Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Liz
Now in brain dead New Jersey mc sleezy's numbers will go up. After all, what could be more noble, more sympathetic than a crooked homosexual politician?
6 posted on 09/16/2004 4:08:01 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 ( Kerry's not "one of us": catholicsagainstkerry.com. needs your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jmaroneps37; Calpernia
......what could be more noble, more sympathetic than a crooked homosexual politician?....

(Sniffle) McG's a "victim" (sob).

7 posted on 09/16/2004 4:37:30 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

That's right. He isn't just gay, he's a "gay American." How cute that he should make it sound so very politically correct.


10 posted on 09/16/2004 11:54:07 AM PDT by Motherhood IS a career
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
...what could be more noble, more sympathetic than a crooked homosexual politician?

I think the homosexual part is a smokescreen for the real story of his resignation announcement. Only in Post-Clinton America does the populace see nothing at all wrong with an affair between a person and someone who must report to that person in employment (e.g., between a supervisor and employee/intern/lower-ranking person). People used to understand that there's no way such an interaction could be truly consensual, as consent cannot freely be refused in a relationship of that sort. Now, that point seems lost to many (and it's especially interesting how radical feminists--who focus so much on "power" in relationships--looked away).

Note that Clinton evaded the question of his possible perjury -- or, at a minimum, misleading a grand jury -- regarding his alleged criminal behavior toward Paula Jones, by the MSM focusing on the SEX aspect of the Lewinsky story. I believe that now McG has done a similar thing by evading the corruption question -- and the "abuse of power" question -- by leading the MSM to focus on the homosexuality question, which also distracts the right and left into old debates about that issue, rather than his own sleaze. People just fell right into it, and ignore the real way he has demonstrated that he's totally unfit for office right now.

Does anyone agree?

11 posted on 09/16/2004 11:57:35 AM PDT by Gondring (They can have my Bill of Rights when they pry it from my cold, dead fingers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson