Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(S. Korean)Gov't Confirms 'Non-Nuclear' N. Korean Explosion(3 times bigger than Ryongchon's)
Chosun Ilbo ^ | 09/12/04 | Choi Byung-mook

Posted on 09/12/2004 7:48:16 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Gov't Confirms 'Non-Nuclear' N. Korean Explosion

It was reported that there was a massive explosion Thursday around the town of Yongjo-ri, Kim Hyong-jik County, Ryanggang Province. U.S. Department of State, sources familiar with North Korea and the Korean government all confirmed the explosion.

A high-ranking government official said Sunday, “It is true that a large mushroom cloud about 3.5 to 4 km in diameter was observed by a satellite at around 11:00 a.m. Thursday. It was not a nuclear test, but the explosion seemed to be three times bigger than the one that took place during the Ryongchon Station accident,” and added, “Both U.S. and Korean intelligence authorities are investigating what caused the explosion.”

Chong Wa Dae Spokesman Kim Jong-min said, “We noticed the explosion right after it took place and reported it to the president in writing during a National Security Council meeting. But we cannot decide the nature of the accident yet.”

The accident took place in a mountainous region 1,500 meter above sea level around Yongjo-ri, where it is known that there were many munitions factories nearby. In particular, the exact spot of explosion is only 10km away southwest from the Yongjo-ri base for Rodong 1 and 2 missiles and some 30km away from the Sino-Korean border.

There is much talk about the cause of the explosion. The government official said, “If a nuclear test causes an explosion, we can detect it by reading satellite data. Thus, the recent explosion in North Korea was not caused by a nuclear test.” The intelligence authorities assume that an ammunition depot with over 1,000 tons of dynamite or an ammunition car may have exploded, or there may have been a chain explosion of chemical material or a big fire. Some Chinese sources argue that a massive explosion took pace in a munitions factory. Hong Sun-jik, director at the Hyundai Economic Institute said, “Other than the assumption that it may be a simple accident that took place due to old facilities, we cannot exclude the possibility that the explosion may have taken place due to the lack of control of the Kim Jong-il regime, or it may have been connected to a secret feud over the successor of Kim Jong-il following the rumor of death of Kim’s wife, Koh Young-hee.”

Also, some strongly argue that it is not a simple accident because it took place on Sept.9, the North’s foundation day, which is considered a very important national holiday. Others argue that with Korea’s nuclear experiments in the past at issue in the international community, it could be a false explosion by North Korea to intensify the Korea’s nuclear issue. In other words, the North intentionally caused the explosion to deliver a message to the international community.

The government official said, “We will be able to know the exact cause only after North Korea makes an official statement or intelligence authorities announces the results of their analysis.”

(Choi Byung-mook, bmchoi@chosun.com )


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: explosion; kimhyongjik; nknukes; nkorea; northkorea; ryongchon; skorea; yanggang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster

No, this article says the cloud was 3 km, not the blast radius.


21 posted on 09/12/2004 8:21:32 AM PDT by Mike Fieschko ("Daddy, are there bad men on your planes?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Foul play

Yes, but wanted to know who, why.

As I stated on another thread, I don't believe this is an accident either. Thanks.

22 posted on 09/12/2004 8:23:16 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe (I'm a POP - Political Operative in Pajamas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Statement: "(S. Korean)Gov't Confirms 'Non-Nuclear' N. Korean Explosion(3 times bigger than Ryongchon's)"

Response: Uh Oh!

Comment: Given that the initial reaction of anyone in government is to immediately lie, this explosion report is rather disconcerting. Oh well N.K. has the bomb. Let us move on!

23 posted on 09/12/2004 8:23:44 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

John Loftus on Fox now saying it could be a fuel air gas bomb dropped from a parachute


24 posted on 09/12/2004 8:24:20 AM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

My best guess at this point is that we just dropped a MOAB on a NK missile plant.


25 posted on 09/12/2004 8:25:12 AM PDT by thoughtomator ("With 64 days left, John Kerry still has time to change his mind 4 or 5 more times" - Rudy Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tscislaw

From www.globalsecurity.org...
Interesting analysis of the problems the North face in doing ANY nuke testing....


According to an analysis by Satoshi Morimoto of Takushoku University, " ... carrying out nuclear tests inside North Korea would be an extremely sticky action. That is because this kind of nuclear testing could only be carried out underground. There is absolutely no way they could do in the air or above ground. Even with underground nuclear testing, you normally need a fifty to sixty kilometer square of desert for a nuclear test. In the U.S., this would be something like the Nevada desert. Unless you have the kind they have in India or Pakistan, you cannot do it. The reason for this is that the underground water system gets damaged. North Korea has a very abundant flow of underground water, and if you carry out an underground nuclear test in this kind of place, radioactive materials would get into the water supply for the whole of the Korean peninsula, and also flow out into the Sea of Japan. As a consequence, if there were any underground nuclear testing in the Korean peninsula, it would not be just the ecological system, but also the topography of the land that would be damaged. So, will they indeed carry out tests? I think they might somehow manage to borrow the Pakistani desert, or else carry out tests in another country. Still, this being North Korea, one can never know. If they did do that sort of nuclear test, then the U.S. would run out of patience."


26 posted on 09/12/2004 8:26:03 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
but the explosion seemed to be three times bigger than the one that took place during the Ryongchon Station accident
27 posted on 09/12/2004 8:26:17 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe (I'm a POP - Political Operative in Pajamas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
John Loftus on Fox now saying it could be a fuel air gas bomb dropped from a parachute

The PRC letting NK know how they feel about Nuke testing on their border?

28 posted on 09/12/2004 8:26:28 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Last night it was pointed out the prior to the Trinity test in New Mexico in 1945, a 100-ton TNT blast was staged.


29 posted on 09/12/2004 8:26:53 AM PDT by Starrgaizr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I have a question. Can a conventional explosive device cause a mushroom cloud of this height and width? I understand the cloud was over 2.5 miles high. Can our satellites detect radiation from an above ground test or an underground test gone horribly out of control ?

I sense a great disturbance in the Force...as if thousands of voices suddenly cried out and were suddenly silenced. ( Variation of Obie Wan's detection of the destruction of Alderian in the first Star Wars movie.)

Just curious. And why are we just hearing about this 24 hours ago ?
30 posted on 09/12/2004 8:27:02 AM PDT by JediForce (Never underestimate the power of the Dark side of the Force....keep the blasters' fully charged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
Given that the initial reaction of anyone in government is to immediately lie, this explosion report is rather disconcerting.

Good point. Should we be thinking six times bigger?

31 posted on 09/12/2004 8:28:36 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe (I'm a POP - Political Operative in Pajamas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
John Loftus on Fox now saying it could be a fuel air gas bomb dropped from a parachute

I'm wondering if NK is testing a mine-clearing bomb like a MOAB. Their intention would be to clear the mines along the DMZ at some point in the future as part of an invasion of South Korea.

32 posted on 09/12/2004 8:29:17 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo ("Armed with what? Spitballs?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
Re #21

3km radius is from another article in Chosun Ilbo, which is in Korean. It appears that the blast radius is far wider than Ryongchon's. It is true that Ryongchon's blast radius was 1km.

33 posted on 09/12/2004 8:29:27 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Umm, no. Actually three or four seismic stations setup across the US can pinpoint the location of a very large explosion or earthquake anywhere in the world.

The seismic waves travel throught the earth and are reveived at each station at different times. Since we can reasonable estimate travel times, each station can estimate a range of locations that the event occurred. The intersection of these location is the event spot.

Thus we could verify the USSR's compliance with non testing treaties from the US.


34 posted on 09/12/2004 8:30:02 AM PDT by ruiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
People forget that an explosion of large amount of conventional explosive material can cause a huge amount of destruction in very short order.

Remember the muntions ship that exploded in the harbor of Halifax, Nova Scotia during world War I? Or the Port Chicago, CA port explosion in 1944? Or the explosion of the ammonium nitrate fertilizer loaded on the cargo ship Grand Comp at Texas City, TX in 1947? Or what nearly happened at the Southern Pacific yards in Roseville, CA in 1973?

According to what I've read, the explosion in Halifax harbor had the force of a tactical nuclear warhead (about the equivalent of 2,000 tons of TNT); it came very close to wiping out the entire town.

35 posted on 09/12/2004 8:33:10 AM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Ant surprise they have missle labs and bases so close to our REAL ENEMY


CHINA


36 posted on 09/12/2004 8:34:30 AM PDT by bigj00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JediForce
Re #30

I heard that a large quantity of volatile chemical could set off such a big mushroom cloud.

37 posted on 09/12/2004 8:34:41 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Really? Do we have any equipment that can tell us if that is the case? I am leaning toward the idea that the N.Koreans tested a nuke underground but underestimated the strength of the bomb and the test went out of control.

I just have a bad feeling about this. Kim John ILL may be one of John Forger Kerredy's world leader friends. This may be an "October" surprise preview. Though I don't have how it would help Lurch figured all the way out yet.
38 posted on 09/12/2004 8:43:35 AM PDT by JediForce (Never underestimate the power of the Dark side of the Force....keep the blasters' fully charged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
A lot of military installations, according to what I heard. Underground missile bases, munition factories, military research labs, etc

Maybe it was an 'ooops' moment during a test firing from of one of our subs................

39 posted on 09/12/2004 8:47:59 AM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JediForce
Re #38

Or somebody is trying to shut down Kim Jong-il's October Surprise.

40 posted on 09/12/2004 8:48:05 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson