I wouldn't be surprised if Fulbright et al deliberately circumnavigated that issue....AFAIK all testimony, House or Senate, is under oath.
I wouldn't be surprised if Fulbright et al deliberately circumnavigated that issue....I remember them swearing him in.
It would be impossible for John f-ing Kerry to tell the truth, under oath or not.
And so what can he say I never said that stuff? Or better yet I was under the influence of drugs when I made that testimony..Or more close to the truth... I am a psycopath that one day aspires to be president because I was born in the west wing and my initials are JFK.... JFK.... JFK... doesn't that tell you stupid americans anything... and I already hired my psychic John Edwards.. He channels the first JFK through me... .... What a nut....
Some of those Senators were providing funds to VVAW. McGovern was a sponsor. Dellums was involved. I can't remember which one it was that got donations for them.
What really bothers me is that the FBI records are declassified but many of the names have been redacted. I think we should be allowed to know who was doing what!
FWIW, according to the transcript on C-SPAN, Kerry was NOT sworn.
http://www.c-span.org/vote2004/jkerrytestimony.asp
My understanding is that participants in "informal hearings" are frequently not sworn, and I haven't seen hard evidence that Kerry was under oath. If anyone has such evidence, please let me know...
I don't think he did get sworn in. At least not according to the transcript.
As far as I remember, he was sworn in.
However, in his testimony, he quotes others.
The admission came in an interview on TV outside that was not sworn. However, he is on tape.
Nixon was impeached for lying to America. Kerry should be refused as presidential material for doing such.
He says Kerry was sworn in:
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:lqD-0mS5OIYJ:www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/7/2/212352.shtml+john+kerry+sworn+in+vietnam+testimony&hl=en