Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here We Go Some More
The American Spectator ^ | 09-13-2004 | Washington Prowler

Posted on 09/12/2004 9:28:38 PM PDT by nyconse

While CBS news anchor Dan Rather can say there is no internal investigation under way over the alleged forged documents used as the foundation for an investigation into President George W. Bush's National Guard service, you wouldn't have been able to tell from the 15 or so 60 Minutes and CBS News" staffers working away feverishly on Friday and Saturday to try to nail down their story.

On Friday, according to CBS News sources, Rather spent the day on the phone and dealing with CBS suits who were nervous about the fall out from the story. "All Dan could say was that this was an attack from the right-wing nuts, and that we should have expected this, given the stakes," says a CBS News producer. "He was terribly defensive and nervous. You could tell."

All day Friday, Rather, his producer on the story, Mary Mapes, and other 60 Minutes staffers were scrambling to shore up support from their sources on the story. That effort didn't go so well. By Saturday, one of their key sources, retired Maj. Gen. Bobby Hodges, had said that CBS misled him, and that he had never been shown the memos in question.

"We pulled the trick of only calling some sources at the last minute to reconfirm," says the CBS producer. "Someone called Hodges, I think, on Monday night and read him parts of the document. The late contacts are a standard practice so we don't tip off the competition or our sources."

Hodges is a critical loss for CBS News' credibility. He was the superior officer of the man CBS claims wrote the memo, Lt. Col. Jerry Killian, who died in 1984.

MEANWHILE, OVER THE WEEKEND journalists from around the country were attempting to track down the original source of the documents. "We're having a hard time tracking how we got the documents," says the CBS News producer. "There are at least two people in this building who have insisted we got copies of these memos from the Kerry campaign by way of an additional source. We do not have the originals, and our sources have indicated to us that we will not be getting the originals. How that is possible I don't know."

One individual several news outlets were looking at was Bill Burkett, a former Texas National Guard officer. Burkett in the past has cooperated with both press and Democratic Party opposition researchers in slinging mud at President Bush. Burkett gained some national attention earlier in the campaign when he claimed he was at National Guard headquarters in Austin 1997, when he overheard Guard officials and a representative of then Governor Bush discuss how to sanitize Bush's files. That story was fully discredited. Nonetheless, Burkett sat down for at least three different interviews with CBS News for the story now at the center of the controversy. One of those interviews was with Rather's producer, Ms. Mapes.

"There are rumors here that if there are any real documents, they are hand-written notes from Killian that someone like Burkett was holding, and that instead of using the hand-written notes, someone typed them up to look more official," says the CBS News producer. "They would look better on TV and posted on line if they were typed, but on a number of levels, that story just doesn't hold up. There are too many inconsistencies factually with what is in the memos."

THE MOST GLARING ISSUES now are the seemingly phony P.O. Box addresses used in the headers of at least one of the memorandums. Such post office box addresses were not used by the National Guard at that time, let alone a box with a number "34567," as in the memo.

Yet another issue: the 18-month gap between the retirement of Col. Walter "Buck" Staudt on March 1, 1972, and August 18, 1973, when the Killian of the disputed memos claimed that Staudt was putting pressure on him to sugarcoat an evaluation of Bush. Almost everyone involved in the National Guard in Texas says Staudt would have had virtually no influence in the active units nearly a year and a half after leaving the service.

PERHAPS MOST TROUBLING to the CBS News staff looking into how its story went off the rails is the timing of the memos' appearance. "Some 60 Minutes staffers have been working on this story for more than three years off and on," says the CBS News producer. "There have been rumors about these memos and what was in them for at least that long. No one had been able to find anything. Not a single piece of paper. But we know that a lot of people here interviewed a lot of people in Texas and elsewhere and asked very explicit questions about the existence of these memos. Then all of a sudden they show up? In one nice, neat package?"

This CBS New producer went on to explain that the questions 60 Minutes folk were asking were specific enough that people would have been able to fabricate the memorandums to meet the exact specifications the investigative journalists were looking for. "People were asking questions of sources like, 'Have you ever seen or heard of a memo that suspended Bush for failing to appear for a physical?' and 'Have you heard about or know of someone who has any documentation from back in the 1970s that shows there was pressure to get Bush into the National Guard?' It was like they were placing an order for a ready-made product. That is the biggest problem I have with this. It's all too neat and perfect for what we needed. Without these exact pieces of paper, we don't have a story. Dan has as much as admitted that. Everyone knows it. We were at a standstill on this story until these memos showed up."

REPORTERS ARE ALSO LOOKING at staff and associates of Sen. Tom Harkin, who enthusiastically held a press conference on Thursday morning using the forged documents as the tent pole for attacks against President Bush. Harkin called Bush a "liar."

"Harkin has been pushing this story for a while," says the CBS producer. "Not this specific story, but the 'Bush is a liar about his record' story. His people seemed particularly interested in making sure they could keep their boss up to date on what was going on."

That Harkin was the individual selected to be the attack dog on this particular issue was an interesting one, give that Harkin himself has a checkered history about telling the truth about his involvement in the Vietnam War.

WITH MORALE AT WHAT some Kerry campaign insiders consider an all-time low, Sen. John Kerry, who unlike Tom Harkin did serve in Vietnam, did what any true leader does. He sets up a conference call. During the Labor Day weekend, during meetings with senior staff, campaign director Mary Beth Cahill suggested to the candidate that he try to buck up the troops, since the media onslaught against him, as well as the dipping poll numbers, were affecting staff in Washington and in satellite offices around the country. Kerry acknowledged their concerns by gathering the Washington staff into the central office space in their McPherson Square suites and speaking to them via speaker phone. Kerry told them that things were going well on the road. The crowds were enthusiastic, and he could feel the campaign was moving in the right direction with the new senior staff additions.

"He actually said that he felt the campaign had turned the corner," says a Washington-based staffer. "Some of us couldn't help but laugh given that he's made fun of Bush for saying the same thing. You hear stuff like that and you just feel sick. You look over at people like [Joe] Lockhart and Cahill and they seem to understand it too."

Kerry further undercut his own efforts, when he hung up his side of the call before any questions could be asked by staff members.

"[Kerry] doesn't seem to want to acknowledge that he has problems," says the staffer. "I'm low level, but there are a few people here who have stopped coming in to work or to volunteer. We've got some issues, and the guy who should be trying to help fix it doesn't seem to care."

Cahill seems to understand this. On Thursday, since the candidate wouldn't face his own staff, Cahill pulled out the big guns. She invited her old boss, Sen. Ted Kennedy down to the Washington offices to further raise the morale of Kerry's staff.

Kennedy actually said little about Kerry, beyond the fact that he was a fighter who would continue fighting. After mentioning Kerry, Kennedy then went on a 10-minute diatribe about President Bush. "His face was turning red, he was really getting into it," says the Kerry staffer. "Then the next day we saw him make the same speech on the floor of the Senate. Guess we were the dress rehearsal."

THERE ARE OTHER PROBLEMS with the Kerry campaign. According to several Kerry and DNC sources, Kerry advisers have been furiously holding focus group meetings in an attempt to find some issue of national concern that might cut their way in the coming weeks. But nothing they've looked at seems to be working. Of course, even if they were to find something there is no guarantee their man would run with it.

For example, some media types thought having his old pal John Sasso along on the road would help focus Kerry a bit more on his stump speeches. Judging by Kerry's performance last Thursday in North Carolina, they're not sure anymore. While talking about the economy, health-care policy, Kerry went off speech and began stumbling immediately. Kerry said that he would always tell the public the truth, and if the audience didn't believe him, they could "[g]o to a web site. It can be johnkerry.com or go some other place. Go to truth.com, if there is one, and find out what's really happening," Kerry said.

I just know this is going to go back to the DNC or some Dem partisan like Harkins-Dem=liars. Someone knew what CBS wanted and like a good samaritan supplied...the fake memos.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cbs; cbsnews; killian; memo; napalminthemorning; nationalguard; presbush; rather
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 321-323 next last
To: nyconse

interesting stuff. Thanks for posting it.


221 posted on 09/13/2004 4:10:09 AM PDT by Iowa Granny (Proud to be associated with pajama wearing news gatherers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
"We're having a hard time tracking how we got the documents," says the CBS News producer. "There are at least two people in this building who have insisted we got copies of these memos from the Kerry campaign by way of an additional source. We do not have the originals, and our sources have indicated to us that we will not be getting the originals. How that is possible I don't know."

This statement is totally unbelievable!! The first sentence just totally shows utter incompetence if true and an egregious LIE if not...

Sounds like CBS is admitting they received the forged memo's from the KERRY campaign. OOOH, that's a surprise!!! NOT!

This whole statement is the most ludicrous thing I've ever seen!!

Are they really this stupid?

222 posted on 09/13/2004 4:13:32 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Do you just think I fell off a turnip truck?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
I called my local CBS and told them something had to be done...

Call your local CBS affiliate and ask them how one goes about filing a letter in their relicensing file. Broadcasting "Facts" from forged documents, with the objective of affecting a presidential election, is AGAINST the public interest. Get your local broadcast affiliate onboard to scream at CBS news. Your local affiliate has a broadcast license at risk, and can therefore become highly motivated.

223 posted on 09/13/2004 4:14:59 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
CBS and Kerry look ....like road kill

As long as they keep Bush's record as President and Kerry's record in the Senate out of the news cycle, they are far from road kill.

They are doing what they must do to win.

224 posted on 09/13/2004 4:15:44 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Hillary becomes the RAT candidate on October 9. You saw it here first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Boundless
"No one here at the Democratic National Committee had anything at all to do with any of those documents," McAuliffe told reporters.

I take that as a narrow disclaimer, not a broad one. He is saying "we didn't author or create those." He is not saying "we never saw them until CBS put them on the air." I would assume both the DNC and Kerry camp handled this set of documents, before CBS saw them.

225 posted on 09/13/2004 4:23:35 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Southack
CBS is totally, fully, completely hosed. They can't produce the originals. They can't verify authenticity without the originals, and now they can't even say who was their source!

Are you questioning the patriotism of Dan Rather?!?

226 posted on 09/13/2004 4:33:25 AM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Talking_Mouse

Probably so...I was struck by the lack of knowledge the forger demonstrated. For example, during the 70's almost everyone had a secretary. Now with computers, most people have to do their own typing...my husband lost his secretary at GM recently...which he hates because my husband doesn't type. I can assure you, he would never type a memo...he hand writes everything. Also, the CYA memo. I am a Navy brat...the brass asked for preferential treatment for certain people (I bet they still do), but no one in their right mind would write a memo acknowledging this...it would never be admitted. The person who did this has watched too many 'I was following orders' movies. This person believes that if a superior orderer Killian to do this ...than the CYA document provides well 'cya' if caught. It doesn't. This memo would be akin to a smoking gun.


227 posted on 09/13/2004 4:47:04 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: BJClinton

BWAHAHAHA!


228 posted on 09/13/2004 4:50:05 AM PDT by Indie (Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

I love it those scummy....(you fill in the blank) shot down by a freeper once again. The Dems might have won this election if they ran a smart campaign and stayed away from Vietnam-blinking idiots (thank God).


229 posted on 09/13/2004 4:52:38 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Nam Vet

Sorry...


230 posted on 09/13/2004 4:57:14 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

I think they are going to have to admit they are lying. we need to keep up the pressure...


231 posted on 09/13/2004 5:00:01 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

"All Dan could say was that this was an attack from the right-wing nuts..."

Hey, I resemble that remark. How does he know I am a wing nut? Because I'm in my PJs?


232 posted on 09/13/2004 5:00:14 AM PDT by astounded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

So many people know where these documents came from...it will come out.


233 posted on 09/13/2004 5:01:52 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

"Harkin has been pushing this story for a while," says the CBS producer. "Not this specific story, but the 'Bush is a liar about his record' story. His people seemed particularly interested in making sure they could keep their boss up to date on what was going on. That Harkin was the individual selected to be the attack dog on this particular issue was an interesting one, give that Harkin himself has a checkered history about telling the truth about his involvement in the Vietnam War. "

I suggest an all-out assault on Harkin via Free Republic. We need to work to get this clown out of office and disgraced. He is a despicable fraud.

Any suggestions on a plan of attack from Iowa-based Freepers?


234 posted on 09/13/2004 5:03:40 AM PDT by astounded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: astounded

The contempt Dan Rather has for the public just oozes out of his mouth...he is the great Dan Rather. We are the little people...how dare we; do we know who he is...also, he is just trying to be fair...those mean swifties attacked Kerry (doesn't matter if it is true)- by God it's payback time, CBS the new motto fair truth and balanced lies.


235 posted on 09/13/2004 5:15:25 AM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
I'd be willing to bet that it was the Clintons.

Carolyn

236 posted on 09/13/2004 5:19:15 AM PDT by CDHart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Locke
John, thank you for this info. Were can I find a cite for that, so I can cram it down some liberal throats?
237 posted on 09/13/2004 5:27:10 AM PDT by Talking_Mouse (Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just... Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

I don't believe CBS was "duped"or "hoaxed". I believe Dan Rather is in bed with kerry's campaign and working actively with them to defeat the President. Rather is not an innocent here - he is part and parcel of a criminal fraud perpetrated on behalf of kerry. This is big - way bigger than Watergate or any other campaign irregularity.

In fact, the majority of the MSM can be deemed "in bed" with the kerry campaign, and I would not be surprised to see them linked closely to the bogus docs.


238 posted on 09/13/2004 5:29:12 AM PDT by astounded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

I agree - this may lead to Harkin. We need to work to track this down. It seems Harkin was all over this before it even broke, with prepared text. Given his USAF " combat service", and his hatred of the President plus his obvious lies about his air force activities, this is a natural. He needs to be driven from office. "Senator", indeed. More like anti-American leftist.


239 posted on 09/13/2004 5:34:16 AM PDT by astounded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy

.....The first time in history that a "news" organization has blatently and brazenly attempted to assist in the ouster of an American President.......

I would argue this statement is not true because Dan Rather blatently and brazenly declared the Florida 2000 election for Algore before the polls closed in the central time zone. There are estimates of 10,000 voters not voting as a result of the blatent and brazen act by Dan Rather and CBS news.


240 posted on 09/13/2004 5:42:32 AM PDT by bert (Peace is only halftime !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 321-323 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson