Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia Attacks Prompt New Policy Fears
Yahoo! News ^ | September 11, 2004 | VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV

Posted on 09/11/2004 2:58:39 PM PDT by El Conservador

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 09/11/2004 2:58:39 PM PDT by El Conservador
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: El Conservador

I strongly suspect, that when Russia DOES respond - their response will be sufficiently brutal, destructive and effective to remove all doubts of their "weakness" in this struggle...

I encourge them, and will applaude them if they reduce several Islamanazi stronghold cities to rubble and 10s of thousands of deaths...

Time for SOMEONE to deliver the APPROPRIATE level of destruction and death to our enemy....
We have held back....Russia won't...


Semper Fi


2 posted on 09/11/2004 3:05:10 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek...But I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
Most expect, however, that the Kremlin will reach for harsh, Soviet-style levers instead, refusing to negotiate its way out of the Chechen war for fear it will look weak

They were attacked by islamofascists, as were we. When a group declares war is such a manner, it is not Putin's [or ours] responsibility to negotiate. There IS no duty to retreat. Period.

3 posted on 09/11/2004 3:06:33 PM PDT by Indie (Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat

I am sure that Putin will try to wipe out the Chechens. However, he will probably do it so incompetently that Russia will end up in a worse situation than if he had done nothing.

This is how the Russians got into their present mess: a combination of brutality and stupidity.


4 posted on 09/11/2004 3:09:43 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

I sure hope W has taken the opportunity to speak privately with Putin and get their ducks in order...

I had high hopes for a firmer relationship between the 2 countries before Putin let us down over Iraq...I realize that he was looking out for the best interests of his country (oil) whilst also covering up for oil for food, but they have similar interests now, and both populations demand action.


5 posted on 09/11/2004 3:32:58 PM PDT by bitt ("I'm Mad as Zell, and I'm Not Going to Take It Anymore." (CongressmanBillybob))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador

Did Russia not say that they would have the right to attack terrorist camps/bases/organizations ANYWHERE? That's a rather large target. That target would include the U.S.,corre t?


6 posted on 09/11/2004 3:35:18 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

corre t = correct. Lost my "c."


7 posted on 09/11/2004 3:35:59 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: river rat

From your keyboard to God's eyes...


8 posted on 09/11/2004 3:37:17 PM PDT by null and void (the mockery of life in a galvanized body)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: bitt

Unfortunately, following the attack, Putin only increased his verbal attacks on the United States and increased mutual adoration with Germany and France.


11 posted on 09/11/2004 3:40:32 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: bitt
I had high hopes for a firmer relationship between the 2 countries before Putin let us down over Iraq...I realize that he was looking out for the best interests of his country (oil) whilst also covering up for oil for food, but they have similar interests now, and both populations demand action.

It's one thing for us to walk away from billions of dollars owed to us, but the Russians simply could not afford to give up the billions owed by Iraq to them. The oil for food was simply Russia's way of gaining what was legally theirs.
13 posted on 09/11/2004 3:42:34 PM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador; river rat; Indie; proxy_user; bitt; madison10; null and void; Speartip; ...
From this article: Beslan also refocused attention on the way bad news is reported — or suppressed — in Putin's Russia.

From: The Chechens' American friends

By the same token, the BBC and other media sources are putting it about that Russian TV played down the Beslan crisis, while only western channels reported live, the implication being that Putin's Russia remains a highly controlled police state. But this view of the Russian media is precisely the opposite of the impression I gained while watching both CNN and Russian TV over the past week: the Russian channels had far better information and images from Beslan than their western competitors. This harshness towards Putin is perhaps explained by the fact that, in the US, the leading group which pleads the Chechen cause is the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya (ACPC). The list of the self-styled "distinguished Americans" who are its members is a rollcall of the most prominent neoconservatives who so enthusastically support the "war on terror".

14 posted on 09/11/2004 3:47:25 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
"This is how the Russians got into their present mess: a combination of brutality and stupidity."

Bull squat..

The Russians got into this mess because they did not deal brutally enough with the Islamanazis that had hijacked a political movement for independence....

It is never stupid to destroy an enemy that is declared and focused on your destruction....

It is not a coincidence that the overwhelming majority of violence in the world today -- was initiated by Muslim radicals against non Muslims..

Time to get "brutal" and effective...Time to DEFEAT the self declared enemies of civilization...

Perhaps AFTER enough of the Islamanazis are killed - it could be productive to "negotiate" an unconditional peace.
But, NOT until after they have been truly DEFEATED..

Semper Fi

15 posted on 09/11/2004 3:52:03 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek...But I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador

If the Uniteds States does not stop its double standards, we may have another Cold War.

If so, it will be America's fault.

I side with Putin.


16 posted on 09/11/2004 3:53:15 PM PDT by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (John Kerry--three fake Purple Hearts. George Bush--one real heart of gold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Well, if you're a communist state for 70 years, and pose a major threat to world peace and the West, you might make a few enemies. These enemies aren't going to forget about everything just because a few rinky-dink terrorists come along.

In their minds, the nuclear-armed B52s are still idling on runways, fully fueled and ready to blast those treacherous commies. Who cares about foes you can't even see from the air?


17 posted on 09/11/2004 3:56:49 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: madison10
"That target would include the U.S.,corre t?"

Correct....But, do you have any doubt there are terrorists or terrorist allies in the U.S.?

I don't -- and if a few of them suddenly were found in the gutters of American streets with holes through their heads - would you object?

Do you think the Russians (or others) have NEVER assassinated anyone on an America street?

Semper Fi

18 posted on 09/11/2004 3:58:58 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek...But I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador

What is wrong with these journalists? Can't they type the words 'Muslim' or 'Islam'? How can he report on this story and avoid those words?


19 posted on 09/11/2004 4:04:59 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
Most expect, however, that the Kremlin will reach for harsh, Soviet-style levers instead

Undoubtedly. The questions are:

1. How far will Putin go?

2. How will the international community react?

3. How much of a backlash will Putin face among non-Chechen regional Muslims?

4. What will be the impact on FDI in Russia, and therefore on the Russian economy?

5. How will Russia's neighbors -- both Western and Eastern -- react to the rise of Soviet-style policies and a harsher Russian state? Could regional re-armament be in the future?

6. How much territory can Russia grab under the guise of combatting Muslim terrorists?

7. How will global oil prices, and hence the US economy, be effected?

8. How will America's War on Terror be effected?

20 posted on 09/11/2004 4:09:47 PM PDT by nsc68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson