When you get letters published please share and encourage others.
Mrs. Heinz-Kerry and her connection to The Tides Foundation is not ‘new‘ news. The Tides Foundation’s connection to moveon.org isn’t breaking news, either. Nor is moveon.org’s connection to Texans for Truth. What is lesser known is the Communist Party’s willingness to back Kerry in this election. They’ve encouraged their members to vote for him instead of their own candidate. Their sole reason? Getting rid of President Bush. The W.W.W.P. (The Socialist Party) openly brags of infiltrating the unions. They brag about having Party members placed in positions to negotiate contracts for union memberships. Many of the people who give money to these organizations and political parties are common to all of them as financial endorsers - except for The Tides Foundation. They’ve created a loophole. It’s called the Tides Center. Many of these individuals and organizations also finance International A.N.S.W.E.R., Greenpeace, and other such political activism. CBS has some members of the Communist Party employed in rather high places as well. A comparative analysis between “The Communist Manifesto” and the current mission statements of several known groups and political parties is also in order. Pop Quiz: Guess whose philanthropic trust is financing, in part or in whole, all of these rabidly anti-American groups, lobbyists, PAC’s, and parties? Hint: The AFL-CIO is technically not a trust.
You don’t have to believe me. Do your own research.
A CBS connection:
http://www.wethepeople.la/cockburn.htm
http://www.fact-index.com/a/an/andrew_cockburn.html
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1091961/posts http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/pacepa200402260828.asp http://www.politics1.com/parties.htm http://exposingsatanism.org/Forum/lofiversion/index.php/t65.html find out who is connected with who...
http://www.cpusa.org/ http://www.internationalanswer.org/endorsers.html http://www.workers.org/ http://www.infoshop.org/texts/wwp.html http://www.laweekly.com/ink/02/50/news-corn.php http://www.greens.org/s-r/31/31-09.html http://www.sp-usa.org/labor/ http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/Links.htm http://www.gp.org/links.html ...and follow the money:
http://www.opensecrets.org/parties/index.asp http://www.activistcash.com/ Pay particular attention to moveon.org...and its connections...
Much of the money is coming from out of the country. Follow it, if you dare.
I do recommend that one does one's own research into these matters.
Bones
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=3778 http://25thaviation.org/johnkerry/default.htm http://home.nycap.rr.com/pwcarter/the%20kerry%20page.html http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2004/04/john_kerrys_dat.html http://www.vnsfvetakerry.com/War%20Criminal.htm http://www.command-post.org/2004/2_archives/cat_kerry.html I put this next one in here because I thought it was interesting.
http://www.slobokan.com/index.php http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/9/3/110242.shtml http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=40272 http://www.netwmd.com/articles/article694.html http://www.nationalreview.com/kerry/kerryspot.asp http://ice.he.net/~freepnet/fbifiles/100-HQ-448092/Section%2015/Section%2015.pdf http://home.nycap.rr.com/pwcarter/the%20kerry%20page.html http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1062437/posts http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/Printer&cid=1094279634083&p=1006953079865 This one is more about Bush than kerry, but answers questions concerning the President's NG service.
http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20040831-094211-3678r.htm http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/editorial/9576373.htm?1c http://hail.he.net/~danger/kerrylied/staticpages/index.php?page=20040711225111152#cont http://www.vnsfvetakerry.com/INDEX%20PAGE.HTM http://kerrywaffles.net/reynolds.html http://www.suntimes.com/output/elect/cst-nws-novak271.html You just gotta like folks from Iowa...
http://www.iowapresidentialwatch.com/KerryTales/KerryAmmo.htm
Warren "Bones" Bonesteel
columnist and author
"Morning Coffee"
P. O. Box 1413
Rapid City,SD 57709
(605) 388-3005
wrbones@rap.midco.net http://morningcoffee.net/index.php
"The virtues of men are of more consequence to society
than their abilities, and for this reason, the heart
should be cultivated with more assiduity than
the head." -Noah Webster
http://morningcoffee.net/index.php http://www.jump2net.com/stuff/button.gif http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1196878/posts http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1199225/posts http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A29821-2004Aug24.html http://www.grassboots.org/DNC-MoveOn.htm http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/08/25/wed/index.html http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1198958/posts http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=7032 * Harold Ickes Is A Member Of DNC's Executive Committee And Head Of The
Media Fund And Chief Of Staff To America Coming Together. Ickes "Admits That
He Occasionally Tells The Kerry Camp What He's Up To, And He Insists It's
Perfectly Legal."
(Jim Drinkard, "'Outside' Political Groups Full Of Party Insiders," USA
Today, 6/28/04; Paula Dwyer, "Why 527 Is The Dems' Lucky Number,"
BusinessWeek Online, 7/28/04)
* Bob Bauer Of Perkins Coie Is Legal Counsel To Both Kerry Campaign And
America Coming Together (ACT).
(Jim Rutenberg And Kate Zernike, "Veteran's Group Had GOP Lawyer," The New
York Times, 8/25/04)
* Kerry Campaign Paid Bauer's Law Firm, Perkins Coie, $360,244.28 For Legal
Services And Other Expenses.
(Federal Election Commission Records,
http://www.fec.gov, Accessed 8/5/04)
* Joe Sandler Is General Counsel To DNC While Serving As Legal Counsel To
527s MoveOn.org And Moving America Forward.
(Jonathan Groner, "Power Punch," Legal Times, 4/26/04)
* Erik Smith Is The Media Fund's Executive Director And Worked With Steve
Elmendorf, Kerry's Deputy Campaign Manager, On Dick Gephardt's Presidential
Campaign.
(Jim VandeHei, "Kerry Expected To Emerge From Battle Stronger Than Ever,"
The Washington Post, 3/3/04)
* Minyon Moore, A Kerry Campaign Consultant, Serves On Executive Committee
Of America Coming Together.
(Glen Johnson, "Kerry To Press 'Environmental Justice,'" The Boston Globe,
4/22/03; Lisa Getter, "Kerry Aided By 'Illegal' Soft Money, GOP Claims," Los
Angeles Times, 4/1/04)
* Media Fund Ad Consultant Bill Knapp Hired By Kerry Campaign.
(Thomas B. Edsall, "Shifting The Money So The Votes Will Follow," The
Washington Post, 5/11/04)
* Kerry's New Mexico Caucus Director, Geri Prado, Is Leading ACT's GOTV
Effort In That State.
(Michael Finnegan, "Kerry's Low Profile May Cost Crucial Latino Votes," Los
Angeles Times, 5/3/04)
* The Dewey Square Group Provides Political Consulting Services For Both
Kerry Campaign And America Coming Together (ACT).
* Kerry Campaign Has Paid Dewey Square Group $194,936.48 For Political
Consulting And Other Expenses.
(Federal Election Commission Records, www.fec.gov, Accessed 8/5/04)
* America Coming Together (ACT) Has Paid Dewey Square Group $51,808 For
Political Consulting And Other Expenses.
(Political Money Line Website, www.tray.com, Accessed 8/5/04)
* At Least Four Kerry Advisors Are Associated With Dewey Square Group:
Michael Whouley, Jill Alper, Minyon Moore And Joe Ricca.
(Glen Johnson, "Kerry To Press 'Environmental Justice,'" The Boston Globe,
4/22/03; Dewey Square Group Website,
http://www.deweysquare.com/, Accessed
2/5/04; Peter Grier, "How Kerry Turned The Corner," Christian Science
Monitor, 2/5/04; Glen Johnson and John Aloysius Farrell, "Kerry's New-Look
Campaign Relies On A Few Key Players," The Boston Globe, 1/9/03)
* Michael Meehan, Now A Communications Advisor To Kerry, Was Hired By NARAL
In 2003 To "Oversee Its Vastly Expanded Soft-Money Operation." His Hiring
Was "Billed As A Two-Month Leave From His Job As Political Director Of
NARAL."
(Carol Beggy and Mark Shanahan, "Names," The Boston Globe, 11/21/03; Chris
Cillizza, "NARAL Plans Big '04 Effort," Roll Call, 5/8/03)
http://www.democrats.org/wvc/weekinreview/200305120002.html Open admission
to affiliation with moveon.org.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=14836 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1091961/posts http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1202498/posts http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1207686/posts http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20040908-025244-1548r.htm http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11504 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1205510/posts http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1205828/posts http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1211288/posts http://www.netwmd.com/articles/article704.html http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/9/2/185315.shtml http://www.californiarepublic.org/archives/Columns/Gamble/20040903GambleMoveOn.html http://www.soros.org/initiatives/justice/focus_areas/justice_fellows/guidelines/media http://www.baltictimes.com/art.php?art_id=10786 SOROS LINK!
http://thecollege.wlu.edu/grants/soros.asp Grants and Fellowships
Soros FellowshipThe Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowships for New Americans
provides opportunities for continuing generations of able and accomplished
New Americans to achieve leadership in their chosen fields. All applicants
must be either resident aliens (e.g. hold a Green Card), naturalized U.S.
citizens, or children of two parents who are both naturalized citizens.
The Soros Foundation annually awards thirty scholarships of $20,000, plus
half of the tuition owed to the graduate school program of the applicant's
choice, for a period of two years. A Fellow may pursue a graduate degree in
any professional field (e.g., engineering, medicine, law, social work, etc.)
or scholarly discipline in the Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences, and
Sciences. The Fine and Performing Arts are included.
Applications are due from seniors in early November, and candidates should
expect to participate in an interview as the vetting process transpires.
Liaison Officer: Professor Robert Strong (Politics) or Associate Dean Bent
Consult the program website at http:// www.pdsoros.org.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1197027/posts http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39eab7333557.htm Lobbying may now be considered a Daschle family profession. The Senator and
Mrs. Daschle's son Nathan was a lobbyist for the American Federation of
State, County and Municipal Employees before taking a position at the
Washington lobbying firm of Covington and Burling. Covington and Burling
represents Microsoft, Merck, and the Washington Post among others.
The Daschles' daughter-in-law, Jill Gimmel Daschle, has started her own
lobbying firm, JD Consulting, which will lobby with Sullivan & Baldick. Jill
was a finance director for the 2000 re-election campaign of Sen. Ted Kennedy
(D-MA). She moved on to New Hampshire Gov. Jeanne Shaheen's 2002 senate
campaign as a fundraiser.
>
>
>
http://www.politicalaffairs.net/ >
>
http://uslaboragainstwar.org/links.php >
>
http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/5637/1/143/ >
>
http://www.publicintegrity.org/527/search.aspx?act=com&orgid=648 >
>
http://www.publicintegrity.org/527/docs/460450996-8872-0012.pdf >
http://dbease.argusleader.com/dbEase/cgi-bin/go_get.pl >
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0201.mencimer.html > evidence of duplicity.
>
http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/a-b/adamo/2004/adamo090204.htmI'm working on this one right now. Anyone interested can pick and choose for their own letters. I know it needs work.
Editor,
Polls across the nation continue to show that the war on terror and security are key issues that Americans will take with them into the voting booths this November. And paramount to the handling of these issues will be the foreign policy that the next president develops for our nation. We know how President Bush has and will likely continue to use foreign policy as a tool to fight world terrorism as it attempts to humble nations, kill indiscriminately and work towards the creation of an extremist Islamic empire.
But how will John Kerry formulate and utilize a foreign policy that will not take us back to September 10, 2001? We can only look at what Mr. Kerry has said and done during his Senate career, and to those who are supporting his candidacy. Based on his own votes over his 19 years in the Senate, Mr. Kerry appears to be formulating a foreign policy and a national security plan without the benefit of a strong military, or a strong and effective intelligence network. For in both of these areas, he has consistently voted to reduce spending almost indiscriminately. He has voted to:
· Kill the Defend America Act of 1996,
· Cut or eliminate almost every major military program including submarines, light infantry units, tactical fighter wings, the Navy's coastal mine-hunting program,and a significant forced retirement of 60,000 members of the armed forces.
· Slash military spending including pay raises on several occasions.
· Cut or eliminate almost every major military development program, including the B-2 Bomber and missile defense programs.
· Halt programs that would place or continue trade restrictions on nations such as Cuba, China, and Vietnam.
· Slash the budgets of intelligence agencies.
And while Mr. Kerry continually favored communist states including Nicaragua, Cuba, North Vietnam and later Vietnam, he has voted against US military efforts including Kosovo, the 1991 Gulf War, and voted against funding for our troops in Iraq, in a conflict that Mr. Kerry himself voted to authorize!
So, it should come as no surprise that Mr. Kerry now receives direct support in his presidential bid from such renowned organizations as the Democratic Socialists of America. Other leftist organizations such as the Communist Party of the US, Progressive Labor Party, the League of Revolutionaries, and International A.N.S.W.E.R, a communist backed anti-war organization, openly push for the defeat of President Bush, for they understand that John Kerry, not George Bush is a step toward the achievement of their totalitarian goals.
So as you enter the voting booth in November, keep in mind the importance of a strong and determined hand in the war on terror. Both of these candidates have established records to compare. Before you cast that ballot, ask yourself who would better prosecute and ultimately win this war.
Just thought I`d get back,I`ve sent a number of letters to the editor on a few talking points including the debate, no bites yet, but "Don`t give up the ship!" Come on fellow freepers, lets keep up the charge.Here`s an example of my "Global Test" letter.
Senator Kerry stated he believes the United States should pass a "global test" before using preemptive force. While he prefaced this by saying he wouldn`t cede "the right to preempt in any way", the question inevitably arises; who will develop, then score this test?
U.N. Secretary General, Kofi Annan believes the liberation of Iraq was "illegal" and that "there should have been a second resolution" authorizing the liberation. Annan is implying that only unanimous permission from the security council can authorize force.
Given current revelations concerning the UN`s Oil-for-Food program, one wonders how all the alleged corruption may have influenced their decisions concerning Iraq. These developments include a recently leaked confidential report alleging the program allowed Saddam Hussein to allocate discounted oil to nations of his choice such as France and Russia,influential voices against UN action. The report, a catalog of fraud, is being examined along with a host of other documents by at least five Congressional Committees including the Senate Governmental Affairs Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations whose Chairman, Senator Norm Coleman, stated; "From our perspective this is a scandal of overwhelming proportions".
So if Kerry doesn`t intend to cede our preemptive rights to this allegedly corrupt and untrustworthy organization, who will decide the criteria for this "test", the U.S. government? Isn`t that what President Bush and Congress have already done? Why suggest the erroneous and misleading concept of a "global test" at all? It certainly seems the U.N. merits no further opportunity to abuse it`s deservedly limited authority.
With a little luck, I`ll get a bite. Keep your fingers crossed, and good luck to all freepers.
