Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TEXAS GUARD SECRETARY SURFACES: SAYS CBS DOCS 'FORGERIES', BUT ...
Drudge ^ | 9/14/04

Posted on 09/14/2004 3:50:57 PM PDT by ambrose

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX TUE SEP 14, 2004 17:48:35 ET XXXXX

TEXAS GUARD SECRETARY SURFACES: SAYS CBS DOCS 'FORGERIES', BUT STANDS BY ACCUSATIONS AGAINST BUSH

The DRUDGE REPORT has found Lt. Col. Jerry Killian's former secretary who claims that the Texas Air National Guard documents offered by CBS in its 60 MINUTES II report filed by Dan Rather last week are indeed 'forgeries'.

"I did not type these particular memos. I typed memos like these," Knox told the DRUDGE REPORT from her home in Houston.

"I typed memos that had this information in them, but I did not type these memos. There are terms in these memos that are not Guard terms but that are Army terms. They use the word 'Billets'. I think they were using that to refer to the slot. That would be a non-flying slot the way we would use it. And the style... they are sloppy looking."

But Marion Carr Knox stands by the accusations contained in the allegedly fraudulent documents that Bush skirted a medical and flight exam without suffering institutional repercussions.

"The information in these memos is correct -- like Killian's dealing with the problems."

"It was General Staudt, not then Lt. Colonel Hodges [who succeeded Staudt], that was putting on the pressure to whitewash Bush. For instance he didnt take his flight examination or his physical. And the pilots had to take them by their birthdays. Once in a while there would be a reason why a pilot would miss these things because some of them were commercial pilots. But they had to make arrangements to take their exams."

Knox speculated as to how she thought the forgeries were created saying, "My guess is that someone in the outfit got hold of the real ones and discussed it with a former Army person."

Knox worked for the Guard from 1957 until she retired in 1979, and she was Lt. Col. Killian's secretary during the time President Bush served in Texas.

Contacted by the DRUDGE REPORT, Lt. Col. Killian's son Gary, who also served in the unit during the same period, responded: "I know Marion Carr. I remember her as a sweet lady who reminded me then of a dear aunt."

"But if Staudt had put pressure on my dad, there would have been a blow-up -- instantly. It was one of the reasons they got along so well. They had a mutual respect for one another."

"As has been pointed out by so many others, then Col Staudt had been out of the unit for 18 months. And I stand by my previous comments regarding my dad's admiration for Lt. Bush and his regard for him as an officer and pilot -- which was exemplary."

Knox told the DRUDGE REPORT that she did not vote for Bush in 2000 because he is 'unqualified' for the job, and does not intend to vote for him in 2004, either.

"Bush was not the only person of privilege who had a spot in the Guard. Senator [Lloyd] Bensen's nephew was in headquarters. There was a big jewelery store, Gordons. Their son was in the Guard. The owner of Batelstein's, a posh department store in the area, his son was in. The other kids couldn't get in like that. Hugh Roy Cullen's grandson was also in. He was a big oil man."

Knox, however, did have some kind words about then Lt. Bush.

"[Bush] was always pleasant and gentlemanly to me," she said. "I never noticed him not being respectful. I thought he was a nice young man and that he must have had very nice parents to produce a son as nice as he seemed to be."

Knox has been following the story since last week when the 60 MINUTES II broadcast aired, and on Friday she contacted the HOUSTON CHRONICLE wanting to tell her side of the story. Since then the DALLAS MORNING NEWS has also contacted her.

"What really hecked me off was when it was somebody on TV, associated with the White House, who said that all of this information was lies. And I got excited at the time because I knew that I had typed documents with this information because a person like Bush stood out from the others -- because of his association with his father."

Asked about reports that Lt. Col. Killian's wife and son saying he didn't type, Knox stated, "He didn't need to. He had me."

Knox explains that the August 18, 1973 date typed on one of the "forged" documents proves that they were faked. Group Commander Staudt, who allegedly had been putting pressure on Killian, retired in 1972.

To the best of her recollection, Knox explains that Staudt must have put pressure on Killian in 1972 -- the year he retired.

"If my father was going to type a CYA memo, which he didn't," Gary Killian responded. "He would have typed it himself because he wouldn't have wanted anyone to see it. But it's academic because Colonel Staudt had been out of the unit for 18 months -- as is well documented."

Contacted at his office in Bartlett, Texas, former Major Dean Roome, who served with Lt. Bush, responded to the latest information.

"If the memos are fraudulent, then why were they generated? Roome asked.

"Marion Carr Knox is validating what the rest of us are saying. She says once in a while a pilot would miss a physical because some of them were commercial pilots. I was also a commercial pilot with Continental Airlines. The clinic did not just open up for us to take a personal physical. The Flight Surgeons had to be there along with a full complement of medical personnel. We took our physical during the Uniformed Training Assembly (UTA) just like everyone else."

"The 'former Army person' she references is the person we believe may have created the fraudulent documents in an effort to injure President Bush. He has his own agenda and I doubt that he has any 'real ones' [documents].

Ms. Knox states emphatically that she is not acting for political motives, and has no formal relationship with any political party. She says she just wants to set the record straight.

Developing...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: killian; mariancarrknox; rathergate; tang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last

1 posted on 09/14/2004 3:50:58 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
"It was General Staudt, not then Lt. Colonel Hodges [who succeeded Staudt], that was putting on the pressure to whitewash Bush. For instance he didnt take his flight examination or his physical. And the pilots had to take them by their birthdays.

Exactly. Bush's birthday is July 6th. The phony memos re the physical pre-dated this by a period of months.

2 posted on 09/14/2004 3:52:39 PM PDT by ambrose (http://www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Texas Guard Secretary surfaces: says CBS docs 'forgeries', but stands by accusations against Bush.

Okay, two things:

  1. It's refreshing that someone admits the docs in question are forgeries
  2. I find it incredibly doubtful that a secretary would have direct access to Bush's records and remember them in any reliable capacity after 35 years.

Sounds to me like Ms. Knox was paid off...but not at a high enough sum.

"I did not type these particular memos. I typed memos like these," Knox told the DRUDGE REPORT from her home in Houston.

Thank you for that admission, Ms. Knox. Now please refrain from acting like you even know what the hell Bush did or didn't do in his ANG service. Thank you.

3 posted on 09/14/2004 3:56:03 PM PDT by Prime Choice (The Religion of Peace ISN'T.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

I just heard it Brit mention the sec. to Killian! She said the docs are forgeries, BUT that it was known around there that W was not very well liked or something like that and what was on the memos were the feelings of some of them there ...HERE WE GO FOLKS, FUEL FOR THE RATS! :(


4 posted on 09/14/2004 3:56:07 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Related thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1216011/posts


5 posted on 09/14/2004 3:57:05 PM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Killian on Lt. George W. Bush
6 posted on 09/14/2004 3:58:13 PM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan (BURN IN HELL, MICHAEL MOORE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

PING


7 posted on 09/14/2004 3:58:36 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
"What really hecked me off was when it was somebody on TV, associated with the White House, who said that all of this information was lies. And I got excited at the time because I knew that I had typed documents with this information because a person like Bush stood out from the others -- because of his association with his father."

If CBS had contacted her before it ran the story, and shown her the memos, she could have saved them a lot of embarrassment. They could have deep-sixed the memos and just gone on her word that Bush had missed a physical and that Killian thought Staudt was pressuring him. Dan Rather would have his hit piece on Bush and there would be no "forgery" fol-der-al to distract from the issue and destroy Rather's credibility.

8 posted on 09/14/2004 3:59:55 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

The more I think about this, the more it has to be Bill Burkett guy behind this.

Burkett was a member of the Texas Army National Guard and Knox claims that the memos used "army lingo."

We know Burkett hates Bush and has an axe to grind.


9 posted on 09/14/2004 3:59:56 PM PDT by GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

This has the makings of a carefully concocted set up.

They made these documents so that their veracity would be challenged and now they can trot out their real source... Mrs. Knox.


10 posted on 09/14/2004 4:00:21 PM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Ms. Knox states emphatically that she is not acting for political motives, and has no formal relationship with any political party.

Huh? I thought she said that Bush wasn't qualified to be President and that she didn't vote for him in 2000 and wasn't planning on voting for him in 2004. So ... yes, she DOES have a political motive for saying that the content of the letters is valid but the letters themselves are not. She's trying to do what Dan Rather and CBS News wants ... ignore the problem of the letters authenticity, while addressing their content. I'm sorry, that's just nonsense.
11 posted on 09/14/2004 4:00:54 PM PDT by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2

It is interesting to see how CBS/Dems will try to spin her story. I know there is some confusion at the DU. Some are saying she really did type them, but forgot due to old age.

On the other hand, some are trying to spin this as being abour what Killian really thought...

but what we're left with is hearsay about what Killian really thought from a Bush-hating secretary, which is refuted by Killian's own family.


12 posted on 09/14/2004 4:03:20 PM PDT by ambrose (http://www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
"Knox told the DRUDGE REPORT that she did not vote for Bush in 2000 because he is 'unqualified' for the job, and does not intend to vote for him in 2004, either."

...motive and lack of credibility regardless of disclaimer.
13 posted on 09/14/2004 4:03:30 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: ambrose

Yeah, and she's been silent all this time about Bush - even waited five days before coming forward with the information that, while the memos cBS has were forgeries, she typed "memos similar" -- really? Then they must exist somewhere, dont they? Why aren't THOSE originals being produced, then, instead of hacked up computer frauds?

I'm also amazed that she can remember a memo's contents with such clarity after having typed it some 30 years ago. I type some pretty nasty stuff, working for lawyers, and I couldn't remember the "general gist" of something I typed 10 years ago. But that's just me -- your mileage may vary...


15 posted on 09/14/2004 4:04:19 PM PDT by Right Cal Gal (Armed, Female and Southern!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
It is totally irresponsible for Knox to inject herself in this way. She has already had the benefit of reading the forgeries, so of course it's a piece of cake for her to claim she heard similar stuff from Killian, even though it was thirty years ago. What a shame she can't PROVE he told her any of this stuff by providing DOCUMENTATION.

Her word is garbage and should be totally discounted.

16 posted on 09/14/2004 4:04:21 PM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

She is contradicting herself the more she speaks when she states G.W. treated her well but then states he wasn't liked, she validates there was forgery committed, and she is leveling charges without evidence.

As I said before, let the Dems use her as a star witness. I'm not particularly afraid of them.


17 posted on 09/14/2004 4:05:03 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
The dems are trying real hard now to deflect the forgery issue and keep a bead on the fraudulaent info in the forgeries. Right along Dan Rather's talking points. But, why not state the obvious...if the info was real and true, there would be no need to make forgeries.

They have simply found a doofas way of saying they forged the memoes, but the information is real...which is another lie piled on top of all the others.

The Colonel would not have had his secretary type such a CYA memo...just like the son says. But beyond that, the Colonel did not have a need to type such a memo, and never did.

It is pathetic to watch these liars weave their web of lies and get entangled in them.

18 posted on 09/14/2004 4:05:10 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

I can't remember one darned thing that I typed 32 years ago.


19 posted on 09/14/2004 4:05:26 PM PDT by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

It just shows that Democrats will lie through their teeth to defeat Bush. She admits their forgeries, but says they are accurate. No proof. No evidence. Just more lies.


20 posted on 09/14/2004 4:05:42 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson