Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This article can be found in The Washington Post archives.....April 1999
1 posted on 09/11/2004 12:32:00 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blogblogginaway

2 posted on 09/11/2004 12:35:51 PM PDT by Prime Choice (The Log Cabin Republicans AREN'T.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway
SeeBS dosenm't report, they make the news.
3 posted on 09/11/2004 12:36:23 PM PDT by GaltMeister (This is not my tagline. My family has it. The tagline belongs to my family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

This sort of arrogant sloppiness is a result of excessive drug use among the jounalists of the 'Stonedest Generation'.


4 posted on 09/11/2004 12:36:36 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Thank you Rush Limbaugh-godfather of the New Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

The "Tiffany" network is turning into a pawn shop.


5 posted on 09/11/2004 12:38:22 PM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

LOL!


6 posted on 09/11/2004 12:40:44 PM PDT by Huck (What's the typography, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

bump


8 posted on 09/11/2004 12:52:53 PM PDT by need_a_screen_name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway
But that report, which was presented by Mike Wallace, cited a memo said to be written by Rudy Camacho

I really think Chris Wallace should recuse himself from any interview and discussion of CBS and their newest fraud.

9 posted on 09/11/2004 12:59:25 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway
The documents used by CBS as well as their supposed vetting has been totally discredited..IMO their best bet is to retract and apologize to mitigate any possible damages...

yes I know dead people can't be defamed but it looks like a fraud on the family and the public to me as well as President Bush....Possibly the RNC could sue for loss of contributions...

Another possibility would be Unfair Business Practices, California has a liberal law against deceptive practices, Business & Profession Code Unfair Practices... anyone in the state has standing only need prove deception not fraud......probably easiest prove...

I would imagine Marcel Martel stating one thing in his "book" and then another on TV is deceptive...


interesting article on defaming the dead:
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20040312.html
10 posted on 09/11/2004 1:05:58 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Good catch. Welcome to FR.


12 posted on 09/11/2004 1:30:32 PM PDT by John Jorsett (Kerry-Edwards: FORGING AHEAD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

FReepers,

Please keep up the posts. Also please support the websites that do the research to prove that these documents are frauds. We will win this. The MSM can't bury this. CBS will lose. Keep it up. Have faith. We will prevail!


17 posted on 09/11/2004 1:50:26 PM PDT by '61 Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Does it mention Mary Mapes? Was she possibly the producer of that story?


18 posted on 09/11/2004 1:55:11 PM PDT by EllaMinnow (John Kerry won't be happy until he's made us all as miserable as he is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple; Howlin; PhiKapMom

archive nugget ping


20 posted on 09/11/2004 2:59:07 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat ( "History? I love history! So sequential...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

bump


25 posted on 09/11/2004 3:48:07 PM PDT by RippleFire ("It was just a scratch")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Bump

28 posted on 09/11/2004 8:42:00 PM PDT by Rise of South Park Republicans (The Founding Fathers wanted disagreements as long as we all agree America kicks as* - Eric Cartman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway; EllaMinnow

I have Lexis-Nexis. I'm only posting about the first-quarter of the article, but this is the important part about the false memo. Mapes wasn't mentioned.


The Washington Post - April 13, 1999, Tuesday, Final Edition

HEADLINE: Another '60 Minutes' Apology on a Drug Smuggling Story

BYLINE: Lisa de Moraes

BODY: For the second time in four months, CBS's "60 Minutes" has made an on-air apology regarding a report about drug smuggling. This time it's over a memo that turned out to be bogus.

Correspondent Lesley Stahl delivered the apology on Sunday's broadcast, as part of a settlement with a customs official who had sued the newsmagazine.

In December, "60 Minutes" founder Don Hewitt apologized on-air for a June 1, 1997, story based on a British documentary about smugglers who swallowed heroin in latex gloves to get past authorities. An investigative panel later determined that the documentary producers had faked locations and paid actors to portray drug couriers.

In Sunday's apology, Stahl emphasized that the April 20, 1997, segment accurately reported on the flow of illegal drugs across the U.S.-Mexico border at San Diego.

But that report, which was presented by Mike Wallace, cited a memo said to be written by Rudy Camacho, the San Diego district director of the Customs Service, calling for customs agents to quickly process trucks owned by a company linked to Mexican drug cartels.

The Customs Service in Washington investigated and found the memo to be fake, and that no preferential treatment was offered, Stahl said. "60 Minutes" had already reported in February 1998 that the memo was declared bogus. But Camacho sued; the on-air apology was part of an "amicable settlement" between him and CBS News, a "60 Minutes" spokesman said.

"We have concluded that we were deceived, and ultimately so were you, our viewers," Stahl said. "Under the circumstances, we regret that any reference to that memo or to Mr. Camacho's connection with it was included in our original report and apologize for any harm to Mr. Camacho's professional reputation and any distress caused to him and his family."

(snipped)


29 posted on 09/11/2004 10:41:45 PM PDT by Tamzee (Free Republic .... Partisan Pajama People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Was it not 60 min. That had the rigged the exploding P/U Truck gas tanks footage some time back ( 10 -15 years ) ?


31 posted on 09/11/2004 10:47:24 PM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Welcome to FR


32 posted on 09/11/2004 10:50:04 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway
I think it's also newsworthy that 60 minutes is still on the air. Better shows than it get canceled all of the time.
33 posted on 09/11/2004 10:50:07 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult ("I hate going to places like Austin and Dubuque to raise large sums of money. But I have to," Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson