Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Devastating if True (to Dan) E-mail #3 at Hugh Hewitt Site (Technology not there until 1989)
Hugh Hewitt site (scroll down to e-mail 3) ^ | Sept. 12, 2004 1:00 PM PT | Hugh Hewitt/Paul Snively

Posted on 09/12/2004 1:45:38 PM PDT by litany_of_lies

E-mail Number Three (of which I have only thetiniest bit of understanding, but which I suspect is even more bad news for Dan and the CBS crowd):

"-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1

Hi, Hugh.

My name is Paul Snively. I'm a software engineer and former Apple Computer employee. Specifically, I was employed by Apple Computer from 1989-1991, the years in which Apple invented TrueType font technology, shipped the first implementation of TrueType in Macintosh System Software 7.0, and licensed the TrueType technology to Microsoft. My personal involvement with TrueType, however, was limited to participating in a code review of the TrueType renderer for System 7.0.

Corky Cartwright, whom I've incidentally known of for a minimum of three years due to his involvement with the Scheme programming language and specifically the , is, of course, exactly correct in his observations regarding proportional font spacing and the likelihood of its applicability even via the IBM Composer circa 1973. The animated GIF of the Microsoft Word document overlaying the CBS-provided PDF is already quite convincing. However, it gets worse for CBS.

Microsoft uses TrueType font technology under license from Apple Computer. Apple Computer holds three patents related to TrueType: , , and , as described at . The salient fact is that _at least one of these patents covers technology that can affect the font's metrics_, as described at , which I quote in part here:

"Some small aspects of the TrueType specification being covered by several patents owned by Apple Computer, it is generally not possible to render TrueType glyphs exactly as they should without infringing on Apple's IP rights (without a license).

This explains that we've taken some special measures to deal with this problem:

First of all, a default build of the FreeType 2 sources will not use any of the patented techniques to render TrueType glyphs. You'll thus be safe to use it freely in all kinds of projects.

Unfortunately, this freedom comes at the price of sometimes less-than-ideal glyph quality, depending on the font design, and most surely different glyph metrics for a given font."

Thus, the Microsoft Word document/CBS PDF overlay exhibiting completely accurate character overlay strongly suggests that, at the very least,

the origin of the PDF document was a piece of word-processing software using an Apple-licensed TrueType implementation, a font technology, glyph-hinting process, patent, and license that didn't exist until 1989.

Please feel free to quote me on the air and/or on your web site. Please also note that this e-mail is digitally signed using GNU Privacy Guard, and my public key can be found on and other OpenPGP-compatible public keyservers around the Internet, with key ID 31C14015, fingerprint BD49 DB9E B110 9BA6 7B7D 6D19 6E8B 75C3 31C1 4015.

Best regards, Paul Snively


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: apple; cbs; cbsnews; fonts; glyphs; hewitt; hughhewitt; killian; rather; truetype
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Well, whadaya think? If true, it absolutely ends the argument about the docs once and for freaking all.

Hugh's other 2 e-mails are also damning to Rather and CBS.

1 posted on 09/12/2004 1:45:44 PM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
Hmm... Interesting. Very interesting.

Dan, I think it's over for you.

2 posted on 09/12/2004 1:56:14 PM PDT by mattdono (Chris Matthew is Zell Miller's b*tch! (and the MSM is FR's b*tch!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies

Deep doodoo for the Rat Rather.


3 posted on 09/12/2004 1:56:59 PM PDT by beyond the sea (Free Martha Mitchell......... and Jail Teraaaaaayza)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
Don't worry, Dan Rather, 60-Minutes, CBS News and finally the CBS Network all stand by their story because the underlying facts are supported by the preponderence of evidence.

(Loose translation----we don't care if the documents are forged, we like the story and are going to keep runing with it until we have no credibility in any forum and we have destroyed the name of our network)

4 posted on 09/12/2004 2:00:53 PM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
The DNCbs is being steamrolled by the truth.
5 posted on 09/12/2004 2:04:27 PM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (Sorry Kerry, you're 3 decimal places adrift: 3,000,000 not 3,000 "displaced"/murdered SE Asians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert357

And .... didn't Dan say that we should be looking beyond the question of validity of the documents? We should be looking at the content!! Yeesh!!!!!


6 posted on 09/12/2004 2:04:43 PM PDT by RightField (The older you get ... the older "old" is !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Robert357

Dan Rather, Americas' village idiot.


7 posted on 09/12/2004 2:07:02 PM PDT by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
If true, it absolutely ends the argument about the docs once and for freaking all.

Not with Dan. He is continuing his stonewall with very limited hangout. He probably sees it as a "nothing to lose" proposition: Admit he foisted a fraud upon the American people or deny, deny, deny on the chance, however slim, that the issue may blow over.

8 posted on 09/12/2004 2:07:55 PM PDT by luvbach1 (President Bush is conservative only when compared with the commies allied against him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert357

"...going to keep runing with it until we have no credibility in any forum and we have destroyed the name of our network..."

It's time to ask CBS this: "What is Rather holding over the heads of some higher ups that they are willing to destroy CBS rather than risking their own careers. It is obvious now that Rather is being protected to the detriment of the shareholders of CBS." There is the criminality of investor fraud now underway at the Black Eye Network.


9 posted on 09/12/2004 2:11:44 PM PDT by Socratic (Kerry/Edwards - Forging a New Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RightField

LOL! Yea, forget the problems of the authenticity of these documents, let's have him answer the IMPORTANT questions raised in them!
(is he on drugs?)


10 posted on 09/12/2004 2:12:43 PM PDT by Sarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightField
It just goes proves that in addition to inventing the internet, Al Gore (the wood) also invented a focused beam gravity wave particulate time recombiner.

So he transformed the Underwood at Killians office temporarily on 4th May 1972 into an IBM PC with laser printer output.

I bet he didn't think he would cause all these problems for the dims.

11 posted on 09/12/2004 2:13:52 PM PDT by spokeshave (Traitor Kerry did for free what the POWs received torture to make them say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightField
Yes. Rather said the 'substance' of the memos is more important. Ellen 'ranting' Ratner yesterday and Juan William today both said the content is important, even if the documents are fakes.

They expect the public to buy that. After all, 40%+ are buying Kerry and all his 'plans' and 'new directions'.

Hey, the LibMedia sold Bill Clinton and got him elected twice. Maybe they can sell the pig-in-a-poke Kerry.
12 posted on 09/12/2004 2:16:10 PM PDT by TomGuy (His VN crumbling, he says 'move on'. So now, John Kerry is running on Bob KerrEy's Senate record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bullish
Rumor has it that Hillary Clinton's new book will be It took a village to raise that idiot.
13 posted on 09/12/2004 2:17:29 PM PDT by TomGuy (His VN crumbling, he says 'move on'. So now, John Kerry is running on Bob KerrEy's Senate record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Socratic

Actually, it is a wait-and-see.

If the Rather controversy brings viewers (which CBS has been losing in droves), and that improves the Viacom bottom line, they will let Rather continue. When the Rather controversy shows signs of damaging the Viacom bottom line, Rather will be retired.

To quote Judge Judy, "Follow the money."


14 posted on 09/12/2004 2:20:15 PM PDT by TomGuy (His VN crumbling, he says 'move on'. So now, John Kerry is running on Bob KerrEy's Senate record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

Dan and CBS will stonewall, because it is their least-bad option.


15 posted on 09/12/2004 2:21:06 PM PDT by Starrgaizr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: TomGuy
"Rather said the 'substance' of the memos is more important. Ellen 'ranting' Ratner yesterday and Juan William today both said the content is important, even if the documents are fakes."

I wonder if it will finally come to this:

Judge's instructions to the jury:

"Ladies and gentlemen, please remember that even if the defendant has been proven to have been lying, it is just as important to consider the content of his lies as it is to consider the weight of the truth."

17 posted on 09/12/2004 2:33:09 PM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
It took a village to raise that idiot.

LOL

Typeface BUMPmark.

18 posted on 09/12/2004 2:37:05 PM PDT by LTCJ (CBS, all your Boyd Cycles are belong to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Quite right - thus far I see no impact on the share price, will be interesting to see what the next week produces.

Remember folks, CBS News is a business, the P&L carries the most weight.


19 posted on 09/12/2004 2:39:02 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

"Actually, it is a wait-and-see."

I don't believe in wait -and-see. I believe in forcing the issue to the front so decisions to do what is right are made.


20 posted on 09/12/2004 2:39:19 PM PDT by Socratic (Kerry/Edwards - Forging a New Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson