Posted on 09/13/2004 3:31:43 PM PDT by GRRRRR
Brit interview with Sandra Ramsey Lines, Document Expert
Showed signatures from the docs
What can you tell us? These two sigs were compared to known docs from Jerry Killian, from WH docs.
She intercompared the WH docs and all four of those appear to be consistent.
Then, she looked at the CBS docs, intercompared, the partial and full sigs, both of them are Partial sigs ending stroke of J always finished his FULL name J E R R Y but in the forged docs, NO E R R Y numerous differences. The J is not the same K is not the same very , very different. These two sigs from the CBS docs were NOT from his hand.
BRIT asks her about the rest of the docs, the text of the docs ?
Working off copies, possibility of authenticating using COPIES word processing system came to her mind.
A REAL forensic expert looks at the ENTIRE DOC, she was struck that they were computer generating, used WORD and the default wrap around etc. matches. Plus the superscript, proportional spacing etc also draws her to conclude that they are very probably not produced by Typewriter
END _30_
Sorry for bad sentence structure, but was typing and listening at the same time...
MORE GRIST!!
G
I believed that by the weekend the MSM would have buried this story so deep it wouldn't even be found among the blogs. But I was wrong, Rathergate's got legs and will run!
You go GRRRR!
And I just heard on the Grapevine that one soldier who testified in the "Winter Soldier" hearings says now that he was pressured by anti-war leaders, including Kerry, to make up stories. Did I hear that right?
More GRRRRRist! Good! Thank you, Brit Hume!
the signature
http://www.aboutpolitics.net/images/killian.jpg
This woman was the most clear and concise guest I have heard re the fake docs.
I wonder who Rather is protecting. The identity of his source could be one of the biggest stories of the year. I wonder if other media, out of competitive rivalry with CBS, will go after this.
You heard it right. I don't know if it's the same guy who was at the rally in WDC this weekend, Steve Pitkin, but it may be.
Funny tagline, BigB!
I think Rather is protecting himself.
Great tagline...ROFLMAO!!!!!!
Great show. Any fair-minded viewer would have to conclude that the documents are forgeries.
Yes it was Steve Pitkin. He was at the Vets rally yesterday & asked for forgivness.
Now lets see what Rather says.......
Amen to "less Greta." Hannity would be ok IF he would shut up and let his guests make their point without interruption. But it'll never happen.
Must be talking about Steven Pitkin:
I can only come up with the NewsMax version to link:
http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/9/9/102940.shtml
See:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1214438/posts
The name is Steve Pitkin.
"I wonder who Rather is protecting. The identity of his source could be one of the biggest stories of the year. I wonder if other media, out of competitive rivalry with CBS, will go after this."
***
He may be protecting someone but I think it has at least as much to do with hubris as that.
I would have thought ABC/NBC/CNN would have buried this out of professional courtesy but the fact that they have reported on it so extensively means all bets are off. They may very well go after this source.
Congressman Billybob
Latest column, "Time to Talk about the 2008 Election"
If you haven't already joined the anti-CFR effort, please click here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.