Posted on 09/13/2004 7:57:35 AM PDT by MegaSilver
The media in the United States have been oddly fastidious in failing to report one aspect of last week’s horror in Beslan: that several Russian girls were raped by Muslim terrorists in front of their parents and classmates. The failure to report rapes in the Russian school was at odds with the eagerness of American journalists, a decade ago, to report ad nauseam on the entirely fictitious "rape camps" supposedly run by Bosnian Serbs in which Muslim women were allegedly subjected to similar degradation.
That Muslim propagandists and their Western abettors should have resorted to this particular whopper is especially galling in view of Islam’s encouragement of violence against women in general, and its explicit blessing of rape of captive non-Muslim women by Muslims in particular. The behavior of Chechen terrorists in Beslan, disgusting in every gory detail by the standards of civilized humanity, was justified by the tenets of Islam and by the personal example of the cult’s inventor, Muhammad.
Having established himself as the ruler of Medina, Muhammad attacked the Jewish tribe of Banu-‘l-Mustaliq in December of A.D. 626. His followers slaughtered many Jewish tribesmen and looted thousands of their camels and sheep. They also kidnapped 500 of their women. The night after the battle Muhammad and his brigands staged an orgy of rape. As one of the brigands, Abu Sa’id Khudri, later remembered, a legal problem needed to be resolved first: In order to obtain ransom from the surviving Jews for the captive women, Muslims had pledged not to violate them:
We were lusting after women and chastity had become too hard for us, but we wanted to get the ransom money for our prisoners. So we wanted to use the Azl [coitus interruptus]. We asked the Prophet about it and he said: "You are not under any obligation not to do it like that."
Having ethnically cleansed and robbed of property all but one of three Jewish clans in Medina, in A.D. 627 Muhammad decided to deal with the last, Banu Qurayzah. He offered the men conversion as an alternative to death. Upon their unsurprising refusal, some 900—exact numbers are unknown—were decapitated, one by one, in a ditch surrounding their encampment, in front of their women and children. Muhammad’s Einsatzgruppen worked hard: Torches had to be lit so that the slaughter could be accomplished in one day. The women, thus widowed or orphaned, were raped that same night. Muhammad chose as his concubine one Raihana bint Amr, whose father and husband were both slaughtered before her eyes only hours earlier. (Such treatment of the victims had been duly sanctioned by a prophetic revelation in the Kuran.)
In his early years, as a powerless and often ridiculed outsider in Mecca, Muhammad had enumerated the series of temptations which could enslave human beings: The passion for women, the desire for male children, the thirst for gold and silver, spirited horses, and the possession of cattle and land (Kuran, 3:12). Once enthroned in Medina as the head of a theocratic statelet, he wanted to possess them all. Muhammad freely admitted that two things in the world, women and perfume, attracted him—so much so that he departed from his own laws in pursuit of both. Contrary to his own regulations he had at least 15 wives (some sources claim up to 25). The youngest was Aisha, who was seven years old when Muhammad—44 years her senior—"married" her. Two years later, 53-year-old Muhammad consummated this liaison and raped the girl of nine left under his control.
The sordid story of Muhammad’s "marriage" to Aisha reflected a mind-set and a lifestyle. Rape of enslaved women came naturally to Muhammad. A Christian slave woman by the name of Maryah aroused his passion for nights on end, which provoked a rebellion in his harem. Divine assistance was, in the end, needed to restore order in the household, with the Kuranic verse duly advising Muhammad not to restrain himself from "that which Allah has made lawful" (66:1–3).
Even more scandalous was the case of Zeinab, the wife of Zayd, Muhammad’s adopted son. Lusting after her, Muhammad ordered Zayd to divorce her and took Zeinab as yet another wife. The deal was soon sanctioned by another revelation from Allah: "there should not be any fault in the believers, touching the wives of their adopted sons, when they have accomplished what they would of them" (36:37).
These examples indicate that the status of women in Islam is comparable to that of the human rights in Cuba: theoretically exalted, deplorable in practice. The sources of true Islam—the Kuran and Hadith—provide the basis for theory and subsequent Shari’a practice regarding the role of women. When a judge in Pakistan recently sentenced a young woman to death for "adultery" by stoning after she had been raped by her husband’s brother, he had merely followed the Kuranic law. The fact the woman, Zafran Bibi, was raped was of no consequence: She was still guilty of "having intercourse outside of marriage."
Violence against women is also condoned, even mandated, in Islam. Allah mandates that the disobedient wives are to be beaten (4:34). As the authoritative Azhar University scholars in Cairo explain, "the Qur’an bestows on man the right to straighten her out by way of punishment and beating, provided he does not break her bones nor shed blood." Physical violence against one’s wife is divinely ordained and practically advised in Islam. In Muhammad’s rendering of the story of the righteous Job, Allah ordered him to beat his wife: "Take in thine hand a branch and smite therewith and break not thine oath" (38:44).
Some Muslim apologists claim that the Islamic teaching and practice is in line with the findings of clinical psychology. Beating is beneficial to them, we are told, because "women’s rebelliousness (nushuz) is a medical condition" based either on her masochistic delight in being beaten and tortured or sadistic desire to hurt and dominate her husband. Either way,
beating is her remedy. So the Qur’anic command: ‘banish them to their couches, and beat them’ agrees with the latest psychological findings in understanding the rebellious woman. This is one of the scientific miracles of the Qur’an, because it sums up volumes of the science of psychology about rebellious women (The Australian Minaret, Australian Federation of the Islamic Councils, November 1980, p.10).
Islam stands or falls with the person of Muhammad, a flawed man by the standards of his own society, as well as those of the Old and New Testaments (both of which he acknowledged as divine revelation). He was flawed even by his new law, of which he claimed to be the divinely appointed medium and custodian. The horror unleashed by Chechen terrorists on Russian children in Beslan, and the rape of adolescent girls in particular, is the fruit of Muhammad’s example.
The problem of Islam, and the problem of the rest of the world with Islam, is in its claim that the words and acts of Muhammad provide the universally valid standard of morality and behavior for all time. Islam, in Muhammad’s texts and its codification, discriminates against women. It is extremely offensive. Those who submit to that faith must solve the problem they set themselves. Islam further discriminates against all "unbelievers." Until the petrodollars support a Kuranic revisionism that does not, we must go for it with whips and scorpions, hammer and tongs.
Having ethnically cleansed and robbed of property all but one of three Jewish clans in Medina, in A.D. 627 Muhammad decided to deal with the last, Banu Qurayzah. He offered the men conversion as an alternative to death. Upon their unsurprising refusal, some 900—exact numbers are unknown—were decapitated, one by one, in a ditch surrounding their encampment, in front of their women and children. Muhammad’s Einsatzgruppen worked hard: Torches had to be lit so that the slaughter could be accomplished in one day. The women, thus widowed or orphaned, were raped that same night. Muhammad chose as his concubine one Raihana bint Amr, whose father and husband were both slaughtered before her eyes only hours earlier. (Such treatment of the victims had been duly sanctioned by a prophetic revelation in the Kuran.)
....Of course, there is an alternative path that the peaceful muslims could turn to and still worship the same God:.....
I don't think their god is the same as the God we worship.
The God we worship would not tolerate these actions in His name.
....Of course, there is an alternative path that the peaceful muslims could turn to and still worship the same God:.....
I don't think their god is the same as the God we worship.
The God we worship would not tolerate these actions in His name.
Not only that, but they "report" unbelievable statements that it's only a bunch of radicals. I find it interesting that a "religion that is so full of hate, that targets Everyone that doesn't believe like them, is not labeled a vicious criminal entity. I will give Satan this, he sure knew how to protect his evil minions. "Call it a religion." that'll stop em in their tracks.
Ah but the AntiChrist will deceive followers into believing that they are following the true God. Muslims even claim that it is the "same" God (with elements stolen from the JudeoChristian Bible which has proven its historical accuracy in duplication).
If they want to abandon the rantings of the Mohammedist cult, they could look to Christianity.
bttt
Islamofascists erased from its surface and its history!!
----Yes, that is what it is going to take, and the sooner we realize that, the better. They are more than meeting us halfway and virtually BEGGING for martyrdom, so why do we continue to approach them as if some of them will eventually join us?
The war on terror has got to be waged FOR REAL, FULL-SCALE, wherever they exist, by whatever governments they are terrorizing. Russia will have to do something soon, and it will. Spain may be a lost cause unless the terrorists who forced the issue onto their election after blowing up their railroads have deemed that Spain has not done ENOUGH
to accommodate them, and starts initiating around round of terror. If we even unilaterally decided to wage a full-tilt war on terror, that by itself would impress the undecideds that we are in a WAR. The way its being fought now allows for both too much indecision and , and too much opportunity for the Dem opportunists to throw all kinds of aspersions on HOW and WHY the war in Iraq is being waged. That should NEVER have been allowed to happen in the first place. Certain kinds of death-penalty cases should not be allowed to languish on death-row for 15 years, through appeals and the constant "agonizing re-appraisals" we put our natural human sympathies through. There are individuals who are irreedemable, as much for their conduct as because the way they see the world simply does not allow them to live among the civilized. Justice should be swift for people like Richard Allen Davis, who kidnapped and murdered Polly Klass,O. J. Simpson, who cut the throats of two people (an Islamofascist among us!) one of whom was his wife, and just as swift for any Islamofascist who gleefully watched Americans jumping to their deaths from the Twin Towers. We should let them all martyr themselves as surely as the 19 who hijacked the planes and flew them into buildings full of people. We have just got to get it right: we've got to drop the bombs on THEM.
They sure could if they want to spend eternity with the Lord. Or, they can continue murdering, beheading, raping, terrorizing and go live with their god - Satan.
What still concerns me is , that in X42's haste to bring Muslims over here during that war, what kind of records were kept??? How many AQ were brought over and lost due to INS red tape??
Islamanazis must die!
Oops an error has occurred. This blog does not exist. Thank you return to blog-city.com : ) <<< me
bookmarked for further infuriated re-reading
Well said.
LOSERS.
read later
Hmm... gotta remove that link.
Charles Manson had nothing on him!
Manson =failed cult of murder
Mo = one billion strong and growing
Take the worst traits of Charles Manson and Adolf Hitler, and who do you get?
Add pedophilia and BO and you got Mo'
think I will be waiting a long, long time...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.