some foreign conspiracies. Those are lies."
In the early evening, Russia calls for an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council. Doctor Roshal arrives in Beslan. Night falls.
It is now Thursday, 2 September. During the night, the hostage takers speak with Roshal. The content of the conversation is unknown. Before sunrise, news comes that the UN Security Council has voted to condemn the hostage taking. Putin postpones a planned visit to Turkey.
At noon, Lev Dzugaev, the press secretary of the North Ossetian president, says "technical talks" are continuing with the hostage takers on getting them to accept deliveries of food, water, and medicine. The hostage takers' main demand remains unpublicized. Authorities continue to say around 300 hostages are in the school and that they do not know the hostage takers' motives.
At this point, Putin makes his first public comment on the crisis. During a meeting in Moscow with Jordan's King Abdullah, Putin says his main priority in ensuring the welfare of the hostages: "Our main task, of course, is to save the lives and health of those who became hostages. All actions by our forces involved in rescuing the hostages will be dedicated exclusively to this task."
Officials of the Federal Security Service (FSB) also exclude any resolution of the standoff by force.
Russian Interior Minister Rashid Nurgaliev and FSB head Nikolai Patrushev arrive in Beslan and set up a crisis team. Ruslan Aushev, former president of Ingushetia, enters the school to negotiate with the hostage takers.
Twenty-six hostages are soon released. North Ossetian presidential press secretary Lev Dzugaev calls it a "first success" and credits Aushev's negotiating skill.
That evening, at around 8:00 p.m., Dzasokhov and Aushev telephone Zakaev in London. They ask Zakaev whether Maskhadov can use his influence to end the hostage crisis. The fact of the conversation is never made public.
A few hours later, Maskhadov issues a statement on the chechen.org website harshly condemning the hostage taking. Again, Russian state media take no notice.
Three Russian tanks are brought outside the school, to the surprise of parents and local journalists gathered outside.
Overnight, a police officer is wounded by shots fired from the school. Talks are broken off, then resume on Friday, 3 September. Early in the morning, Dzasokhov and Aushev once again telephone Zakaev. He tells them Maskhadov is willing to do anything in his power to put an end to the crisis.
Zakaev detailed the conversation as well as his previous talks with Aushev and Dzasokhov, in an interview with RFE/RL: "Yesterday I spoke with the President of [North] Ossetia, [Aleksandr] Dzasokhov and the former Ingush President Ruslan Aushev, and I informed President Maskhadov about the content of our talks. For his part, Maskhadov pledged to do everything in his power to find ways to resolve this situation without blood and without harming the children. Today Dzasokhov and Aushev again called me and we spoke. I told them that I informed [Maskhadov] about our previous conversation. I also outlined [Maskhadov's] position and his efforts to do everything in his power to resolve this situation without bloodshed and any harm coming to the children. He said he was willing to look for ways to achieve this."
Shortly before noon, President Dzasokhov holds a meeting with relatives of the hostages at a Beslan cultural center. He tells them the latest information indicates there are actually over 500 hostages held in the school. Dzasokhov reiterates what many have believed since the beginning -- that the hostage takers' main demand is the withdrawal of Russian forces from Chechnya.
Minutes later, Dzosokhov's spokesman says the hostage takers have agreed to hand over the bodies of several people killed during the standoff. A car from the Emergency Situations Ministry pulls up to the school with several emergency personnel. According to the official version of events, two explosions go off inside the school. The hostage takers begin shooting at the emergency personnel as well as the crowd waiting outside the school. Chaos breaks out. A group of hostages manages to escape. Russian forces begin storming the school.
Within minutes, four Russian combat helicopters join the battle. The roof of the gymnasium collapses. Outside the school, there is mayhem, as groups of children and other hostages stream out, in the midst of gunfire from all sides.
Within a couple of hours, Russian forces claim control of most of the school, but it is not until late into the night that the shooting dies down.
The ultimate toll is horrific: over 300 dead, half of them children. More than twice that many are injured, and 200 are missing. The missing have still not been found. What happened to them remains a mystery.
The authorities initially say some of the hostage takers managed to escape during the chaos of the rescue operation. Later, they claim all of the militants have been killed, except for three who have been taken into custody. They say 10 of the dead militants are Arabs and one is an African. No proof is ever provided.
Still later, one detainee is shown on state television. He is now the only survivor, according to the authorities. His story exactly matches Ustinov's report to Putin: the attack was planned by Aslan Maskhadov and Chechen commander Shamil Basaev. The militants were directed by a sadistic madman called the 'Colonel.' Their aim from the very start was to blow up the school.
Negotiations, according to Ustinov, would have been fruitless: "Constant threats were addressed to the hostages and members of the bandit group [by the group leader]: 'We are going to die anyway, we have only one goal and that is to carry out this terrorist act.' After two days, when they started changing their system of explosives for some reason, an explosion took place, after which panic began, many of the hostages tried to escape, and the gunmen opened fire."
But the official version is contradicted by many eyewitnesses and former hostages. According to the newspaper "Izvestiya," whose reporter interviewed one of the emergency staffers who drove up to the school in the minutes before the siege was broken, there were no initial explosions.
He said someone -- he does not know who -- opened fire from outside the school, at which point the militants fired back. Then came the explosions. Other witnesses suggest the initial gunfire might have come from among the crowd of parents and relatives waiting outside the school. Some say the explosions were actually Russian tank fire, which blew off part of the school's roof.
Moscow-based military analyst Pavel Felgenhauer also doubts the Kremlin's version of an unplanned, last-minute decision to storm the school, saying the appearance of attack helicopters points to a coordinated, pre-planned move.
"Although there is an air base near Beslan, I know how much time it takes to transmit instructions to pilots. Even if the helicopter was fueled, armed, and waiting, and the pilots were already suited up -- if it had been a spontaneous decision -- they would have had to wait for instructions. An order would have had to be given. They would have had to get aboard, to warm up the engine. They could not have made it to the school in less than half an hour or even more," Felgenhauer said.
Whether the hostage takers intended to die from the very start is also unclear. They did in fact have a demand -- the withdrawal of Russian forces from Chechnya -- despite the Kremlin's initial denial of any motive.
And it appears they were also open to talks. In addition to the negotiations with Aushev, one former hostage interviewed by "Izvestiya," a 15-year-old-girl, says she spent several minutes talking to the chief militant who told her of the pain of losing his daughter in the war in Chechnya. Shouldn't a professional psychologist have been included in the negotiating team, "Izvestiya" asks?
But asking too many questions does not seem to pay off. "Izvestiya" Editor in Chief Raf Shakirov said he was forced to resign after the paper's publisher objected to his "negative" coverage of the crisis. RFE/RL Russian Service correspondent Andrei Babitskii was detained at a Moscow airport on charges of hooliganism and never made it to Beslan. Anna Politkovskaya, another well-known reporter with extensive experience in the Caucasus, said she was poisoned on her flight out of Moscow, en route to Beslan. After losing consciousness, she awoke in a hospital in Rostov-na-Donu.
Ruslan Aushev, who could hold many of the answers to the hostages' identities and motives, has disappeared, turning off his cell phone.
75
posted on
09/16/2004 8:58:31 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
( Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?)
To: MarMema; Luis Gonzalez
To: Luis Gonzalez
I have personally over the years seen a lot of pro-chechens ousted here. Keep it up. Chechen supporters don't last long here.
# 68 by MarMema
**********************************
Luis Gonzalez isn't pro-Chechnya, he's anti-tyranny.
As we all are.
This tragedy is being used as an excuse to destroy freedom within Russia.
The Russian government started this war, they started the atrocities, and they probably had something to do with the deaths at that school.
76
posted on
09/16/2004 8:59:43 PM PDT
by
exodus
To: MarMema
You have spent days accusing people of being "Russian haters" for being critical of Putin's policies, all the while, what has been exposed by your words, is you hatred of the Chechen people.
77
posted on
09/16/2004 9:00:26 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
( Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?)
To: exodus; MarMema
Thanks.
MarMemma claims anyone who criticizes the actions of the Russian government under Putin is a "Russian hater", meanwhile, what's truly crystal clear is that MarMema is a Chechen hater.
78
posted on
09/16/2004 9:02:18 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
( Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?)
To: Luis Gonzalez
um, ok....
you lost me when you came up with the "Russians maybe staged this"....c'mon, you can do better than that. Next you'll tell me Bush staged 9-11 to pass the patriot act...(oops, sorry, thats an actual argument for some folks on the other board, sorry to offend)
and as for my being a liar about your support for the Chechens..hehe. Have you been reading your post? Good heavens man!
You've basically bent over backwards to use the tried and true "But he hit me first" argument.
Yes, Russian troops have committed atrocities. Besides Vodka and sodomy, it's one of their oldest traditions.
That still doesn't justify doing the same thing. Bin Laden killed innocents. So now I can feel justified when I hijack a plane and crash into a builing in Saudi Arabia killing 3,000 offfice workers and secretaries...."Hey, I didn't start it!"
If Russians commit savage acts and you want the world to know about it....
Document the atrocities. Publicize the atrocities. Prosecute the atrocities. Don't repeat the atrocities.
If Russians commit savage acts and you want revenge on the Russian Army.... Find the Russian Army, fight the Russian Army and kill them.
I just can't buy this logic..... Russians civilians get mad about Beslan (the atrocity) and then they get on busses in Chechnya and blow them up (sound familiar?)
How about this then? Russian civilians angry about Beslan atrocities blow up 2 planes full of Chechnyans at the same time over Chechnya...you know, crazy stuff like that.
The point I've tried to makes is :
1. Chechen terrorist were wrong to kill kids. If they want a fight, fight against fighters. Same goes for Russians, Pali's, and Mongolians.There's no way to say "They committed an outrage, an atrocity...The Russians killed kids, so now we get to kill kids......
2. It was actually a horrible blunder strategically.Talk about bad PR....
3. Russia, under Putin, will probably use this to become less New Russia, and more Old Soviet Union. I don't mean to get on you, but for Cripesake, have you really sat down and thought through your argument? Anyhow....wishing you all the best.........
To: Will_Zurmacht
Why?
You don't believe a government can murder its children?
Now, either put up a link of me being supportive of the Chechens or shut the hell up!
If you HAD a brain, you wouldn't mistake being critical of Putin with being supportive of Chechnya.
80
posted on
09/16/2004 9:06:13 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
( Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 381-383 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson