Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/14/2004 6:16:19 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: kattracks

Dan's attempt to smear the President with forged documents backfired big-time, that's why the big liberals down at CBS are so "distressed."


97 posted on 09/14/2004 6:38:59 AM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Dan Rather has damaged his beloved Democrats beyond repair, another nail in the liberal coffin. He was a buffoon in Vietnam and Afghanistan and he is a buffoon today. Park it Dan, just go home.


106 posted on 09/14/2004 6:41:09 AM PDT by Eighth Square (We've met the enemy - no doubt about that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"I'm confused by some of what I've heard today," he offered, before insisting that if Rather's documents were indeed forged, it was an innocent mistake. "You're dealing with genuine professionals. The last thing in the world that any of these people would want is to phony something," he told the Times.

If they think that I think they're the paragons of pristine honesty and integrity, then they are ignorant. O'Reilly gave that same crapola last night.

If he "was looking out for us" then why don't I call him daddy? We don't need Papa Doc, we got us Papa Bill.

There are others who do their job and do it far better. They are MAKING THEMSELVES obsolete.

107 posted on 09/14/2004 6:41:18 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army and Proudly Supporting BUSH/CHENEY 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"I'm confused by some of what I've heard today," he offered, before insisting that if Rather's documents were indeed forged, it was an innocent mistake.

If it was an "innocent mistake" .. one would think a Journalist would want to correct the record

108 posted on 09/14/2004 6:41:21 AM PDT by Mo1 (Why is the MSM calling the Vietnam Vets and POW's a suspected group??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
You're dealing with genuine professionals.

In a manner like unto 'ladies of the evening'.

109 posted on 09/14/2004 6:41:38 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Hey Dano-saur, What did you know and when did you know it??

Pray for W and Our Troops

116 posted on 09/14/2004 6:44:01 AM PDT by bray (Some men have skeletons in their closets, some have killing fields!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Dan really put himself on the line and I can't imagine him knowingly defending something he knew not to be the case."

I can!

117 posted on 09/14/2004 6:44:14 AM PDT by thingumbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
These idiots thought that because they were able to fool one handwriting expert with questionable credentials that they could fool the world.

I'm beginning to think that someone at CBS created the forged documents to support the story they've been working on for the last two years. If the docs had come from an "unimpeachable source" as CBS contends, then why the need to hire a document expert before they released them? My suspicion is that they hired a document expert to see if they could fool him. After they got assurances that they had fooled their "expert" they ran with the story thinking they could fool everyone.

Hey CBS, prove me wrong!

118 posted on 09/14/2004 6:44:21 AM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Sort of reminds me of the movie, "Guide for the Married Man" when Robert Morse is teaching the virtuous Walter Matthau the art of the adulterous husband. "Even when caught red handed, Deny, Deny, Deny.


119 posted on 09/14/2004 6:44:21 AM PDT by The Last Front
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

IF Captain Dan was not in on the manufacturing of the documents, he should be feverishly ferreting out who it is that has destroyed his career instead of pretending the emperor is still sporting a designer wardrobe.


120 posted on 09/14/2004 6:44:32 AM PDT by Let's Roll (For a guy who shirks his own job, Kerry sure is eager to tell others what they should do ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

I think this story was part of a much larger attempt to discredit Bush. The sugar coating memo was a feint. The real purpose was to raise questions about why he missed the physical. Kitty's book coming out, immediately following that story, was meant to plant a seed that Bush missed the physical because of drug use. The rest of the campaign would be spent answering questions about drug use while in the guard. Talk about smear tactics and dirty tricks; if you connect the dots this was an organized attempt to smear Bush in the worst way. Kudos to the bloggers who blew it apart before they could take it to the next level.


124 posted on 09/14/2004 6:45:11 AM PDT by Algae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

==="You're dealing with genuine professionals.===

Professional Political whores.


126 posted on 09/14/2004 6:46:50 AM PDT by JesseJane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

There is no shortage of tall buildings in NY (hint, hint).


130 posted on 09/14/2004 6:49:03 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Ah the richness the irony. Perhaps someone should tell Dan that "there is a cancer on CBS news" ...
133 posted on 09/14/2004 6:51:16 AM PDT by PMCarey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

134 posted on 09/14/2004 6:52:52 AM PDT by handy (Forgive me this day, my daily typos...The Truth is not a Smear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"You're dealing with genuine professionals. The last thing in the world that any of these people would want is to phony something," he told the Times.

No, we're dealing with genuine liberals and the last thing in the world these genuine liberals want in Bush re-elected. They have their priorities, you know.

Bush will be re-elected in Nove and shortly after that, I believe, is when we'll see Rather scoot on out.
135 posted on 09/14/2004 6:53:01 AM PDT by petconservative (Kerry, um you said 'bring it on' so we brought it on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
-"Another CBS source said there was increasing nervousness over the star anchorman's decision to stonewall on an independent investigation into his dubious Guard report."

Sounds like there might be some people at CBS that may not want to 'go down with the ship'!

136 posted on 09/14/2004 6:53:19 AM PDT by LibFreeUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Dan's hatred of Bush drove him to the edge of the cliff.


139 posted on 09/14/2004 6:55:04 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Has "America's Most Trusted Journalist", Walter Cronkite issued a statement about this? It would seem a natural to hear him defend his boy, Dan...
142 posted on 09/14/2004 6:57:30 AM PDT by Guna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I can't imagine him knowingly defending something he knew not to be the case."

Why not? Rather himself said that he believes that a person can be a liar and still be an honest person.

143 posted on 09/14/2004 7:01:29 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson