Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Help! Did anybody just see Keith Olbermann talking about Buckhead??
http://www.msnbc.com ^ | September 13, 2004

Posted on 09/13/2004 5:10:52 PM PDT by Howlin

Did anybody just hear Keith Olberman talking about Buckhead???

I wasn't paying that much attention, but I could have sworn I heard him say that "Buckhead" was an attorney who had just been to a meeting with the Bush-Cheney group before the memos were shown on CBS!


TOPICS: Free Republic
KEYWORDS: buckhead; cbs; fr; keitholbermann; memos; odormann; sitzpinklerolbermann
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 601-620 next last
To: Mo1
I didn't see that .. but I just got done watching O'Rielly pretty much insult us on the internet

I can't help but think that someone has got O'Reilly in their little hand and when they squeeze, he squeals. That, or his journalistic goal is to become as nuanced as is John Kerry. Either possibility is the picture of a worthless talking head batting his gums.

It is tempting to send O'Reilly a pithy email to point out that he has become a journalistic pith ant.

181 posted on 09/13/2004 5:52:38 PM PDT by Ghengis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud
Well, if he's talking about his freeper profile page, there isn't anything on it now.
182 posted on 09/13/2004 5:52:41 PM PDT by 2Jedismom (I'm part of a free-floating cadre of rightist warriors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Do a Google on "Howlin".


183 posted on 09/13/2004 5:53:19 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud
I was the one who said "homepage".

Olbermann said something to the effect that a look at the posting history of Buckhead reveals........

I assumed that he gleaned the lawyer info from BH's homepage.

Disregard the "homepage" aspect of Olbermann's comment.

184 posted on 09/13/2004 5:53:39 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: bigjoesaddle
I didn't see it that way at all. This bastard is PUSHING this hard, he was preforming intense, intimate foreplay on this story, hoping something explodes!

Foreplay isn't PUSHING - it's teasing.

185 posted on 09/13/2004 5:53:45 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness; Howlin

Let me get this straight..turns out the one who caught a flaw in a forged government document that was put up by CBS as a real document -- one that could tarnish a sitting president just weeks before he is seeking re-election -- is an active Republican, and that somehow legitimizes the forgery and makes CBS and Dan Rather less liable??? IOW, we have a blatant democrat lie, exposed by a Republican telling truth, and these should be treated with equal invalidation?

You know what I mean?? Somewhere there actually are Democrats that will disregard this evidence, this fact about the memos, because it was exposed by Republicans!

This is the essence of the corruption of the liberal left, and what is such a win/win for the democrats even when they get caught cheat/lying. ...that folks can't see truth when it is dusted off and set in front of them.


186 posted on 09/13/2004 5:54:03 PM PDT by My back yard (Deep Font detector in use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
The conspiracy theory went like this:

Hence, Tin Foil Olberman smells more rats than a fill in any silly Dan Rather quote here, and this must have been a setup by Karl Rove and the vast rightwing conspiracy.

His guest, Craig Crawford (or something like that) from Congressional Quarterly, was not willing to go along with Olberman's delusions. That's about all I remember.

187 posted on 09/13/2004 5:54:11 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MistyCA

I understand, I have no problem with it, anonimity is actually one of the essential elements of a forum like this.


188 posted on 09/13/2004 5:54:25 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago

Brock also monitors Rush every day.


189 posted on 09/13/2004 5:54:39 PM PDT by NavySEAL F-16 (Proud to be a Reagan Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
Yehawwwwwwwww...better dusty off those nice silky pj's I've been saving for a special occasion! ;)

Speaking of pjs ...

With Apologies to Randy Newman

Pajama People

Pajama People got no reason
Pajama People got no reason
Pajama People got no reason
To live

They got little stubby fingers - little blurry eyes
They protest all day - postin' great big lies

They got snotty noses and coffee-stained teeth
They wear week-old underwear on their nasty little seat.

Well, I don't want no Pajama People
Don't want no Pajama People
Don't want no Pajama People `Round here

Pajama People are not the same as you and I (A Fool Such As I)
Good folk are liberals 'til the day they die (It's A Wonderful World)

Pajama People got nobody
Pajama People got nobody
Pajama People got nobody
To love

They got little beady eyes - and a furrowed brow
You gotta cuff their ears - just to say hello

They got little protest horns
That go beep, beep, beep

They're always saying
"Cheney's our veep, veep, veep!"

They got nasty little toes
hangin' from jammys below
We gotta make sure - it's their time to go.

Well, I don't want no Pajama People
Don't want no Pajama People
Don't want no Pajama People
'Round here
190 posted on 09/13/2004 5:54:47 PM PDT by tang-soo (Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC

Hey TankerKC,

Just like Thanksgiving in Iraq, right? BTW, GREAT job. The hat that matches my jammies is off to you.

(No, *I'M* Spartacus.)


191 posted on 09/13/2004 5:55:02 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

Hmmmm...Mrs. Saddle will get a suprise tonight!


192 posted on 09/13/2004 5:55:20 PM PDT by bigjoesaddle (Shrug)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
I heard it. If Oberman spent half as much time researching the forged docs as reading Buckheads profile and previous posts he would be calling for Dan's head on a stick.

That would take too much common sense

HEY MEDIA ... INSTEAD OF TRYING TO TRASH US .. HOW ABOUT YOU PROVE US WRONG???

WHERE IS KERRY'S 180 FORM???

HUH???

193 posted on 09/13/2004 5:55:42 PM PDT by Mo1 (Why is the MSM calling the Vietnam Vets and POW's a suspected group??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I don't like the sounds of this.

They are insinuating this was a planted document started HERE?



194 posted on 09/13/2004 5:56:27 PM PDT by Limbaudda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; All
Not planning on pulling off anything brilliant, ever. Just want to let David Brock and all the other weasels furiously reading here that I volunteer for the Republican Party in my spare time.

Cheapskates don't pay, either.

Captain Renault : I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!
[a croupier hands Renault a pile of money]
Croupier : Your winnings, sir.
Captain Renault : [sotto voce] Oh, thank you very much.

Here's looking at you, David!

195 posted on 09/13/2004 5:56:34 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Are you now, have you ever been, a "Buckbeak?" Wearing BLACK Pajamas, in honor of Hanoi John)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
In the near future, they'll be saying, "The Wall Street Journal, LA Times, New York Times, The Weekly Standard, The National Review, and ABC's 'The Note' were mentioned on Free Republic."

And then you'll hear somebody say, "LA Times, New York Times... What are they?"

196 posted on 09/13/2004 5:56:49 PM PDT by Savage Beast (The internet is the newspaper of record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
Yup. And since he's here, I'd like to tell Olberman to get a better hairpiece. His current one scares my cat.

His current one IS a cat.

197 posted on 09/13/2004 5:57:09 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11

Olberman gonna be beggin Bristol (ESPN) for his job back. If he hasn't already. ;)


198 posted on 09/13/2004 5:58:01 PM PDT by 80skid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: chiller
The best, the brightest, and the fastest are here on FR.

FR= ForgeriesRevealed.com

199 posted on 09/13/2004 5:58:21 PM PDT by tophat9000 ("Blackrock Bob" (aka DAN RATHER)....is in full denial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I sent O'Reilly an email lambasting him for saying that there is "rampant fraud among the Bush-haters AND the Kerry-haters." I asked him for evidence and told him he has none. I also mentioned that I was watching only to see if his head had grown any larger because I wanted to make sure I was viewing his program when it finally exploded. Then I made sure to let him know I had the sound muted for good measure. What a pompous jerk he is!


200 posted on 09/13/2004 5:58:24 PM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 601-620 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson