Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REPORT: Swifties Have Previously Unseen Naval Records Supporting Their Charges Against Kerry
www.crushkerry.com ^ | 9/14/04 | www.crushkerry.com

Posted on 09/14/2004 7:04:35 AM PDT by crushkerry

From crushkerry.com

BREAKING NEWS - CRUSHKERRRY.COM HAS A SCOOP ON PREVIOUSLY UNSEEN KERRY NAVY DOCUMENTS. ACCORDING TO AN INSIDE SOURCE, THE SWIFT BOAT VETERANS FOR TRUTH OBTAINED A NUMBER OF PREVIOUSLY UNSEEN NAVAL RECORDS YESTERDAY. THESE NEW DOCUMENTS VALIDATE A NUMBER OF THEIR CLAIMS AGAINST JOHN KERRY. NOTE THAT THESE NEW RECORDS ARE DIFFERENT FROM THE AFTER ACTION REPORTS RELEASED YESTERDAY AND POSTED BY DRUDGE. THESE BLOCKBUSTER DOCUMENTS ALL BUT ENSURE A CONTINUED ONSLAUGHT FROM THE SWIFTEES FOR THE DURATION OF THE CAMPAIGN. LOOK FOR THE NEW INFORMATION TO BE DISCLOSED IN UPCOMING SWIFT BOAT ADS

Understandably, there may be doubts about whether crushkerry's sources are credible. To allay those doubts please Click Here


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boat94ran; kerry; napalminthemorning; swiftboatveterans; swiftvets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-369 next last

1 posted on 09/14/2004 7:04:35 AM PDT by crushkerry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: biblewonk; Grampa Dave; JPJones; LincolnLover; jmstein7; backinthefold; .cnI redruM; Lazamataz; ...

crushkerry.com Scoop ping.


2 posted on 09/14/2004 7:05:17 AM PDT by crushkerry (Visit www.crushkerry.com to see John Kerry's positions filleted - and to see our lovely spokesmodel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

I'm in the middle of Unfit for Command right now.

The evidence that John Kerry alone admits to is more than enough to disqualify this creep for even being elected dog catcher.


3 posted on 09/14/2004 7:05:55 AM PDT by Guillermo (It's the 99% of Mohammedans that make the other 1% look bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

These are the kinds of things I'd rather have stay a secret.

Being first with the news isn't always good for the overall strategy.


4 posted on 09/14/2004 7:06:09 AM PDT by coconutt2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

Exxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxcellent.


5 posted on 09/14/2004 7:06:38 AM PDT by CaptRon (Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry; SittinYonder

Ain't done spanking Kerry yet ping


6 posted on 09/14/2004 7:06:51 AM PDT by eyespysomething ("...you're not fit to be a prison guard at Abu Ghraib, much less commander in chief.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...

PING...............


7 posted on 09/14/2004 7:06:58 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

Rush has said that they have an October surprise for Sen. Ketchup that will be devastating.


8 posted on 09/14/2004 7:07:10 AM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

They better triple check them to make sure there is nothing forged about them...


9 posted on 09/14/2004 7:07:11 AM PDT by 2banana (They want to die for Islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

I would Rather this hits out of the blue. Why are folks telegraphing the next move to the Kerry campaign?


10 posted on 09/14/2004 7:07:11 AM PDT by drc43 (How dare John Kerry, who never served a day as President, question the actions of President Bush?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

October Surprise?

Goodie, goodie!


11 posted on 09/14/2004 7:07:45 AM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (Which part of "Don't Mess With Texas" didn't you get?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

KERRY IS CRUSHED!


12 posted on 09/14/2004 7:07:53 AM PDT by ServesURight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

ping


13 posted on 09/14/2004 7:08:14 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: drc43
Why are folks telegraphing the next move to the Kerry campaign? I would say because Kerry does not act well under pressure. I think that if Kerry knew what is hidden in his record, and word gets out that it will be revealed, he will have a breakdown before it is released. Then, the MSM cannot blame the release of docs on Kerry loosing his mind..
14 posted on 09/14/2004 7:09:19 AM PDT by mnehring (YP4W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

Methinks that's the whole point of what Rather is doing. He knows the TANG documents are fake, but they are willing to go that route if it also casts doubts on the Swifties memos as well. It's their only hope to diffuse this bombshell. They hope that people will just say, "everybody does it, move on."


15 posted on 09/14/2004 7:09:19 AM PDT by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

So the contrived & trivial National Guard B.S. is all to pre-empt this. Now they will call these documents forgeries and will say it's payback for the Guard story. We will not get out of 1968-1973 in this campaign, apparently. But this is important info to share with voters. It certainly says more about character than missing a physical!


16 posted on 09/14/2004 7:10:11 AM PDT by BonnieJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry
< DU SARCASM ON >

Well hopefully whoever typed these up used an IBM Selectric Typewriter and not MS Word - ROFL

< /DU SARCASM OFF>

Sorry, I couldn't resist ROFL

Seriously, one has to wonder if this was not the purpose of the FORGED Bush docs --- an attempt to throw doubt on any "Document" that now surfaces.

17 posted on 09/14/2004 7:11:05 AM PDT by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry

The other night I posted this on another thread:

This may be tin-foil territory, but it has been bothering me...it is obvious to me that CBS was duped, and, being so blinded by hatred of the president, didn't do their homework. But is the source who gave them these memos covering two bases here?

Whoever sent these to CBS had to know they would be headline news, and they get to pummel Bush with fraudulent information that becomes part of the national dialog...Dems benefit. But, they are so amateurish that it leads me to believe the memo's forger also wanted to cause a stir about fraud.

The thing that bothers me is that it has been hinted around FR that the Swift Vets might actually have Kerry's records...that he might have already signed his 180 for his biographer. That has NOT been confirmed, just speculated.

There has even been speculation that the title of the book Unfit for Command might reference something written on his records.

With that in mind, is it even possible that the dustup over forged docs serves to neutralize Kerry's records before they are released? Since the Bush documents are forgeries, will their argument be that we can't trust anything that might be released about Kerry's?

Whether this is intentional or not, I'm betting that will be the left's argument if Kerry's records leak. Just a thought.

What are your thoughts on how to counter the cries of "fraud" the left will raise now?


18 posted on 09/14/2004 7:11:59 AM PDT by cj2a (When you're pathetic, but you don't know you're pathetic, that's really pathetic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: crushkerry; Ernest_at_the_Beach; MeekOneGOP; JohnHuang2; nutmeg; mhking; backhoe; Peach; ...

Good!

Will we get to see more creative forgery by John Forges Kerry!?


19 posted on 09/14/2004 7:12:29 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (When will the ABCNNBC BS lunatic libs stop lying to Americans? Answer: NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
One word about SBV's docs: Provenance

Big key to avoiding question of forgery.

20 posted on 09/14/2004 7:13:57 AM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-369 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson