Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WAS THE DNC INVOLVED? TIME TO CONNECT THE DOTS
various

Posted on 09/16/2004 6:57:57 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201 next last
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Burkett Admits in February Weblog that He Saw Killian Documents in the Trash
81 posted on 09/16/2004 8:08:14 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Comrade Hillary - 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

That's why Burkett was offered up to all the media last night, conveniently, right after the secretary's piece on 60 minutes. Rep in Congress saw that, pulled back the requested investigation, and now the ball is back our blogosphere's court. An investigation would pre-empt the bigger story here, which is a coordinated effort between the DNC/CBS and the Democratic Candidate for President.


82 posted on 09/16/2004 8:11:13 AM PDT by mabelkitty (Watch for a CBS employee in a trench coat going by DeepWord.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago; TankerKC; Peach; cyncooper; doug from upland; Mia T; ALOHA RONNIE; abner

ping


83 posted on 09/16/2004 8:11:34 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Comrade Hillary - 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

This may be a point of interest. Most Kinko type places have video monitors. The fax usually indicates a date and time. Would it not be of interest to review the video's of the time an place in question? Not that CBS would have any interest in revealing that.


84 posted on 09/16/2004 8:11:47 AM PDT by AMNZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

85 posted on 09/16/2004 8:12:07 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Comrade Hillary - 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Barnstormer
The significance of the "unimpeachable source" comment Rather made now takes on real significance.

It does for me. Jerry Killian's widow is a "Bushie," or "partisan political operative." She doesn't count for anything. Jerry Killian's fellow officers who do not back the CBS story's premise (several) are the same sort of unreliable people. They mean nothing.

Ben Barnes, perjurer and Democratic fundraiser ("Hey! What's the matter with THAT?") though he may be, is an unimpeachable source. Bill Burkett, never mind his past mental health problems and seeming fixation with Bush, is an unimpeachable source. They and any documents they bring are a "preponderance of evidence."

If CBS's own experts warn in advance that the documents at very best cannot be authenticated and are highly questionable, the "preponderance of evidence" means it's OK to go ahead.

That indeed tells me something. This story was going to happen no matter what. Probably because something called OPERATION FAVORITE SON demanded that it happen.

86 posted on 09/16/2004 8:12:07 AM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Dan Rather's talking points vs John Kerry's Talking points

  1. Did a wealthy Texas oilman-friend of the Bush family use his influence with the speaker of the Texas House of Representatives .. to get George W. Bush a coveted slot in the National Guard .. keeping him out of the draft and any probable service IN Vietnam?
  2. Did Lieutenant Bush refuse a direct order from his commanding officer?
  3. Was Lieutenant. Bush suspended for failure to perform up to standards?
  4. Did Lieutenant Bush ever take a physical he was required and ordered to take? If not, why not?
  5. And did Lieutenant Bush, in fact, complete his commitment to the Guard?

TRANSCRIPT OF RATHER REPORT [09/10 07:03 PM]


  1. Bush Has Said He Used No Special Treatment To Get Into The Guard. How Does He Explain The Fact That He Jumped Ahead Of 150 Applicants Despite Low Pilot Aptitude Scores?
  2. Col. Albert Lloyd Said A Report From Alabama To Ellington Should Have Been Filed. Where Is That Report?
  3. Why Did Bush Miss His Medical Exam In 1972?
  4. Where Are The Complete Results Of The Required Investigation Into Bush’s Absence From The Exam?
  5. Why Did Bush Specifically Request To NOT Be Sent Overseas For Duty?
  6. Why Does The White House Say Bush Was On Base When Bush’s Superiors Had Filed A Report Saying He Was Gone For A Whole Year?
  7. Why Is The Pentagon Under Orders To Not Discuss Bush’s Record With Reporters?
  8. Where Are Bush’s Flight Logs?
  9. Why Hasn’t Bush Himself Demonstrated That He Showed Up For Service in Alabama?

John Kerry for President - Key Unanswered Questions: Bush’s Record In The National Guard

 

87 posted on 09/16/2004 8:16:53 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights (What part of SHALL MAKE NO LAW do they not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: AMNZ

I hope the FEC and FBI are looking into this.

This is not my opinion as a conservative. This is my opinion as an American that will not tolerate fraud in the electoral process.


88 posted on 09/16/2004 8:16:59 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: wildbill; Protect the Bill of Rights

Here's the thing about people who are legitimately unstable. They operate in their own world. I don't think Burkett knows the plot, but he won't take a bullet for the DNC. If they offer him up, watch him turn so quick heads will spin. He may be mad at Bush, but the DNC are going to stab him in the back - big difference. He has some obvious delusions of granduer and paranoia - not a good mix.

I am betting the secret service has tabs on him, so he won't be "committing suicide" any time soon either.

If you read comments from his attorney today, his attorney (read about him upthread) sounded pretty nervous. If Burkett decides to unload, which he might, it will be all over. He didn't type the memos - they were interspersed with his stuff to make it look like they came from him. As for the Kinko's account? Well, yes. He's been faxing them to everybody. He's nuts.

He'll unload on one of those reporters if some law enforcement shows up to talk to him. Just watch.
IMHO ; )


89 posted on 09/16/2004 8:17:03 AM PDT by mabelkitty (Watch for a CBS employee in a trench coat going by DeepWord.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
The physical that the dummies are harping on is one where it is given to MAINTAIN FLIGHT STATUS as a pilot. The base where Bush was going to DID NOT HAVE F102's, the aircraft that G W was train for....no plane, no need for the physical. It's the only thing that the dummies have to get their knickers twisted over. It has been hashed over for the past 12 years...and nothing,NOTHING, has ever been found to be out of the normal...THUS WE HAVE FORGERIES!!!


Doogle
90 posted on 09/16/2004 8:17:23 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF...8th AF...Wolf Pack...408MMS ....Ubon,Thailand in "69" Night Line Delivery.AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Dear Protect,

I haven't looked closely at the entire thread, so maybe someone else has noted this. Mr. Burkett is a Democrat Party operative.

See this URL: http://ace.mu.nu/archives/046126.php

Note especially:

"Shadowy Link Uncovered: Apparently the noted former-Bush-supporter Burkett served as head of the Steering Committee for David Van Os campaign for Texas Party Chair [of the Democrat Party]."

Here is a URL from 2002 in which Mr. Burkett describes some of his activities in the Texas Democrat Party:

http://www.geocities.com/stoutdem/bb525.html

Bill Burkett is a Democrat operative who likely forged documents to libel a sitting president.


sitetest


91 posted on 09/16/2004 8:18:28 AM PDT by sitetest (Spitball Kerry for Collaborator-in-Chief!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

A lunatic doesn't hire an attorney running for Supreme Court of Texas. Absolutely not.


92 posted on 09/16/2004 8:18:40 AM PDT by mabelkitty (Watch for a CBS employee in a trench coat going by DeepWord.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: applpie

OK you are CBS and you get faxed memo which you have to confirm. If the DNC said it was good would you run with it? If some crank from Texas said it was good would you run with it? Does it seem odd that they get this memo just when Kerry is getting killed by the Swifties?

CBS was told it was good by a reliable souce they trusted, the DNC/Kerry campaign. Now if only Dan will tell the truth. HaHaHa I made a joke.


93 posted on 09/16/2004 8:19:29 AM PDT by 1smallVoice (Clinton brought us Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PigRigger

That is so September 8 talk.
Please.


94 posted on 09/16/2004 8:19:57 AM PDT by mabelkitty (Watch for a CBS employee in a trench coat going by DeepWord.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

You need Missy Kelley to connect the dots. The best I've ever seen.


95 posted on 09/16/2004 8:21:35 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AMNZ

Good One!
If the memos were faxed by Burkett the night before broadcast (or whenever Dan originally claimed), then Burkett was set-up "just in case".

It has already been proven Rather and CBS both had the memos prior to that date/time, and this was to cover for it in case they were busted!


96 posted on 09/16/2004 8:21:59 AM PDT by mabelkitty (Watch for a CBS employee in a trench coat going by DeepWord.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

I've got a memo from Kerry to Rather, asking for some help, and suggesting that CBS come up with a story to deflect from the Swift Boat issue. I'll publicize it as soon as the ink is dry!


97 posted on 09/16/2004 8:26:04 AM PDT by HenryLeeII (sultan88, R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty

Huh? Please be specific.


98 posted on 09/16/2004 8:28:03 AM PDT by PigRigger (Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights; Howlin; NYCVirago; Buckhead; TankerKC
Connect the dots ping... (I'm a little late with this one, you may have already seen it)

Bush's Brain Author Central Figure in Rather-Gate

99 posted on 09/16/2004 8:30:43 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Comrade Hillary - 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

White House Says Memos Part of DNC Plot

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1217788/posts

They must have proof.
Let's start sending this to some of the blogs for follow-up.


100 posted on 09/16/2004 8:30:53 AM PDT by mabelkitty (Watch for a CBS employee in a trench coat going by DeepWord.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson