Put some ice on that, dan.
Running on page 8 of tomorrow's comPost.
RUTROH, Shaggy, we're in deep sh!t now.
Sorry, auto exerpt didn't work.
Here's a teaser...
The lead expert retained by CBS News to examine disputed memos from President Bush's former squadron commander in the National Guard said yesterday that he examined only the late officer's signature and made no attempt to authenticate the documents themselves.
"There's no way that I, as a document expert, can authenticate them," Marcel Matley said in a telephone interview from San Francisco. The main reason, he said, is that they are "copies" that are "far removed" from the originals.
? aren't you gonna post anything?
52 pick-up.
Love the headline. THIS IS MAJOR!!!!!!
The rats are abandoning ship! Every man for himself!
I am glad CBS is sticking to their guns. This story would be dead otherwise.
Swift Pajamaed Freepers for Truth!
Page 08.
Figures.
Wow. This is THE definitive MSM article so far. They've taken the docs apart and found lots of the inconsistencies that Freepers found!
And Laura Bush is now commenting!!
"Meanwhile, Laura Bush became the first person from the White House to say the documents are likely forgeries. "You know they are probably altered," she told Radio Iowa in Des Moines yesterday. "And they probably are forgeries, and I think that's terrible, really." "
The Fat Lady isn't singing yet,
but the snowballs are getting soft.
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"I am personally 100 percent sure that they are fake," said Joseph M. Newcomer, author of several books on Windows programming.
This is in the frigging WASHINGTON POST.
Rather is finished.
Wow! Matley does have integrity! Dan Rather, who has no integrity in his own right, will have to a much better job of screening his 'experts' in future hit pieces on the President.
It is interesting that he and WP are just hitting the highlights of material presented at FR for some time now. But, the important point is that they are hitting those points strongly now.
I don't see how CBS will be able to continue with the Stonewall when the rest of MSM is turning against them on this report.
In the interview on Friday .. didn't he say something about putting his reputation on the line??