Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Expert Cited by CBS Says He Didn't Authenticate Papers (On DRUDGE)
Washington Post ^ | 9/14/2004 | Michael Dobbs and Howard Kurtz

Posted on 09/13/2004 7:39:52 PM PDT by jhouston

Edited on 09/13/2004 8:04:19 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-270 next last
To: ambrose

If I recall correctly, that Matley guy was already under investigation by some kind of specialist agency.


121 posted on 09/13/2004 8:27:06 PM PDT by My back yard (Vast Right Wing Pajama Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: kabar

PING


122 posted on 09/13/2004 8:27:31 PM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
He thought it was easy money-- tell See BS what they wanted to hear (they're real), get paid and go home. Since he was anonymous when the report first aired, he didn't think it would ever come back to bite his ass.

Yup. It's a new world the MSM is gonna have to learn to live in. This fraudulent story would have never been exposed just a few years ago.

123 posted on 09/13/2004 8:27:35 PM PDT by Wissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: jhouston
"But the memo is dated Aug. 18, 1973, nearly a year and a half after Staudt retired from the Guard. Questioned about the discrepancy over the weekend, CBS officials said that Staudt was a "mythic figure" in the Guard who exercised influence from behind the scenes even after his retirement. "

And they expect to get away with such inane explanations...because they always have.

124 posted on 09/13/2004 8:27:39 PM PDT by intolerancewillNOTbetolerated (Throw The Obstructionists Out Of Congress Bush/Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhouston
Wolf Blitzer's live interview w/ Michael Dobbs last week:




"If you compare the documents that CBS produced with the documents that we know to be authentic, that did come from Bush's National Guard unit, none of those documents use proportionate spacing. And that's only one of the anomalies," says the Post's Michael Dobbs.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/09/10/rather/index.html


- Wolf send another blow to CyaBS!
125 posted on 09/13/2004 8:27:50 PM PDT by califamily4W (to all FR Vietnam Vets...thank you then, thank you again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
Anyone have CBS policy memos on vetting articles?

It's a smell test.

Problem with it is that they can't smell their own bad breath.
126 posted on 09/13/2004 8:27:57 PM PDT by Mike Fieschko (Did IQs just drop sharply while I was away?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Thanks Dan for not backing down.

You kept the story alive.

Now for the cover up phase.

Since the WP has pretty much reported that they are fakes, the story now becomes: Who forged the docs? Did CBS and the DNC conspire to manipulate the news to change the outcome of a federal election?

127 posted on 09/13/2004 8:28:25 PM PDT by handy (Forgive me this day, my daily typos...The Truth is not a Smear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: omstrat

Welcome aboard! It gets better the longer you're here...FR is very addicting! You'll learn how do do some work (part time) while you're Freeping full time...LOL


128 posted on 09/13/2004 8:28:43 PM PDT by 2nd amendment mama (Can The Ban - let the AWB sunset • www.2asisters.org • www.cantheban.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: hawkaw
Gee when I reading the Wash. post article, I thought, for just a second, I was reading a Freeper thread from last Thursday morning.

I too am in a little shock...Is there any expert, ANY, that would put their reputation on line, and authenticate without waffle words, the documents? Any?

129 posted on 09/13/2004 8:28:48 PM PDT by Drango (What's the Font, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Very nice post!


130 posted on 09/13/2004 8:29:30 PM PDT by Tom_Busch (Vote Bush/Cheney in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Love that!!


131 posted on 09/13/2004 8:30:17 PM PDT by AB AB AB (Dan Rather: "I think you can be an honest person and lie about any number of things.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Rocko; Darkwolf377; JPJones; Alouette

I have to give credit where credit is due. The original idea came from Darkwolf377... the Photoshop work to bring his concept to FreeRepublic is mine.

Swordmaker


132 posted on 09/13/2004 8:30:42 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tagline shut down for renovations and repairs. Re-open June of 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: jhouston

That's funny, the same CBS expert in an ABA article said he cannot aunthenticate a signature unless it's an original document:

http://d2d.ali-aba.org/_files/thumbs/components/PLIT0209-MATLEY_thumb.pdf

Marcel Matley authenticated the photocopied memos for CBS. Per Matley himself two years ago, it is physically impossible to authenticate a document from a photocopy. From the American Law Institute - American Bar Association.


Using and Cross-Examining Handwriting Experts
September 2002

Marcel B. Matley

"In fact, modern copiers and computer printers are so good that they permit easy fabrication of quality forgeries. From a copy, the document examiner cannot authenticate the unseen original but may well be able to determine that the unseen original is false. Further, a definite finding of authenticity for a signature is not possible from a photocopy, while a definite finding of falsity is possible."


133 posted on 09/13/2004 8:30:43 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My back yard

Hehehehe....if I weren't so dedicated to the 2nd Amendment I might consider "Pajama Mama"....Heck, I spend hours sittin' here in my PJ's freepin! Sometimes however, work gets in my way.....LOL


134 posted on 09/13/2004 8:32:44 PM PDT by 2nd amendment mama (Can The Ban - let the AWB sunset • www.2asisters.org • www.cantheban.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
He's an "expert". A discredited expert is useless. Either he comes clean or he throws his career down the toilet.

Bingo, Marcel Matley knows he needs to come clean or never work again.

135 posted on 09/13/2004 8:33:13 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: TeleStraightShooter

LOL, Hey CBS, got any 'experts' left who will support the story or is Dan Rather just going to hide under the covers with the blanket over his head?


136 posted on 09/13/2004 8:34:33 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jhouston

For crying out loud. Forged documents, non-expert experts, misquoted witnesses, and a Kerry fundraiser who's a certified liar as their main "evidence." Dan is obviously a dunce or a dirtbag. But what explains the inaction of his boss? Is SeeBS News run by a dead man, or what?


137 posted on 09/13/2004 8:34:43 PM PDT by cookcounty (Kerry trashed OUR service, now he demands reverence for HIS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Experts must rely on the quality of their work...word of mouth in a story like this will sink a reputation faster than we can blink. Old Marcel must have thought more about protecting his reputation..i.e. his wallet than getting hanoi john flip flop kerry elected.


138 posted on 09/13/2004 8:34:52 PM PDT by GailA ( hanoi john, I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, before I impose a moratorium on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jhouston

Dems EXCEL at half-truths and propaganda and know that it works. They figure all they need to do is come up with talking points for dem talking heads so they can say something, anything to exhaust this story and wait it out. This is the early days of the Clinton impeachment strategy all over again. They think some new story will come out to eclipse this and it will be get buried like Gary Condit who got away with murder.


139 posted on 09/13/2004 8:34:54 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jhouston
I watched Dan Rather this evening on CBS ... his arrogance and defiance in denying this obviously bogus story (prove I'm wrong)is astounding ... apparently his counterparts in the MSM feel much the same way ... Rather, in order to retain a modicum of self respect for the media in general, needs to be brought down ... the process has begun.
140 posted on 09/13/2004 8:36:24 PM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-270 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson